约旦两所公立大学医护人员对研究伦理委员会的认知、态度及实践
Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice Regarding Research Ethics Committees Among Health Care Faculty at Two Public Universities in Jordan.
作者信息
Ayoub Nehad M, Qandil Abeer M, McCutchan J Allen
机构信息
1 Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.
2 University of California, San Diego, USA.
出版信息
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2019 Oct;14(4):372-382. doi: 10.1177/1556264619851351. Epub 2019 Jun 6.
Abstract
Human research at Jordanian universities is increasing. This descriptive cross-sectional survey assessed knowledge, attitudes, and practices concerning the procedures and review process of research ethics committees (RECs) among faculty in health sciences in two major Jordanian universities. Most faculty reported having no training in research ethics in their current institutions. Although knowledge of RECs' roles and functions was adequate, deficiencies were found regarding the advisory and monitoring roles for RECs raised in this survey. Faculty expressed concerns about levels of ethical training for members of RECs and potential conflicts of interest and bias in review process. RECs should provide ethics training for faculty, and future research should examine the functioning of the RECs in Jordan and other Middle Eastern countries.
摘要
约旦大学的人体研究正在增加。这项描述性横断面调查评估了约旦两所主要大学健康科学领域教师对研究伦理委员会（RECs）程序和审查过程的知识、态度和实践。大多数教师报告称在其当前机构中未接受过研究伦理方面的培训。尽管对RECs的角色和职能有足够的了解，但在本次调查中提出的关于RECs的咨询和监督角色方面仍存在不足。教师们对RECs成员的伦理培训水平以及审查过程中潜在的利益冲突和偏见表示担忧。RECs应为教师提供伦理培训，未来的研究应考察约旦及其他中东国家RECs的运作情况。
相似文献
1
Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice Regarding Research Ethics Committees Among Health Care Faculty at Two Public Universities in Jordan.约旦两所公立大学医护人员对研究伦理委员会的认知、态度及实践
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2019 Oct;14(4):372-382. doi: 10.1177/1556264619851351. Epub 2019 Jun 6.
2
The understanding of research ethics at health sciences schools in Jordan: a cross-sectional study.约旦健康科学学校对研究伦理的理解：一项横断面研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Apr 21;20(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02040-5.
3
A multicenter study of the awareness and attitudes of Egyptian faculty towards research ethics: a pilot study.埃及教职员工对研究伦理的认知与态度的多中心研究：一项试点研究。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2011 Dec;6(4):99-108. doi: 10.1525/jer.2011.6.4.99.
4
Identifying structures, processes, resources and needs of research ethics committees in Egypt.识别埃及研究伦理委员会的结构、流程、资源和需求。
BMC Med Ethics. 2010 Jun 28;11:12. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-11-12.
5
Ethical challenges in global research on health system responses to violence against women: a qualitative study of policy and professional perspectives.全球卫生系统应对针对妇女暴力研究中的伦理挑战：一项针对政策和专业观点的定性研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Mar 19;25(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01034-y.
6
The readiness of the Asian research ethics committees in responding to the COVID-19 pandemic: A multi-country survey.亚洲研究伦理委员会应对 COVID-19 大流行的准备情况：一项多国家调查。
F1000Res. 2024 Jan 8;13:19. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.143138.1. eCollection 2024.
7
Knowledge, Awareness, and Attitudes about Research Ethics among Dental Faculty in the Middle East: A Pilot Study.中东地区牙科教师对研究伦理的认知、意识和态度：一项试点研究。
Int J Dent. 2011;2011:694759. doi: 10.1155/2011/694759. Epub 2011 Jul 3.
8
Evaluating research ethics committees in Vietnam and Laos: Results of a validated self-assessment tool.评估越南和老挝的研究伦理委员会：经过验证的自我评估工具的结果。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 22;19(8):e0309084. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309084. eCollection 2024.
9
Competence of ethics committees in patient protection in clinical research.伦理委员会在临床研究中保护患者方面的能力。
Indian J Med Ethics. 2011 Jul-Sep;8(3):151-4. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2011.061.
10
Knowledge and attitudes of Chinese medical postgraduates toward research ethics and research ethics committees: a cross-sectional study.中国医学研究生对研究伦理和研究伦理委员会的知识和态度：一项横断面研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Jun 28;23(1):482. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04459-y.
引用本文的文献
1
Reimagining Assent: When Things Get Lost in Translation in International Pediatric Research.重新构想同意：国际儿科研究中翻译出现问题时的情况
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2025 Feb 28;17(2):307-324. doi: 10.1007/s41649-024-00342-0. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Current status and influencing factors of nurses' knowledge and attitudes towards clinical research ethical in China: a province-wide cross-sectional survey.中国护士对临床研究伦理的知识与态度的现状及影响因素：一项全省范围的横断面调查
BMC Nurs. 2024 Sep 19;23(1):671. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02332-x.
3
Behind the scenes of research ethics committee oversight: a qualitative research study with committee chairs in the Middle East and North Africa region.研究伦理委员会监督的幕后：在中东和北非地区进行的一项委员会主席的定性研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Aug 8;25(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01083-3.
4
Knowledge and attitudes of Chinese medical postgraduates toward research ethics and research ethics committees: a cross-sectional study.中国医学研究生对研究伦理和研究伦理委员会的知识和态度：一项横断面研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Jun 28;23(1):482. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04459-y.
5
Perceptions of Pharmacy Graduate Students Toward Research Ethics Education: A Cross-Sectional Study from a Developing Country.药学研究生对研究伦理教育的认知：来自发展中国家的横断面研究。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2022 Oct 26;28(6):47. doi: 10.1007/s11948-022-00406-0.
6
Motivators and barriers towards clinical research participation: A population-based survey from an Arab MENA country.参与临床研究的动机和障碍：来自阿拉伯 MENA 国家的一项基于人群的调查。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 24;17(6):e0270300. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270300. eCollection 2022.
7
Informed Consent Form Challenges for Genetic Research in Jordan.约旦基因研究中的知情同意书挑战
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2020 Mar 5;13:235-239. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S243669. eCollection 2020.
本文引用的文献
1
Clinical research ethics review process in Lebanon: efficiency and functions of research ethics committees - results from a descriptive questionnaire-based study.黎巴嫩的临床研究伦理审查过程：研究伦理委员会的效率与职能——基于描述性问卷调查研究的结果
Trials. 2018 Jan 11;19(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2397-2.
2
II. MORE THAN JUST CONVENIENT: THE SCIENTIFIC MERITS OF HOMOGENEOUS CONVENIENCE SAMPLES.二、不仅仅是方便：同质便利样本的科学价值。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2017 Jun;82(2):13-30. doi: 10.1111/mono.12296.
3
Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition.21世纪的学术研究：在不当激励和过度竞争环境下保持科学诚信
Environ Eng Sci. 2017 Jan 1;34(1):51-61. doi: 10.1089/ees.2016.0223.
4
Opportunities and barriers to enhance research capacity and outputs among academic family physicians in the Arab world.阿拉伯世界学术家庭医生提升研究能力与产出的机遇和障碍。
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2016 Jan;17(1):98-104. doi: 10.1017/S1463423615000377.
5
Institutional Review Boards: Purpose and Challenges.机构审查委员会：目的与挑战。
Chest. 2015 Nov;148(5):1148-1155. doi: 10.1378/chest.15-0706.
6
"Protecting" or "Policing": Academic Researchers' View of IRBs in an Arab Context.“保护”还是“监管”：阿拉伯背景下学术研究者对机构审查委员会的看法
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2014 Dec;9(5):25-35. doi: 10.1177/1556264614553170. Epub 2014 Oct 7.
7
Assessing Institutional Ethics Committees in India Using the IRB-RAT.使用IRB-RAT评估印度的机构伦理委员会。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2014 Oct;9(4):50-9. doi: 10.1177/1556264614544101. Epub 2014 Aug 5.
8
Is your ethics committee efficient? Using "IRB Metrics" as a self-assessment tool for continuous improvement at the Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Thailand.你的伦理委员会高效吗？使用“机构审查委员会指标”作为泰国玛希隆大学热带医学院持续改进的自我评估工具。
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 18;9(11):e113356. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113356. eCollection 2014.
9
Overview on health research ethics in Egypt and North Africa.埃及和北非的健康研究伦理概述。
Eur J Public Health. 2014 Aug;24 Suppl 1:87-91. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cku110.
10
Publish or perish: Where are we heading?不发表就灭亡：我们正走向何方？
J Res Med Sci. 2014 Feb;19(2):87-9.
Zotero 插件