University Psychiatric Center, Catholic University Leuven, Campus Kortenberg, Belgium.
Schizophr Res. 2010 Mar;117(1):68-74. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2009.12.029. Epub 2010 Jan 12.
Compared to the general population, people with schizophrenia are at risk of dying prematurely due to suicide and due to different somatic illnesses. The potential role of antipsychotic treatment in affecting suicide rates and in explaining the increased mortality due to somatic disorders is highly debated. A recent study of death registers in Finland compared the cause-specific mortality in 66,881 patients versus the total population (5.2 million) between 1996 and 2006, suggesting that antipsychotic use decreased all-cause mortality compared to no antipsychotic use in patients with schizophrenia, and that clozapine had the most beneficial profile in this regard (Tiihonen et al., 2009). The benefits of clozapine were conferred by significant protective effects for suicide compared to perphenazine, whereas, a mixed group of 'other' antipsychotics, haloperidol, quetiapine and risperidone were reported to be associated with significantly higher all-cause mortality than perphenazine. By contrast, despite known differences in effects on cardiovascular risk factors, there were no significant differences between any of the examined antipsychotics regarding death due to ischemic heart disease. A number of methodological and conceptual issues make the interpretation of these findings problematic, including incomplete reporting of data, questionable selection of drug groups and comparisons, important unmeasured risk factors, inadequate control for potentially confounding variables, exclusion of deaths occurring during hospitalization leading to exclusion of 64% of deaths on current antipsychotics from the analysis, and survivorship bias due to strong and systematic differences in illness duration across the treatment groups. Well designed, prospective mortality studies, with direct measurement of and adjustment for all known relevant risk factors for premature mortality, are needed to identify risk and protective medication and patient factors and to, ultimately, inform clinical practice.
与普通人群相比,精神分裂症患者由于自杀和不同躯体疾病而面临过早死亡的风险。抗精神病药物治疗在影响自杀率和解释躯体疾病导致的死亡率增加方面的潜在作用存在很大争议。最近一项对芬兰死亡登记处的研究比较了 1996 年至 2006 年间 66881 例患者与总人口(520 万)的特定原因死亡率,结果表明,与未使用抗精神病药物的精神分裂症患者相比,使用抗精神病药物可降低全因死亡率,氯氮平在这方面具有最有益的特征(Tiihonen 等人,2009 年)。与奋乃静相比,氯氮平的益处归因于自杀的显著保护作用,而混合组的“其他”抗精神病药物、氟哌啶醇、喹硫平和利培酮与奋乃静相比,被报道与全因死亡率显著升高相关。相比之下,尽管在心血管危险因素方面存在已知的差异,但在任何检查的抗精神病药物中,都没有发现与缺血性心脏病死亡相关的显著差异。这些发现的解释存在许多方法学和概念问题,包括数据报告不完整、药物组和比较的选择可疑、重要的未测量风险因素、对潜在混杂变量的控制不足、排除住院期间导致的死亡,导致目前抗精神病药物分析中排除了 64%的死亡,以及由于治疗组之间疾病持续时间存在强烈和系统差异而导致的生存偏差。需要设计良好的前瞻性死亡率研究,直接测量和调整所有已知的与过早死亡相关的风险因素,以确定风险和保护药物和患者因素,并最终为临床实践提供信息。