Zhang Yuqing, Zhang Bin, Wise Barton, Niu Jingbo, Zhu Yanyan
Clinical Epidemiology Research and Training Unit, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts 02118, USA.
Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2009 Sep;21(5):513-9. doi: 10.1097/BOR.0b013e32832ed69d.
We describe commonly used measures of knee pain in longitudinal studies and review various analytic approaches to evaluating the effect of a risk factor on each type of pain measure.
In longitudinal epidemiologic studies of knee pain, frequent knee pain and activity-related pain severity are the most commonly used measures for pain. Various analytic approaches have been used to evaluate the effect of a risk factor on each type of pain measure. Analytic approaches utilized include the generalized estimating equations model and the mixed-effects linear regression model for pain severity assessed as a continuous outcome variable, the mixed-effects logistic regression model and conditional logistic regression model for pain exacerbation measured as a dichotomous outcome variable, and a mixed-effects regression model, stratified proportional odds model, and a multistate transition model for pain severity measured as an ordinal outcome variable.
Compared with cross-sectional studies, longitudinal studies allow investigators to assess the effect of change in a risk factor of interest on change in risk of knee pain or change in pain severity. With appropriate analysis methods, investigators are able to minimize potential confounders that differ among individuals or knees but which do not vary over time within a person or knee.
我们描述了纵向研究中常用的膝关节疼痛测量方法,并回顾了评估风险因素对每种疼痛测量方法影响的各种分析方法。
在膝关节疼痛的纵向流行病学研究中,频繁的膝关节疼痛和与活动相关的疼痛严重程度是最常用的疼痛测量指标。已使用各种分析方法来评估风险因素对每种疼痛测量指标的影响。所采用的分析方法包括将疼痛严重程度评估为连续结果变量时使用的广义估计方程模型和混合效应线性回归模型;将疼痛加重测量为二分结果变量时使用的混合效应逻辑回归模型和条件逻辑回归模型;以及将疼痛严重程度测量为有序结果变量时使用的混合效应回归模型、分层比例优势模型和多状态转换模型。
与横断面研究相比,纵向研究使研究者能够评估感兴趣的风险因素变化对膝关节疼痛风险变化或疼痛严重程度变化的影响。通过适当的分析方法,研究者能够将个体或膝关节之间存在差异但在一个人或膝关节内不随时间变化的潜在混杂因素降至最低。