Suppr超能文献

估计程序会影响压力中心频率分析。

Estimation procedures affect the center of pressure frequency analysis.

机构信息

Laboratorio di Ingegneria del Sistema Neuromuscolare, Politecnico di Torino, Torino, TO, Italia.

出版信息

Braz J Med Biol Res. 2009 Jul;42(7):665-73. doi: 10.1590/s0100-879x2009000700012.

Abstract

Even though frequency analysis of body sway is widely applied in clinical studies, the lack of standardized procedures concerning power spectrum estimation may provide unreliable descriptors. Stabilometric tests were applied to 35 subjects (20-51 years, 54-95 kg, 1.6-1.9 m) and the power spectral density function was estimated for the anterior-posterior center of pressure time series. The median frequency was compared between power spectra estimated according to signal partitioning, sampling rate, test duration, and detrending methods. The median frequency reliability for different test durations was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient. When increasing number of segments, shortening test duration or applying linear detrending, the median frequency values increased significantly up to 137%. Even the shortest test duration provided reliable estimates as observed with the intraclass coefficient (0.74-0.89 confidence interval for a single 20-s test). Clinical assessment of balance may benefit from a standardized protocol for center of pressure spectral analysis that provides an adequate relationship between resolution and variance. An algorithm to estimate center of pressure power density spectrum is also proposed.

摘要

尽管身体摇晃的频率分析在临床研究中得到广泛应用,但缺乏有关功率谱估计的标准化程序可能会提供不可靠的描述符。对 35 名受试者(20-51 岁,54-95 千克,1.6-1.9 米)进行了稳定测试,并对前-后中心压力时间序列的功率谱密度函数进行了估计。根据信号分割、采样率、测试持续时间和去趋势方法估计的功率谱之间比较了中值频率。使用组内相关系数评估了不同测试持续时间的中值频率可靠性。当增加段数、缩短测试持续时间或应用线性去趋势时,中值频率值显著增加,最高可达 137%。即使是最短的测试持续时间也提供了可靠的估计,如组内系数所示(单个 20 秒测试的置信区间为 0.74-0.89)。平衡的临床评估可能受益于中心压力频谱分析的标准化协议,该协议提供了分辨率和方差之间的适当关系。还提出了一种估计中心压力功率密度谱的算法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验