Suppr超能文献

盐酸灌注对糜烂性食管炎患者食管上皮细胞间隙的影响。

Variation of the intercellular space in the esophageal epithelium in response to hydrochloridric acid infusion in patients with erosive esophagitis.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo/SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2009;64(7):669-74. doi: 10.1590/S1807-59322009000700011.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

The purpose of this study was to compare esophageal infusion with 0.1 N hydrochloric acid (HCl) to esophageal infusion with saline in patients presenting with typical gastroesophageal reflux symptoms and erosive esophagitis.

METHODS

Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was performed on 44 prospective subjects, 29 of whom were included in the study. Eighteen patients presented with normal esophagi (Control Group "C"), nine of whom were infused with HCl and nine with saline. Eleven patients presented with erosive esophagitis (Lesion Group "L"), five of whom were infused with HCl and six with saline. Biopsies of the esophageal mucosa were collected before and after infusions.

RESULTS

No statistically significant difference was found between the two types of infusions in terms of the dilation of the intercellular space of the esophageal epithelium, regardless of the status of the patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Response to HCl infusion cannot be used as a marker for gastroesophageal reflux disease.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较盐酸(HCl)和生理盐水对有典型胃食管反流症状和食管侵蚀性炎症患者的食管内灌注作用。

方法

对 44 名前瞻性受试者进行上消化道内镜检查,其中 29 名符合纳入标准。18 名受试者食管正常(对照组“C”),其中 9 名给予 HCl 灌注,9 名给予生理盐水灌注。11 名受试者有食管侵蚀性炎症(病变组“L”),其中 5 名给予 HCl 灌注,6 名给予生理盐水灌注。灌注前后采集食管黏膜活检标本。

结果

无论患者状态如何,两种灌注方式对食管上皮细胞间隙扩张的作用无统计学差异。

结论

HCl 灌注反应不能作为胃食管反流病的标志物。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbef/2710441/456c244aa9c7/cln64_7p669f1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验