Degenhardt Louisa, Randall Deborah, Hall Wayne, Law Matthew, Butler Tony, Burns Lucy
National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of NSW, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2009 Nov 1;105(1-2):9-15. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.05.021. Epub 2009 Jul 15.
The small size of previous studies of mortality in opioid dependent people has prevented an assessment of the extent to which elevated mortality risks are consistent across time, clinical and/or patient groups. The current study examines reductions in mortality related to treatment in an entire treatment population.
Data from the New South Wales (NSW) Pharmaceutical Drugs of Addiction System, recording every "authority to dispense" methadone or buprenorphine as opioid replacement therapy, 1985-2006, was linked with data from the National Deaths Index, a record of all deaths in Australia. Crude mortality rates and standardized mortality ratios were calculated according to age, sex, calendar year, period in- or out-of-treatment, medication type, previous treatment exposure and cause of death.
Mortality among 42,676 people entering opioid pharmacotherapy was elevated compared to age and sex peers. Drug overdose and trauma were the major contributors. Mortality was higher out of treatment, particularly during the first weeks, and it was elevated during induction onto methadone but not buprenorphine. Mortality during these risky periods changed across time and treatment episodes. Overall, mortality was similarly reduced (compared to out-of-treatment) whether patients were receiving methadone or buprenorphine. It was estimated that the program produced a 29% reduction in mortality across the entire cohort.
Mortality among treatment-seeking opioid-dependent persons is dynamic across time, patient and treatment variables. The comparative reduction in mortality during buprenorphine induction may be offset by the increased risk of longer out-of-treatment time periods. Despite periods of elevated risk, this large-scale provision of pharmacotherapy is estimated to have resulted in significant reductions in mortality.
以往针对阿片类药物依赖者死亡率的研究规模较小,这使得我们无法评估死亡率升高的风险在不同时间、临床和/或患者群体中保持一致的程度。本研究调查了整个治疗人群中与治疗相关的死亡率降低情况。
将新南威尔士州(NSW)成瘾药物系统的数据与澳大利亚国家死亡指数的数据相链接。新南威尔士州成瘾药物系统记录了1985年至2006年期间每一次作为阿片类药物替代疗法的美沙酮或丁丙诺啡“配药授权”情况,国家死亡指数记录了澳大利亚所有死亡情况。根据年龄、性别、日历年份、治疗期间或治疗外时间、药物类型、既往治疗暴露情况和死亡原因计算粗死亡率和标准化死亡率。
与年龄和性别匹配的同龄人相比,42676名接受阿片类药物药物治疗的人的死亡率有所升高。药物过量和创伤是主要原因。治疗外的死亡率更高,尤其是在最初几周,美沙酮诱导期间死亡率升高,但丁丙诺啡诱导期间死亡率未升高。这些高风险时期的死亡率随时间和治疗阶段而变化。总体而言,无论患者接受美沙酮还是丁丙诺啡治疗,死亡率(与治疗外相比)均有类似程度的降低。据估计,该项目使整个队列的死亡率降低了29%。
寻求治疗的阿片类药物依赖者的死亡率随时间、患者和治疗变量而动态变化。丁丙诺啡诱导期间死亡率的相对降低可能会被治疗外时间延长带来的风险增加所抵消。尽管存在风险升高的时期,但据估计,这种大规模的药物治疗显著降低了死亡率。