Suppr超能文献

监管残留控制中方法验证的法规意义。

The validation of methods for regulatory purposes in the control of residues.

机构信息

Federal Office of Consumer Protection and Food Safety (BVL), EC Community Reference Laboratory for Residues, D-10832 Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

J Chromatogr A. 2009 Nov 13;1216(46):8051-8. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2009.06.059. Epub 2009 Jun 23.

Abstract

The topic of validation is diversified. This review outlines the validation strategies which can be found in national, international and supranational regulations, compares them with one another and aims to elaborate on the main principles. European regulations and legislation, Codex alimentarius guidelines, the official methods program of the AOAC, and naturally the relevant ISO standards, particularly the ISO 5725 series, are taken into consideration. The objective of every validation is to demonstrate fitness for purpose. This varies of course in its characteristics for the diverse uses. However, all approaches have in common the objective of harmonisation of food control by using effective and reliable methods. To this end, criteria are determined and validation models developed and made compulsory. ISO 5725 is the central basis for validations for quantitative methods with its validation specifications through method collaborative studies. On the contrary, there are no valid uniform international method specifications for qualitative methods. Collaborative studies are in opposition to single-lab-validations with different sources of error. Whereas laboratory errors are predominant in collaborative studies, the single-lab-validation or in-house validation concentrates particularly on time and processing errors (intermediate precision). In new statistical models for in-house validations, the matrix mismatch error is also considered. The validation models presented here are of a general nature and can be used in principle for all analytical methods. Correct and appropriate statistical modelling is very important.

摘要

验证的主题是多样化的。本综述概述了可以在国家、国际和超国家法规中找到的验证策略,对它们进行了比较,并旨在详细阐述主要原则。考虑了欧洲法规和立法、食品法典委员会指南、AOAC 的官方方法计划,以及自然相关的 ISO 标准,特别是 ISO 5725 系列。每个验证的目的都是证明适用于特定目的。当然,由于不同用途的特点,其适用性也有所不同。然而,所有方法都有一个共同的目标,即通过使用有效和可靠的方法来协调食品控制。为此,确定了标准,并制定和强制实施了验证模型。ISO 5725 是定量方法验证的核心基础,通过方法协作研究提供验证规范。相反,定性方法没有有效的统一国际方法规范。协作研究与具有不同误差源的单实验室验证相反。虽然协作研究中主要存在实验室误差,但单实验室验证或内部验证特别侧重于时间和处理误差(中间精密度)。在新的内部验证统计模型中,还考虑了基质不匹配误差。这里提出的验证模型具有普遍性,原则上可用于所有分析方法。正确和适当的统计建模非常重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验