• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

焦点小组在评估营养教育材料中的应用。

Use of focus groups in evaluating nutrition education materials.

作者信息

Trenkner L L, Achterberg C L

机构信息

Division of Epidemiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55455.

出版信息

J Am Diet Assoc. 1991 Dec;91(12):1577-81.

PMID:1960352
Abstract

Focus groups were used to study public reaction to the nutrition education material, Dietary Guidelines for Americans, US Department of Agriculture bulletin HG232. Respondents were asked to comment specifically on the content and format of bulletin HG232 and to compare it with several other commonly used nutrition education print materials. The focus group discussions were recorded on videotape and the information was analyzed by two independent reviews of the tapes. The focus groups produced good information on perceived usability of a variety of nutrition education print materials and made specific suggestions for improving HG232. Although there are limitations to using focus groups as a data collection technique (data are not quantitative, making data analysis difficult; responses are influenced by group dynamics; and some suggestions made by the group are not appropriate), the richness and innovativeness of the data collected make focus groups a worthwhile evaluation method for nutritionists.

摘要

焦点小组被用于研究公众对营养教育材料《美国人膳食指南》(美国农业部公告HG232)的反应。研究人员要求受访者具体评价HG232公告的内容和形式,并将其与其他几种常用的营养教育印刷材料进行比较。焦点小组讨论被录制在录像带上,信息由两名独立的录像带审查人员进行分析。焦点小组提供了有关各种营养教育印刷材料可感知可用性的良好信息,并对改进HG232提出了具体建议。尽管将焦点小组作为一种数据收集技术存在局限性(数据不是定量的,数据分析困难;回答受到群体动态的影响;并且小组提出的一些建议不合适),但所收集数据的丰富性和创新性使焦点小组成为营养学家值得采用的一种评估方法。

相似文献

1
Use of focus groups in evaluating nutrition education materials.焦点小组在评估营养教育材料中的应用。
J Am Diet Assoc. 1991 Dec;91(12):1577-81.
2
Primary care providers need a variety of nutrition and wellness patient education materials.初级保健提供者需要各种营养与健康患者教育材料。
J Am Diet Assoc. 1999 Apr;99(4):462-6. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(99)00113-3.
3
Assessing nutrition education wants and needs of older adults through focus groups.通过焦点小组评估老年人的营养教育需求和愿望。
J Nutr Elder. 2003;23(2):77-91. doi: 10.1300/J052v23n02_06.
4
Using a focus group approach to determine older adults' opinions and attitudes toward a nutrition education program.采用焦点小组方法来确定老年人对营养教育项目的看法和态度。
J Nutr Elder. 2004;23(3):55-72. doi: 10.1300/J052v23n03_04.
5
Factors influencing nutrition education for patients with low literacy skills.影响低识字技能患者营养教育的因素。
J Am Diet Assoc. 1998 May;98(5):559-64. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(98)00125-4.
6
Effectiveness of videotaped dietary instruction for patients hospitalized with cardiovascular disease.心血管疾病住院患者的录像饮食指导效果
J Am Diet Assoc. 1992 Oct;92(10):1268-70.
7
South-east Asia: curriculum guidelines for nutrition.
Food Nutr (Roma). 1984;10(2):36-42.
8
Defined, in-home, prenatal nutrition intervention for low-income women.为低收入女性提供的定制化居家产前营养干预措施。
J Am Diet Assoc. 1999 Sep;99(9):1058-62; quiz 1063-4, 1175. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(99)00251-5.
9
How to make nutrition education more meaningful through facilitated group discussions.如何通过组织小组讨论使营养教育更有意义。
J Am Diet Assoc. 1999 Jan;99(1):72-6. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(99)00019-X.
10
The obesity crisis: don't blame it on the pyramid.肥胖危机:别怪金字塔模型。
J Am Diet Assoc. 2004 Jul;104(7):1141-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2004.04.026.

引用本文的文献

1
Multiple perspectives on nutrition education needs of low-income Hispanics.关于低收入西班牙裔人群营养教育需求的多种观点
J Community Health. 1998 Aug;23(4):301-16. doi: 10.1023/a:1018775522429.