Suppr超能文献

保护管理措施可减少放牧牧场的非点源污染。

Conservation management practices reduce non-point source pollution from grazed pastures.

作者信息

Ashworth Amanda J, Moore Philip A, Pote Dan H, Owens Phillip R, Martin Jerry W, Anderson Kelsey R

机构信息

USDA-ARS, Poultry Production and Product Safety Research Unit, 1260 W. Maple Dr. Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.

USDA-ARS, Dale Bumpers Small Farms Research Center, 6883 South Highway 23, Booneville, AR, 72927, USA.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2021 Feb 11;7(2):e06238. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06238. eCollection 2021 Feb.

Abstract

Producers in Northwest Arkansas and globally need alternative management practices to ensure long-term sustainable and economical use of poultry litter, which is an abundant source of valuable carbon (C), nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P). Project objectives were to measure the efficacy of conservation management practices (i.e., pasture aeration and subsurface litter incorporation) to reduce nutrient runoff compared to poultry litter surface applications from small watersheds under rainfed and grazed conditions. Watersheds (0.23 ha each) were assigned a treatment [pasture aeration, subsurface litter incorporation, or surface application of litter (positive control)] on a Leadvale (fine-silty, siliceous, thermic Typic Fragiudult) silt loam. Poultry litter was applied annually to each watershed from 2007-2012. Over the 4-yr study period, runoff loads of NO-N, total nitrogen (TN), soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP), and total phosphorus (TP) varied per conservation practice ( ≤ 0.05). Specifically, average annual loads of NO-N, TN, SRP, and TP loads were reduced 49, 42, 28, and 35% following pasture aeration and by 78, 72, 55, and 59% from subsurface applying poultry litter, relative to surface applications, respectively. Greatest annual N loads and runoff corresponded with surface poultry litter applications, followed by pasture aeration, with subsurface incorporation of poultry litter resulting in lowest ( ≤ 0.05) TN and NO-N loads. Overall, subsurface incorporation of poultry litter and pasture aeration are two promising conservation practices for reducing non-point source pollution in watersheds with nutrient imbalances. Further work needs to be done on factors influencing the efficacy of these conservation practices under rainfed conditions, as well as the economic feasibility of these conservation agricultural practices.

摘要

阿肯色州西北部以及全球的家禽养殖者都需要采用替代性管理措施,以确保长期可持续且经济地利用家禽粪便,因为家禽粪便富含宝贵的碳(C)、氮(N)和磷(P)。项目目标是,在雨养和放牧条件下,从小流域层面衡量保护性管理措施(即牧场通气和地下埋入粪便)相较于家禽粪便地表施用,在减少养分径流方面的效果。在莱德维尔粉质壤土(细粉质、硅质、热性典型脆磐老成土)上,为各个流域(每个流域0.23公顷)分配一种处理方式[牧场通气、地下埋入粪便或粪便地表施用(阳性对照)]。2007年至2012年期间,每年都向各个流域施家禽粪便。在为期4年的研究期内,不同保护性措施下,硝态氮(NO-N)、总氮(TN)、可溶性活性磷(SRP)和总磷(TP)的径流负荷有所不同(P≤0.05)。具体而言,与地表施用相比,牧场通气后,NO-N、TN、SRP和TP的年均负荷分别降低了49%、42%、28%和35%;地下埋入家禽粪便后,这些指标分别降低了78%、72%、55%和59%。年度氮负荷和径流量最高的是家禽粪便地表施用,其次是牧场通气,地下埋入家禽粪便导致TN和NO-N负荷最低(P≤0.05)。总体而言,地下埋入家禽粪便和牧场通气是减少养分失衡流域面源污染的两种很有前景的保护性措施。对于影响这些保护性措施在雨养条件下效果的因素,以及这些保护性农业措施的经济可行性,还需要开展进一步研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a52/7892925/6e2f3c7acfb9/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验