Parchman Michael L, Munoz Abel
Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
J Am Board Fam Med. 2009 Jul-Aug;22(4):375-9. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2009.04.090003.
To examine skin and soft tissue infections presenting at 4 primary care clinics and assess if historical risk factors and examination findings were associated with a positive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) culture.
During the 10-month observational study (April 2007 through January 2008), physicians in 5 practices across South Texas collected history, physical examination findings, culture results, and antibiotic(s) prescribed for all patients presenting with a skin or soft tissue infection. Analyses were conducted to determine the relationship between historical indicators, location of lesions, and examination findings with a positive MRSA culture.
Across 4 practices, 164 cases of skin and soft tissue infections were collected during 10 months. Of the 94 with a culture, 63 (67%) were MRSA positive. Patients working in or exposed to a health care setting were more likely to have a culture positive for MRSA, as were those presenting with an abscess. MRSA-positive lesions were also significantly smaller in size.
Because of the high prevalence of MRSA skin and soft tissue infections among patients presenting to family physicians, presumptive treatment for MRSA may be indicated. However, increasing levels of resistance to current antibiotics is concerning and warrants development of alternative management strategies.
检查4家基层医疗诊所出现的皮肤及软组织感染情况,并评估既往危险因素和检查结果是否与耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)培养阳性相关。
在为期10个月的观察性研究(2007年4月至2008年1月)期间,南德克萨斯州5家医疗机构的医生收集了所有出现皮肤或软组织感染患者的病史、体格检查结果、培养结果以及所开具的抗生素。进行分析以确定既往指标、病变部位和检查结果与MRSA培养阳性之间的关系。
在4家医疗机构中,10个月内共收集到164例皮肤及软组织感染病例。在94例进行培养的病例中,63例(67%)MRSA培养呈阳性。在医疗环境中工作或接触过医疗环境的患者,以及出现脓肿的患者,MRSA培养呈阳性的可能性更大。MRSA阳性病变的大小也明显更小。
由于家庭医生接诊的患者中MRSA皮肤及软组织感染的患病率较高,可能需要对MRSA进行经验性治疗。然而,对当前抗生素的耐药性不断增加令人担忧,因此有必要制定替代管理策略。