• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹壁粘连的超声定位

The ultrasonic localization of abdominal wall adhesions.

作者信息

Caprini J A, Arcelus J A, Swanson J, Coats R, Hoffman K, Brosnan J J, Blattner S

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Glenbrook Hospital, Glenview, IL 60025, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 1995 Mar;9(3):283-5. doi: 10.1007/BF00187769.

DOI:10.1007/BF00187769
PMID:7597599
Abstract

Laparoscopic candidates with abdominal scars may have adhesions that result in visceral injury during trocar insertion. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of preoperative ultrasound mapping of abdominal wall adhesions, to provide safe initial laparoscopic access, and to guide the placement of subsequent trocars, facilitating adhesolysis when necessary. Thirty consecutive patients with previous abdominal surgery who were scheduled for laparoscopy underwent a preoperative ultrasonic examination of the abdominal wall using a 7-MHz linear ultrasound probe. Spontaneous viscera slide was measured during longitudinal scanning (normal = 2-5 cm) and induced viscera slide was evaluated during longitudinal and transverse scanning (normal = 1 cm or more) over the existing abdominal scar, the peri-umbilical region, and the remaining abdominal quadrants. Sixteen (53%) of 30 patients had adhesions under their scar and only four patients (25%) had umbilical adhesions. The 12 patients without umbilical adhesions all had successful closed cannulation while open cannulation at alternate sites was successful in the four individuals with umbilical adhesions. Blind umbilical needle cannulation was successfully done in all of the remaining 14 patients (47%) without visceral injury, including three patients (21%) with upper abdominal scars who were adhesion-free elsewhere. No adhesions were encountered that had not been preoperatively predicted by ultrasound. We conclude that examination of the abdominal wall with spontaneous and induced viscera slide, using ultrasound scanning, can reliably detect intraabdominal adhesions. The examination is best done on a highly selective basis by the operating surgeon to guide the location for initial trocar insertion and determine the type of abdominal wall cannulation in those individuals with previous abdominal scars.

摘要

有腹部瘢痕的腹腔镜手术候选患者可能存在粘连,这会在穿刺套管插入过程中导致内脏损伤。本研究的目的是评估术前腹壁粘连的超声成像,以提供安全的初始腹腔镜入路,并指导后续穿刺套管的放置,必要时便于粘连松解。连续30例计划接受腹腔镜手术的既往有腹部手术史的患者,使用7兆赫线性超声探头对腹壁进行术前超声检查。在纵向扫描时测量自发内脏滑动(正常为2 - 5厘米),并在现有腹部瘢痕、脐周区域和其余腹部象限进行纵向和横向扫描时评估诱发内脏滑动(正常为1厘米或更多)。30例患者中有16例(53%)在瘢痕下方存在粘连,只有4例患者(25%)有脐部粘连。12例无脐部粘连的患者均成功进行了闭合插管,而4例有脐部粘连的患者在其他部位进行开放插管成功。其余14例患者(47%)均成功进行了盲法脐部穿刺插管且无内脏损伤,包括3例(21%)上腹部有瘢痕但其他部位无粘连的患者。未遇到术前超声未预测到的粘连。我们得出结论,使用超声扫描检查腹壁的自发和诱发内脏滑动,可以可靠地检测腹腔内粘连。该检查最好由手术医生在高度选择性的基础上进行,以指导初始穿刺套管插入的位置,并确定有腹部手术史患者的腹壁插管类型。

相似文献

1
The ultrasonic localization of abdominal wall adhesions.腹壁粘连的超声定位
Surg Endosc. 1995 Mar;9(3):283-5. doi: 10.1007/BF00187769.
2
Accuracy of viscera slide detection of abdominal wall adhesions by ultrasound.超声检测腹壁粘连内脏滑动的准确性
Surg Endosc. 1994 Aug;8(8):871-4. doi: 10.1007/BF00843457.
3
Technique of ultrasonic detection and mapping of abdominal wall adhesions.
Surg Endosc. 1991;5(4):161-5. doi: 10.1007/BF02653253.
4
Ultrasonic detection of viscera slide as an indicator of abdominal wall adhesions.超声检测内脏滑动作为腹壁粘连的一个指标。
J Clin Ultrasound. 1992 Jul-Aug;20(6):375-80. doi: 10.1002/jcu.1870200603.
5
Reduction in visceral slide is a good sign of underlying postoperative viscero-parietal adhesions in children.内脏滑动减少是儿童术后潜在内脏与腹壁粘连的一个良好迹象。
J Pediatr Surg. 2003 May;38(5):714-6. doi: 10.1016/jpsu.2003.50190.
6
Can general surgeons evaluate visceral slide with transabdominal ultrasound to predict safe sites for primary laparoscopic port placement? A prospective study of sonographically naïve operators at a tertiary center.普通外科医生能否通过经腹超声评估内脏滑动情况以预测初次腹腔镜手术穿刺孔的安全放置位置?一项针对三级医疗中心中未曾进行过超声检查的操作人员的前瞻性研究。
Am J Surg. 2015 May;209(5):804-8; discusion 808-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.12.020. Epub 2015 Feb 12.
7
Detection of abdominal adhesions in laparoscopic surgery. A controlled study of 130 cases.腹腔镜手术中腹部粘连的检测。130例对照研究。
Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1998 Aug;8(4):273-6.
8
Role of microlaparoscopy in the diagnosis of peritoneal and visceral adhesions and in the prevention of bowel injury associated with blind trocar insertion.微型腹腔镜检查在腹膜和内脏粘连诊断以及预防与盲目套管针插入相关的肠损伤中的作用。
Fertil Steril. 2000 Mar;73(3):631-5. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00555-5.
9
Ultrasound detection of the "sliding viscera" sign promotes safer laparoscopy.超声检测“滑动脏器”征可提高腹腔镜手术的安全性。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009 Jul-Aug;16(4):445-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2009.03.023.
10
Ultrasound Visceral Slide Assessment to Evaluate for Intra-abdominal Adhesions in Patients Undergoing Abdominal Surgery - A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.超声内脏滑动评估用于评估腹部手术后患者的腹腔内粘连:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 Dec;28(12):1993-2003.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2021.07.002. Epub 2021 Jul 10.

引用本文的文献

1
MR imaging for preoperative characterization of pelvic adhesions: role in diagnosis and surgical planning.磁共振成像用于盆腔粘连的术前特征描述:在诊断和手术规划中的作用。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025 Feb;50(2):966-978. doi: 10.1007/s00261-024-04527-x. Epub 2024 Aug 23.
2
Ultrasound assessment of abdominal adhesions in neonates: data over dogma for re-operative timing.新生儿腹部粘连的超声评估:再手术时机的反教条数据。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2023 Mar 1;39(1):143. doi: 10.1007/s00383-023-05430-0.
3
The role of non-invasive imaging techniques in detecting intra-abdominal adhesions: a systematic review.

本文引用的文献

1
Previous abdominal surgery as a risk factor in interval laparoscopic sterilization.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1983 Apr 1;145(7):841-6. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(83)90689-0.
2
Open laparoscopy: a report of 150 cases.
J Reprod Med. 1974 Jun;12(6):234-8.
3
Prelaparoscopic echography used to detect abdominal adhesions.腹腔镜术前超声检查用于检测腹部粘连。
Endoscopy. 1987 Jul;19(4):147-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1018265.
4
非侵入性成像技术在检测腹内粘连中的作用:系统评价。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2019 Sep;404(6):653-661. doi: 10.1007/s00423-018-1732-8. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
4
Evaluation of the diagnostic potential of trans abdominal ultrasonography in detecting intra-abdominal adhesions: A double-blinded cohort study.经腹超声检查在检测腹腔内粘连中的诊断潜力评估:一项双盲队列研究。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2018 Oct 6;36:79-82. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2018.09.013. eCollection 2018 Dec.
5
Role of Minimally Invasive Surgery in the Reoperative Abdomen or Pelvis.微创手术在再次手术的腹部或骨盆中的作用。
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2016 Jun;29(2):168-180. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1580637.
6
A Novel Diagnostic Aid for Detection of Intra-Abdominal Adhesions to the Anterior Abdominal Wall Using Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging.一种使用动态磁共振成像检测腹前壁腹腔内粘连的新型诊断辅助工具。
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2016;2016:2523768. doi: 10.1155/2016/2523768. Epub 2016 Jan 3.
7
Intra-abdominal adhesions in ultrasound. Part II: The morphology of changes.超声检查中的腹腔内粘连。第二部分:变化的形态学
J Ultrason. 2013 Mar;13(52):93-103. doi: 10.15557/JoU.2013.0008. Epub 2013 Mar 30.
8
Role of sonography in assessing complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.超声检查在评估腹腔镜胆囊切除术后并发症中的作用。
J Ultrason. 2014 Jun;14(57):152-62. doi: 10.15557/JoU.2014.0015. Epub 2014 Jun 30.
9
Intra-abdominal adhesions in ultrasound. Part I: The visceroperitoneal bordeline, anatomy and the method of examination.超声检查中的腹腔粘连。第一部分:脏腹膜边界线、解剖结构及检查方法。
J Ultrason. 2012 Dec;12(51):472-8. doi: 10.15557/JoU.2012.0034. Epub 2012 Dec 30.
10
Comparison of peritoneal adhesion formation in bowel retraction by cotton towels versus the silicone lap pak device in a rabbit model.兔模型中棉毛巾与硅胶腹腔镜包装置在肠回缩时腹膜粘连形成的比较。
Eplasty. 2011;11:e42. Epub 2011 Nov 7.
Ultrasonic detection of viscera slide as an indicator of abdominal wall adhesions.
超声检测内脏滑动作为腹壁粘连的一个指标。
J Clin Ultrasound. 1992 Jul-Aug;20(6):375-80. doi: 10.1002/jcu.1870200603.
5
Open laparoscopy vs. closed laparoscopy: a comparison of complication rates.开放式腹腔镜检查与封闭式腹腔镜检查:并发症发生率的比较
Adv Plan Parent. 1978;13(3-4):41-50.
6
Risks and prophylaxis in laparoscopy: a survey of 100,000 cases.腹腔镜检查的风险与预防:对10万例病例的调查
J Reprod Med. 1977 May;18(5):269-72.