Terry Garth E, Liow Jeih-San, Zoghbi Sami S, Hirvonen Jussi, Farris Amanda G, Lerner Alicja, Tauscher Johannes T, Schaus John M, Phebus Lee, Felder Christian C, Morse Cheryl L, Hong Jinsoo S, Pike Victor W, Halldin Christer, Innis Robert B
Molecular Imaging Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Neuroimage. 2009 Nov 1;48(2):362-70. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.06.059. Epub 2009 Jun 30.
[11C]MePPEP is a high affinity, CB1 receptor-selective, inverse agonist that has been studied in rodents and monkeys. We examined the ability of [11C]MePPEP to quantify CB1 receptors in human brain as distribution volume calculated with the "gold standard" method of compartmental modeling and compared results with the simple measure of brain uptake. A total of 17 healthy subjects participated in 26 positron emission tomography (PET) scans, with 8 having two PET scans to assess retest variability. After injection of [11C]MePPEP, brain uptake of radioactivity was high (e.g., 3.6 SUV in putamen at approximately 60 min) and washed out very slowly. A two-tissue compartment model yielded values of distribution volume (which is proportional to receptor density) that were both well identified (SE 5%) and stable between 60 and 210 min. The simple measure of brain uptake (average concentration of radioactivity between 40 and 80 min) had good retest variability ( approximately 8%) and moderate intersubject variability (16%, coefficient of variation). In contrast, distribution volume had two-fold greater retest variability ( approximately 15%) and, thus, less precision. In addition, distribution volume had three-fold greater intersubject variability ( approximately 52%). The decreased precision of distribution volume compared to brain uptake was likely due to the slow washout of radioactivity from brain and to noise in measurements of the low concentrations of [11C]MePPEP in plasma. These results suggest that brain uptake can be used for within subject studies (e.g., to measure receptor occupancy by medications) but that distribution volume remains the gold standard for accurate measurements between groups.
[11C]MePPEP是一种高亲和力、CB1受体选择性反向激动剂,已在啮齿动物和猴子身上进行了研究。我们研究了[11C]MePPEP通过房室模型的“金标准”方法计算分布体积来定量人脑CB1受体的能力,并将结果与脑摄取的简单测量值进行了比较。共有17名健康受试者参与了26次正电子发射断层扫描(PET),其中8人进行了两次PET扫描以评估重测变异性。注射[11C]MePPEP后,脑放射性摄取很高(例如,在大约60分钟时壳核的标准化摄取值为3.6),且清除非常缓慢。双组织房室模型得出的分布体积值(与受体密度成正比)在60至210分钟之间识别良好(标准误差5%)且稳定。脑摄取的简单测量值(40至80分钟之间的放射性平均浓度)具有良好的重测变异性(约8%)和中等的受试者间变异性(16%,变异系数)。相比之下,分布体积的重测变异性大两倍(约15%),因此精度较低。此外,分布体积的受试者间变异性大三倍(约52%)。与脑摄取相比,分布体积精度降低可能是由于脑放射性清除缓慢以及血浆中低浓度[11C]MePPEP测量中的噪声所致。这些结果表明,脑摄取可用于受试者内研究(例如,测量药物对受体的占有率),但分布体积仍然是组间准确测量的金标准。