Abebe F, Bjune G
University of Oslo, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of General Practice and Community Medicine, Section for International Health, Oslo, Norway.
Clin Exp Immunol. 2009 Aug;157(2):235-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2009.03967.x.
Tuberculosis (TB) caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) is one of the most important infectious diseases globally. Immune effector mechanisms that lead to protection or development of clinical disease are not fully known. It is generally accepted that cell-mediated immunity (CMI) plays a pivotal role in controlling Mtb infection, whereas antibody responses are believed to have no protective role. This generalization is based mainly on early classical experiments that lacked standard protocols, and the T helper type 1 (Th1)/Th2 paradigm. According to the Th1/Th2 paradigm Th1 cells protect the host from intracellular pathogens, whereas Th2 cells protect form extracellular pathogens. During the last two decades, the Th1/Th2 paradigm has dominated not only our understanding of immunity to infectious pathogens but also our approach to vaccine design. However, the last few years have seen major discrepancies in this model. Convincing evidence for the protective role of antibodies against several intracellular pathogens has been established. Studies of B cell-deficient mice, severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) mice, passive immunization using monoclonal (mAb) and polyclonal antibodies and immune responses against specific mycobacterial antigens in experimental animals reveal that, in addition to a significant immunomodulatory effect on CMI, antibodies play an essential protective role against mycobacterial infections. In this review, our current understanding of the essential role of antibodies during Mtb infections, limitations of the Th1/Th2 model and the unfolding interdependence and mutual regulatory relationships between the humoral and CMI will be presented and discussed.
由结核分枝杆菌(Mtb)引起的结核病(TB)是全球最重要的传染病之一。导致临床疾病得到保护或发展的免疫效应机制尚未完全明确。人们普遍认为,细胞介导的免疫(CMI)在控制Mtb感染中起关键作用,而抗体反应被认为没有保护作用。这种普遍看法主要基于早期缺乏标准方案的经典实验以及1型辅助性T细胞(Th1)/2型辅助性T细胞(Th2)范式。根据Th1/Th2范式,Th1细胞保护宿主免受细胞内病原体侵害,而Th2细胞保护宿主免受细胞外病原体侵害。在过去二十年中,Th1/Th2范式不仅主导了我们对感染性病原体免疫的理解,也主导了我们的疫苗设计方法。然而,在过去几年中,该模型出现了重大差异。已经确立了抗体对几种细胞内病原体具有保护作用的令人信服的证据。对B细胞缺陷小鼠、严重联合免疫缺陷(SCID)小鼠的研究,使用单克隆(mAb)和多克隆抗体的被动免疫以及实验动物中针对特定分枝杆菌抗原的免疫反应表明,除了对CMI具有显著的免疫调节作用外,抗体在抗分枝杆菌感染中也发挥着重要的保护作用。在这篇综述中,我们将介绍并讨论目前对抗体在Mtb感染期间的重要作用的理解、Th1/Th2模型的局限性以及体液免疫和CMI之间正在显现的相互依存和相互调节关系。