Pote D H, Way T R, Sistani K R, Moore P A
USDA-ARS, Dale Bumpers Small Farms Research Center, 6883 South State Hwy. 23, Booneville, AR 72927, United States.
J Environ Manage. 2009 Aug;90(11):3534-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.06.006. Epub 2009 Jul 7.
Poultry litter is known to be an excellent organic fertilizer, but the common practice of spreading litter on the surface of pastures has raised serious water-quality concerns and may limit potential benefits of litter applications. Because surface-applied litter is completely exposed to the atmosphere, runoff can transport nutrients into nearby streams and lakes, and much of the ammonium nitrogen volatilizes before it can enter the soil. Our previous research showed that a manual knifing technique to apply dry litter under a perennial pasture surface effectively prevented about 90% of nutrient loss with runoff from surface-applied litter, and tended to increase forage yield. However, this technique (known as subsurface banding) cannot become a practical management option for producers until it is mechanized. To begin that process, we tested an experimental single-shank, tractor-drawn implement designed to apply poultry litter in subsurface bands. Our objective was to compare this mechanized subsurface-banding method against conventional surface application to determine effects on nutrient loss with runoff from a perennial grassland treated with dry poultry litter. Early in the growing season, broiler litter was applied (6.7 dry-weight Mgha(-1)) to each plot (except three control plots) using one of two application methods: surface broadcast manually or subsurface banded using the tractor-drawn implement. Simulated rainfall (5cmh(-1)) generated 20min of runoff from each plot for volume and analytical measurements. Results showed that subsurface-banded litter increased forage yield while decreasing nutrient (e.g. N and P) loss in runoff by at least 90% compared to surface-broadcast litter.
家禽粪便已知是一种优质有机肥料,但在牧场表面撒施粪便的常见做法引发了严重的水质问题,且可能限制了粪便施用的潜在益处。由于地表施用的粪便完全暴露于大气中,径流会将养分输送到附近的溪流和湖泊,并且大部分铵态氮在进入土壤之前就挥发了。我们之前的研究表明,在多年生牧场地表下采用手工开沟技术施用干粪便,可有效防止约90%的养分随地表施用粪便产生的径流流失,并且往往会提高牧草产量。然而,在实现机械化之前,这种技术(称为地下条施)无法成为生产者实际可行的管理选项。为了启动这一进程,我们测试了一种实验性的单柄、牵引式机具,其设计目的是在地下条带中施用家禽粪便。我们的目标是将这种机械化地下条施方法与传统地表施用方法进行比较,以确定其对施用干家禽粪便的多年生草地径流养分流失的影响。在生长季节早期,使用以下两种施用方法之一(除三个对照地块外),将肉鸡粪便施用于每个地块(6.7干重Mg·ha⁻¹):人工地面撒播或使用牵引式机具进行地下条施。模拟降雨(5厘米·小时⁻¹)使每个地块产生20分钟的径流,用于体积和分析测量。结果表明,与地面撒播粪便相比,地下条施粪便提高了牧草产量,同时使径流中的养分(如氮和磷)流失减少了至少90%。