Suppr超能文献

SYNTAX研究中SYNTAX评分的评估。

Assessment of the SYNTAX score in the Syntax study.

作者信息

Serruys Patrick W, Onuma Yoshinobu, Garg Scot, Sarno Giovanna, van den Brand Marcel, Kappetein Arie-Pieter, Van Dyck Nic, Mack Michael, Holmes David, Feldman Ted, Morice Marie-Claude, Colombo Antonio, Bass Eric, Leadley Katrin, Dawkins Keith D, van Es Gerrit-Anne, Morel Marie-Angèle M, Mohr Friedrich W

机构信息

Department of Interventional Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Thoraxcenter Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

EuroIntervention. 2009 May;5(1):50-6. doi: 10.4244/eijv5i1a9.

Abstract

AIMS

The SYNTAX score has been designed to better anticipate the risks of percutaneous or surgical revascularisation, taking into account the functional impact of the coronary circulation with all its anatomic components including the presence of bifurcations, total occlusions, thrombus, calcification, and small vessels. The purpose of this paper is to describe the baseline assessment of the SYNTAX score in the Syntax randomised trial, the corelab reproducibility, the potential difference in score assessment between the investigator and the corelab, and to ascertain the impact on one-year outcome after either percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) in patients with complex coronary artery disease.

METHODS AND RESULTS

To assess the reliability of Syntax scoring, 100 diagnostic angiograms from the Syntax trial were randomly selected and assessed independently by two observers. Intra-observer variability was assessed by analysing 91 sets of angiograms after an interval of at least eight weeks by one of the observers. Clinical outcomes in the randomised cohort of the Syntax trial up to one year are presented with stratification by tertile group of the SYNTAX score. The weighted kappa value for the inter-observer reproducibility on the global score was 0.45, while the intra-observer weighted kappa value was 0.59. The SYNTAX score as calculated by investigators consistently underscored the corelab score by 3.4 points. When the Syntax randomised cohort was stratified by tertiles of the SYNTAX score, there were similar or non-significantly different MACCE rates in those with low or intermediate scores; however in the top tertile the MACCE rate was greater in those receiving PCI compared to CABG.

CONCLUSIONS

The SYNTAX score is a visual coronary score with an acceptable corelab reproducibility that has an impact on the one-year outcome of those having PCI, whereas it has no effect on the one-year outcome following surgical revascularisation. The SYNTAX score tool is likely to be useful in a wide range of patients with complex coronary disease.

摘要

目的

SYNTAX评分旨在更准确地预测经皮或外科血管重建的风险,该评分考虑了冠状动脉循环及其所有解剖成分(包括分叉、完全闭塞、血栓、钙化和小血管)的功能影响。本文的目的是描述SYNTAX随机试验中SYNTAX评分的基线评估、核心实验室的可重复性、研究者与核心实验室在评分评估上的潜在差异,并确定其对复杂冠状动脉疾病患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)或冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)后一年结局的影响。

方法与结果

为评估SYNTAX评分的可靠性,从SYNTAX试验中随机选取10组诊断性血管造影片,由两名观察者独立评估。一名观察者在至少间隔八周后分析91组血管造影片,评估观察者内变异性。SYNTAX试验随机队列中直至一年的临床结局按SYNTAX评分三分位数分组进行分层呈现。整体评分的观察者间可重复性加权kappa值为0.45,而观察者内加权kappa值为0.59。研究者计算的SYNTAX评分始终比核心实验室评分低3.4分。当SYNTAX随机队列按SYNTAX评分三分位数分层时,低或中等评分者的主要不良心血管和脑血管事件(MACCE)发生率相似或无显著差异;然而,在最高三分位数组中,接受PCI者的MACCE发生率高于接受CABG者。

结论

SYNTAX评分是一种视觉冠状动脉评分,核心实验室具有可接受的可重复性,对接受PCI者的一年结局有影响,而对手术血管重建后的一年结局无影响。SYNTAX评分工具可能对广泛的复杂冠状动脉疾病患者有用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验