Abou-Zeid Alaa, Afzal Mohammad, Silverman Henry J
1Research Policy and Cooperation Unit, Eastern Mediterranean Regional Office of the World Health Organization, Cairo, Egypt.
BMC Med Ethics. 2009 Jul 4;10:8. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-10-8.
Ethics issues in the areas of science, technology and medicine have emerged during the last few decades. Many countries have responded by establishing ethics committees at the national level. Identification of National Ethics Committees (NECs) in the Eastern Mediterranean (EM) region and the extent of their functions and capacity would be helpful in developing capacity building programs that address the needs of these committees. Accordingly, we conducted a survey to determine the characteristics of existing NECs in the EM region.
We developed a questionnaire to collect information on different aspects of NECs. The questionnaire was sent to the WHO country office in each of the 22 Member States in the EM region. We used descriptive statistics to analyze the data.
We obtained responses from 77% (17/22) of the EM countries; 88% (15/17) of the countries stated they had NECs. Of these NECs, 40% (6/15) were involved in the ethics of science and technology, 73% (11/15) in medical ethics, and 93% (14/15) in medical research ethics; 10 NECs stated they reviewed research protocols. Of the respondent NECs, 25% (4/15) met at least on a monthly basis. Regarding training, 21% of the members from all of the NECs had received formal training in ethics; 53% (8/15) of the NECs had none of their members with formal training in ethics. Regarding support, 33% (5/15) received financial support and 60% (9/15) had administrative support.
While many countries in the EM region report the existence of NECs, many meet infrequently, many have members without formal training in ethics, and many lack important financial and administrative resources. Further efforts should be directed towards capacity building programs that include ethics training and provision of important infrastructure resources for these committees.
在过去几十年中,科学、技术和医学领域出现了伦理问题。许多国家通过在国家层面设立伦理委员会来做出回应。确定东地中海(EM)区域的国家伦理委员会(NEC)及其职能和能力范围,将有助于制定满足这些委员会需求的能力建设项目。因此,我们进行了一项调查,以确定EM区域现有NEC的特征。
我们设计了一份问卷,以收集有关NEC不同方面的信息。问卷被发送到EM区域22个成员国中的每个国家的世界卫生组织国家办事处。我们使用描述性统计分析数据。
我们收到了EM区域77%(17/22)国家的回复;88%(15/17)的国家表示他们有NEC。在这些NEC中,40%(6/15)参与科学和技术伦理,73%(11/15)参与医学伦理,93%(14/15)参与医学研究伦理;10个NEC表示他们审查研究方案。在回复的NEC中,25%(4/15)至少每月开会一次。关于培训,所有NEC的21%成员接受过伦理方面的正规培训;53%(8/15)的NEC没有成员接受过伦理方面的正规培训。关于支持,33%(5/15)获得财政支持,60%(9/15)获得行政支持。
虽然EM区域的许多国家报告存在NEC,但许多委员会开会不频繁,许多成员没有接受过伦理方面的正规培训,而且许多委员会缺乏重要的财政和行政资源。应进一步努力开展能力建设项目,包括为这些委员会提供伦理培训和重要的基础设施资源。