• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一般人群中慢性和发作性头痛患者的药物使用模式:来自频发头痛流行病学研究的结果。

Patterns of medication use by chronic and episodic headache sufferers in the general population: results from the frequent headache epidemiology study.

机构信息

Department of Preventive Medicine and Biometrics, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA.

出版信息

Cephalalgia. 2010 Mar;30(3):321-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2009.01913.x. Epub 2010 Feb 1.

DOI:10.1111/j.1468-2982.2009.01913.x
PMID:19614708
Abstract

Though symptomatic medication overuse is believed to play a role in progression from episodic headaches (EH) to chronic daily headaches (CDH), population-based data on this topic are limited. Our objective was to describe patterns of medication use among CDH and EH sufferers in a general population sample. We compared medications used to treat headache in CDH cases and EH controls identified from a large population-based computer-assisted telephone interview survey. CDH began within 5 years of the computer-assisted telephone interview. Questions on medication use focused on treatment prior to the onset of CDH for cases and on an equivalent period in the past for controls. We asked about the likelihood of treating, time waiting to treat, number of different medications used, first, second and third most frequently used headache pain medication, and total treatment days. Questions were also asked about the use of medication for non-headache pain. Current treatment patterns and past treatment patterns were assessed. Likelihood of use of specific medications was compared between CDH cases and EH controls after adjusting for age, sex, primary headache type and number of medications taken to treat pain. Our sample consists of 206 CDH cases and 507 EH controls. CDH subjects were more likely than EH controls to use over-the-counter/caffeine combination products, triptans, opioid compounds and 'other' prescription pain medications. Use of aspirin was protective. After adjustment, aspirin and ibuprofen were (negatively) associated with CDH [OR = 0.5 (0.3-0.9), OR = 0.7 (0.5-1.0)] and opioids remained positively associated with CDH [OR = 2.3 (1.3-3.9)]. For past use, CDH was positively associated with over-the-counter/caffeine combination products and opioid compounds and was negatively associated with use of aspirin. Only ibuprofen remained (negatively) associated with CDH after adjustment [OR = 0.6 (0.4-0.9)]. After adjusting for demographic factors, primary headache type and number of medications taken, CDH sufferers are more likely to use opioid-combination analgesics, and less likely to use aspirin or ibuprofen, than EH sufferers.

摘要

尽管人们认为症状性药物滥用在从发作性头痛(EH)向慢性每日头痛(CDH)的进展中起作用,但关于这一主题的基于人群的数据有限。我们的目的是描述一般人群样本中 CDH 和 EH 患者的药物使用模式。我们比较了从一项大型基于人群的计算机辅助电话访谈调查中确定的 CDH 病例和 EH 对照者使用的治疗头痛的药物。CDH 在计算机辅助电话访谈后 5 年内开始。关于药物使用的问题侧重于病例的 CDH 发作前和对照者过去的等效时期。我们询问了治疗的可能性、治疗等待时间、使用的不同药物数量、首选的第二和第三种头痛止痛药,以及总治疗天数。还询问了用于非头痛疼痛的药物使用情况。评估了当前的治疗模式和过去的治疗模式。在调整年龄、性别、主要头痛类型和用于治疗疼痛的药物数量后,比较了 CDH 病例和 EH 对照者使用特定药物的可能性。我们的样本包括 206 例 CDH 病例和 507 例 EH 对照者。与 EH 对照者相比,CDH 患者更有可能使用非处方/咖啡因组合产品、曲坦类药物、阿片类化合物和“其他”处方止痛药。使用阿司匹林具有保护作用。调整后,阿司匹林和布洛芬与 CDH 呈负相关[OR=0.5(0.3-0.9),OR=0.7(0.5-1.0)],而阿片类药物与 CDH 呈正相关[OR=2.3(1.3-3.9)]。对于过去的使用,CDH 与非处方/咖啡因组合产品和阿片类化合物呈正相关,与阿司匹林的使用呈负相关。调整后,只有布洛芬仍与 CDH 呈负相关[OR=0.6(0.4-0.9)]。在调整人口因素、主要头痛类型和使用的药物数量后,CDH 患者比 EH 患者更有可能使用阿片类复合镇痛药,而不太可能使用阿司匹林或布洛芬。

相似文献

1
Patterns of medication use by chronic and episodic headache sufferers in the general population: results from the frequent headache epidemiology study.一般人群中慢性和发作性头痛患者的药物使用模式:来自频发头痛流行病学研究的结果。
Cephalalgia. 2010 Mar;30(3):321-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2009.01913.x. Epub 2010 Feb 1.
2
Transformed migraine and medication overuse in a tertiary headache centre--clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes.三级头痛中心的转化型偏头痛与药物过度使用——临床特征及治疗结果
Cephalalgia. 2004 Jun;24(6):483-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2004.00691.x.
3
Chronic daily headache in adolescents: prevalence, impact, and medication overuse.青少年慢性每日头痛:患病率、影响及药物过度使用
Neurology. 2006 Jan 24;66(2):193-7. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000183555.54305.fd.
4
Head or neck injury increases the risk of chronic daily headache: a population-based study.头部或颈部损伤会增加慢性每日头痛的风险:一项基于人群的研究。
Neurology. 2007 Sep 11;69(11):1169-77. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000276985.07981.0a.
5
A 13-year long-term outcome study of elderly with chronic daily headache.一项针对慢性每日头痛老年人的13年长期结局研究。
Cephalalgia. 2008 Oct;28(10):1017-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2008.01637.x. Epub 2008 Jul 8.
6
Major life changes before and after the onset of chronic daily headache: a population-based study.慢性每日头痛发作前后的重大生活变化:一项基于人群的研究。
Cephalalgia. 2008 Aug;28(8):868-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2008.01634.x. Epub 2008 Jun 28.
7
Acute migraine treatment: patterns of use and satisfaction in a clinical population.急性偏头痛治疗:临床人群中的使用模式与满意度
Headache. 2006 May;46(5):773-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2006.00437.x.
8
Chronic daily headache in a primary care population: prevalence and headache impact test scores.基层医疗人群中的慢性每日头痛:患病率及头痛影响测试分数
Headache. 2007 Jan;47(1):7-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2007.00647.x.
9
Prevalence and associated factors for episodic and chronic daily headache in the Colombian population.哥伦比亚人群发作性和慢性每日头痛的患病率及相关因素
Cephalalgia. 2008 Mar;28(3):216-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2007.01499.x.
10
Outcomes and predictors of chronic daily headache in adolescents: a 2-year longitudinal study.青少年慢性每日头痛的结局与预测因素:一项为期2年的纵向研究。
Neurology. 2007 Feb 20;68(8):591-6. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000252800.82704.62. Epub 2006 Dec 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Association Between Spinal Manipulation, Butalbital Prescription, and Medication Overuse Headache in Adults With Tension-Type Headache: Retrospective Cohort Study.脊柱推拿、布他比妥处方与紧张型头痛成人药物过量使用性头痛之间的关联:一项回顾性队列研究
Health Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 29;7(12):e70218. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70218. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Breaking the cycle: unraveling the diagnostic, pathophysiological and treatment challenges of refractory migraine.打破循环:揭示难治性偏头痛的诊断、病理生理及治疗挑战
Front Neurol. 2023 Sep 27;14:1263535. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1263535. eCollection 2023.
3
The Prevalence and Level of Awareness of Medication Overuse Headache in Qassim Province, Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.
沙特阿拉伯卡西姆省药物过度使用性头痛的患病率及知晓水平:一项横断面研究
Cureus. 2022 Aug 17;14(8):e28101. doi: 10.7759/cureus.28101. eCollection 2022 Aug.
4
Advocacy for Migraine Relief: Strategic Planning to Eliminate the Burden.倡导偏头痛缓解:消除负担的战略规划。
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2022 Aug;26(8):567-574. doi: 10.1007/s11916-022-01059-1. Epub 2022 Jun 18.
5
Using a Chatbot to Study Medication Overuse Among Patients Suffering From Headaches.使用聊天机器人研究头痛患者的药物过度使用情况。
Front Digit Health. 2022 Mar 17;4:801782. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.801782. eCollection 2022.
6
OnabotulinumtoxinA alters inflammatory gene expression and immune cells in chronic headache patients.肉毒毒素 A 改变慢性头痛患者的炎症基因表达和免疫细胞。
Brain. 2022 Jul 29;145(7):2436-2449. doi: 10.1093/brain/awab461.
7
Intracranial pressure directly predicts headache morbidity in idiopathic intracranial hypertension.颅内压直接预测特发性颅内高压头痛的发病率。
J Headache Pain. 2021 Oct 7;22(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s10194-021-01321-8.
8
Candidate Genes and Proteomic Biomarkers of Serum and Urine in Medication-Overuse Headache.药物过度使用性头痛患者血清和尿液中的候选基因和蛋白质生物标志物
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Aug 21;22(16):9024. doi: 10.3390/ijms22169024.
9
Sudden Caffeine Withdrawal Triggers Migraine-A Randomized Controlled Trial.突然停用咖啡因引发偏头痛——一项随机对照试验
Front Neurol. 2020 Sep 10;11:1002. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.01002. eCollection 2020.
10
Chinese Herbal Formula Xuefu Zhuyu for Tension-Type Headache with -Stagnation and Blood-Stasis Pattern (CheruXTH): Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.治疗气滞血瘀型紧张性头痛的中药方剂血府逐瘀汤(CheruXTH):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2020 Sep 11;2020:5653169. doi: 10.1155/2020/5653169. eCollection 2020.