Bamigboye Anthony A, Hofmeyr G Justus
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mediclinic Private Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Witwatersrand, PO Box 15184, Nelspruit, Mpumalanga, South Africa, 1200.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 8(3):CD006954. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006954.pub2.
Caesarean section delivery is becoming more frequent. Childbirth is an emotion-filled event and the mother needs to bond with her newborn baby as early as possible. Any intervention that leads to improvement in pain relief is worthy of investigation. Local anaesthetics, either on their own or in combination with opioids or nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, have been employed as an adjunct to other postoperative pain relief strategies. Conflicting reports were noted.
To assess the effects of local anaesthetic agent wound infiltration/irrIgation and/or abdominal nerve blocks on post-caesarean section pain and the mother's well being and interaction with her baby.
We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (April 2009).
Randomised controlled trials of pre-emptive local analgesia during caesarean section.
One author extracted data. The second author checked the data.
Twenty studies (1150 women) were included. Women who had caesarean section performed under regional analgesia and had wound infiltration had a decrease in morphine consumption at 24 hours (SMD -1.70mg; 95% confidence interval (CI) -2.75 to -0.94) compared to placebo.In women under general anaesthesia, with caesarean section wound infiltration and peritoneal spraying with local anaesthetic (one study, 100 participants), the need for opioid rescue was reduced (risk ratio (RR) 0.51; 95% CI 0.38 to 0.69). The numerical pain score (0 to10) within the first hour was also reduced (mean difference (MD) -1.46; 95% CI -2.60 to -0.32).Women with regional analgesia who had local anaesthetic and non-steriodal anti-inflammatory cocktail wound infiltration consumed less morphine (one study, 60 participants; MD -7.40 mg; 95% CI -9.58 to -5.22) compared to local anaesthetic control.Women who had regional analgesia with abdominal nerves blocked had decreased opioid consumption (four studies, 175 participants; MD -25.80 mg; 95% CI -50.39 to -5.37).For the outcome of visual analogue scale 0 to 10 over 24 hours, no advantage was demonstrated in the single study of 50 participants who had wound infiltrated with a mixture of local analgesia and narcotics versus local analgesia.Addition of ketamine to the local analgesia in women who had regional analgesia does not confer any advantage.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Local analgesia infiltration and abdominal nerve blocks as adjuncts to regional analgesia and general anaesthesia are of benefit in caesarean section by reducing opioid consumption. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs as an adjuvant may confer additional pain relief.
剖宫产分娩越来越常见。分娩是一个充满情感的事件,母亲需要尽早与新生儿建立亲密关系。任何能够改善疼痛缓解的干预措施都值得研究。局部麻醉药单独使用或与阿片类药物或非甾体抗炎药联合使用,已被用作其他术后疼痛缓解策略的辅助手段。但有相互矛盾的报道。
评估局部麻醉药伤口浸润/冲洗和/或腹部神经阻滞对剖宫产术后疼痛以及母亲的健康状况和与婴儿互动的影响。
我们检索了Cochrane妊娠与分娩组试验注册库(2009年4月)。
剖宫产术中预防性局部镇痛的随机对照试验。
由一位作者提取数据。第二位作者检查数据。
纳入了20项研究(1150名女性)。与安慰剂相比,在区域镇痛下进行剖宫产且有伤口浸润的女性,24小时吗啡消耗量减少(标准化均数差-1.70mg;95%置信区间(CI)-2.75至-0.94)。在全身麻醉下进行剖宫产且有伤口浸润和局部麻醉药腹腔喷洒的女性中(一项研究,100名参与者),阿片类药物急救需求减少(风险比(RR)0.51;95%CI 0.38至0.69)。术后第一小时的数字疼痛评分(0至10分)也降低了(平均差(MD)-1.46;95%CI -2.60至-0.32)。与局部麻醉药对照组相比,接受区域镇痛且有局部麻醉药和非甾体抗炎鸡尾酒伤口浸润的女性吗啡消耗量更少(一项研究,60名参与者;MD -7.40mg;95%CI -9.58至-5.22)。接受区域镇痛且腹部神经阻滞的女性阿片类药物消耗量减少(四项研究,175名参与者;MD -25.80mg;95%CI -50.39至-5.37)。对于24小时视觉模拟评分0至10分的结果,在一项50名参与者的研究中,局部镇痛和麻醉药混合物伤口浸润组与局部镇痛组相比未显示出优势。在接受区域镇痛的女性中,在局部镇痛中添加氯胺酮没有任何优势。
局部镇痛浸润和腹部神经阻滞作为区域镇痛和全身麻醉的辅助手段,通过减少阿片类药物的消耗,在剖宫产中是有益的。非甾体抗炎药作为辅助药物可能会带来额外的疼痛缓解。