Tiihonen Jari, Lönnqvist Jouko, Wahlbeck Kristian, Klaukka Timo, Niskanen Leo, Tanskanen Antti, Haukka Jari
Department of Forensic Psychiatry, University of Kuopio and Niuvanniemi Hospital, Department of Clinical Physiology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.
Lancet. 2009 Aug 22;374(9690):620-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60742-X.
The introduction of second-generation antipsychotic drugs during the 1990s is widely believed to have adversely affected mortality of patients with schizophrenia. Our aim was to establish the long-term contribution of antipsychotic drugs to mortality in such patients.
Nationwide registers in Finland were used to compare the cause-specific mortality in 66 881 patients versus the total population (5.2 million) between 1996, and 2006, and to link these data with the use of antipsychotic drugs. We measured the all-cause mortality of patients with schizophrenia in outpatient care during current and cumulative exposure to any antipsychotic drug versus no use of these drugs, and exposure to the six most frequently used antipsychotic drugs compared with perphenazine use.
Although the proportional use of second-generation antipsychotic drugs rose from 13% to 64% during follow-up, the gap in life expectancy between patients with schizophrenia and the general population did not widen between 1996 (25 years), and 2006 (22.5 years). Compared with current use of perphenazine, the highest risk for overall mortality was recorded for quetiapine (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.41, 95% CI 1.09-1.82), and the lowest risk for clozapine (0.74, 0.60-0.91; p=0.0045 for the difference between clozapine vs perphenazine, and p<0.0001 for all other antipsychotic drugs). Long-term cumulative exposure (7-11 years) to any antipsychotic treatment was associated with lower mortality than was no drug use (0.81, 0.77-0.84). In patients with one or more filled prescription for an antipsychotic drug, an inverse relation between mortality and duration of cumulative use was noted (HR for trend per exposure year 0.991; 0.985-0.997).
Long-term treatment with antipsychotic drugs is associated with lower mortality compared with no antipsychotic use. Second-generation drugs are a highly heterogeneous group, and clozapine seems to be associated with a substantially lower mortality than any other antipsychotics. Restrictions on the use of clozapine should be reassessed.
Annual EVO Financing (Special government subsidies from the Ministry of Health and Welfare, Finland).
人们普遍认为,20世纪90年代第二代抗精神病药物的引入对精神分裂症患者的死亡率产生了不利影响。我们的目的是确定抗精神病药物对这类患者死亡率的长期影响。
利用芬兰全国性登记系统,比较了1996年至2006年期间66881名患者与总人口(520万)的死因别死亡率,并将这些数据与抗精神病药物的使用情况相关联。我们测量了在当前和累积使用任何抗精神病药物与未使用这些药物的情况下,门诊治疗的精神分裂症患者的全因死亡率,以及与使用奋乃静相比,六种最常用抗精神病药物的使用情况。
尽管在随访期间第二代抗精神病药物的使用比例从13%上升到64%,但1996年(25年)至2006年(22.5年)期间,精神分裂症患者与普通人群之间的预期寿命差距并未扩大。与当前使用奋乃静相比,总体死亡率最高的是喹硫平(调整后的风险比[HR]1.41,95%可信区间1.09-1.82),最低的是氯氮平(0.74,0.60-0.91;氯氮平与奋乃静之间差异的p值为0.0045,所有其他抗精神病药物的p值<0.0001)。与未使用药物相比,长期累积暴露(7-11年)于任何抗精神病治疗与较低的死亡率相关(0.81,0.77-0.84)。在有一张或多张抗精神病药物处方的患者中,观察到死亡率与累积使用时间呈负相关(每暴露年趋势的HR为0.991;0.985-0.997)。
与不使用抗精神病药物相比,长期使用抗精神病药物与较低的死亡率相关。第二代药物是一个高度异质性的群体,氯氮平似乎与比任何其他抗精神病药物都低得多的死亡率相关。应重新评估对氯氮平使用的限制。
年度EVO资助(芬兰卫生和福利部的特别政府补贴)。