Larciprete Giovanni, Valli Edoardo, Meloni Paolo, Malandrenis Ioannis, Romanini Maria Elisabetta, Jarvis Sheba, Rossi Federica, Barbati Giulia, Cirese Elio
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fatebenefratelli Isola Tiberina Hospital, Rome, Italy.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009 Jul-Aug;16(4):445-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2009.03.023.
To estimate the feasibility of preoperative ultrasound evaluation of the umbilical region in patients undergoing laparoscopy with a previous history of abdominal surgery.
Prospective study (Canadian Task Force Classification II-1).
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Fatebenefratelli Isola Tiberina Hospital.
Twenty-five women with a previous history of open abdominal surgery (group A) and a group of 22 women with no previous history of surgery (group B) underwent dynamic ultrasound evaluation of the umbilical field.
Ultrasound Slide-By test.
Patients were asked to take a deep inspiratory breath, which accentuated respiratory excursion. The movement of the intraabdominal contents in a vertical fashion in relation to the abdominal wall, referred to as the "viscera slide," between the bowel and peritoneum was evaluated. Abdominal wall tissue thickness, Uracus to peritoneum thickness (UTP, mm) were also evaluated. Non parametric Mann-Whitney testing was used. No major demographic differences between the 2 study groups was noted. The abdominal wall tissue thickness was not significantly different between the 2 groups. The UTP was shorter in A group than in B group (1.5 +/- 0.3 mm vs 3.5 +/- 0.9 mm, p = .002). Absence of the "sliding viscera" sign was observed in 16 patients in group A and in 1 patient in group B. Patients with an absence of the sliding viscera sign were found to have subumbilical fibrous adhesions during laparoscopy.
Evaluation of trocar insertion sites may be difficult and remains a challenge for peritoneal endosurgical access. We have shown that absence of the "sliding viscera" sign is more likely to be linked to subumbilical adhesions and represents a quick method for preoperative assessment. The UTP may also be a useful measurement, which requires further validation.
评估既往有腹部手术史的患者在接受腹腔镜手术前对脐区进行超声评估的可行性。
前瞻性研究(加拿大工作组分类II-1)。
法特贝纳弗拉泰利台伯里纳岛医院妇产科。
25名既往有开腹手术史的女性(A组)和22名无手术史的女性(B组)接受了脐区动态超声评估。
超声滑动试验。
要求患者深吸气,以增强呼吸运动。评估腹腔内容物相对于腹壁垂直方向的移动,即肠管与腹膜之间的“脏器滑动”。还评估了腹壁组织厚度、脐尿管至腹膜厚度(UTP,毫米)。采用非参数曼-惠特尼检验。两个研究组之间未发现主要人口统计学差异。两组腹壁组织厚度无显著差异。A组的UTP比B组短(1.5±0.3毫米对3.5±0.9毫米,p = 0.002)。A组16例患者和B组1例患者未观察到“滑动脏器”征。在腹腔镜检查中发现无滑动脏器征的患者有脐下纤维粘连。
评估套管针插入部位可能困难,仍然是腹膜内手术入路的一个挑战。我们已经表明,无“滑动脏器”征更可能与脐下粘连有关,是术前评估的一种快速方法。UTP也可能是一种有用的测量方法,需要进一步验证。