Kelso J M, Sodhi N, Gosselin V A, Yunginger J W
Department of Pediatrics, Mayo Medical School, Rochester, Minnesota.
Ann Allergy. 1991 Nov;67(5):511-4.
Results from three in vitro assays for allergen-specific IgE, the standard Phadebas radioallergosorbent test (PhRAST), modified RAST (mRAST), and the new Pharmacia CAP System (CAP) were compared with skin prick testing (SPT) results in 104 patients with allergic rhinitis and/or asthma and 24 nonatopic controls. Five allergens were evaluated: cat, Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, Alternaria, June grass, and short ragweed. Using SPT results as the reference standard, the PhRAST had the lowest sensitivity (62%) and highest specificity (99%). The CAP achieved higher sensitivity (74%) with comparable specificity (96%) while the mRAST had even higher sensitivity (90%) but lower specificity (87%). The overall frequency of positive results in controls was 0% for PhRAST, 1.7% for CAP, and 3.3% for mRAST. If the threshold for a positive mRAST was raised to greater than or equal to class 2, this assay achieved performance characteristics similar to the CAP. If the results of these in vitro tests are used as the sole guide to the prescription of environmental control and immunotherapy in unselected patients with rhinitis and asthma, the performance characteristics of the CAP make it the preferred test.
对104例过敏性鼻炎和/或哮喘患者以及24例非特应性对照者,比较了三种过敏原特异性IgE体外检测方法的结果,即标准的Phadebas放射变应原吸附试验(PhRAST)、改良的RAST(mRAST)和新的Pharmacia CAP系统(CAP),并与皮肤点刺试验(SPT)结果进行了比较。评估了五种过敏原:猫、屋尘螨、链格孢属、六月禾和豚草。以SPT结果作为参考标准,PhRAST的敏感性最低(62%),特异性最高(99%)。CAP的敏感性较高(74%),特异性相当(96%),而mRAST的敏感性更高(90%),但特异性较低(87%)。对照者中PhRAST阳性结果的总体频率为0%,CAP为1.7%,mRAST为3.3%。如果将mRAST阳性的阈值提高到大于或等于2级,该检测方法的性能特征与CAP相似。如果将这些体外检测结果用作未经过选择的鼻炎和哮喘患者环境控制和免疫治疗处方的唯一指导,CAP的性能特征使其成为首选检测方法。