Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Hospital Avenue, Nedlands, Perth, Western Australia 6009, Australia.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Mar 15;76(4):1066-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.03.052. Epub 2009 Jul 18.
We examined catheter displacement in patients treated with fractionated high-dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy boost for prostate cancer and the impact this had on tumor control probability (TCP). These data were used to make conclusions on an acceptable amount of displacement.
The last 20 patients treated with HDR brachytherapy boost for prostate cancer at our center in 2007 were replanned using simulated interstitial catheter displacements of 3, 6, 9, and 12 mm with originally planned dwell times. The computer-modeled dose-volume histograms for the clinical target volumes were exported and used to calculate the TCP of plans with displaced needles relative to the original plan. Actual catheter displacements were also measured before and after manual adjustment in all patients treated in 2007.
In the 20 patients who were replanned for caudal catheter displacements of 3, 6, 9, and 12 mm, the median relative TCP was 0.998, 0.964, 0.797, and 0.265, respectively (p < 0.01 when all medians were compared). All patients replanned with a 3-mm displacement, compared with only 75% with a 6-mm displacement, had a relative TCP greater than 0.950. In the 91 patients treated in 2007, before adjustment, 82.3% of fractions had a displacement greater than 3 mm compared with 12.2% of fractions after adjustment.
Catheter displacement in HDR brachytherapy significantly compromises the TCP. The tolerance for these movements should be small (< or =3 mm). Correcting these displacements to within acceptable limits is feasible.
我们研究了接受分次高剂量率(HDR)近距离治疗前列腺癌的患者中导管移位的情况,以及这种移位对肿瘤控制概率(TCP)的影响。这些数据被用于得出可接受的移位量的结论。
2007 年,我们中心对最后 20 例接受 HDR 近距离治疗前列腺癌的患者进行了重新规划,模拟了间质导管的 3、6、9 和 12mm 的位移,并使用原始驻留时间进行了计划。将临床靶体积的计算机模型剂量-体积直方图导出,并用于计算相对于原始计划的移位针计划的 TCP。在 2007 年接受治疗的所有患者中,在手动调整前后都测量了实际的导管移位。
在 20 例接受尾侧导管 3、6、9 和 12mm 位移的患者中,中位相对 TCP 分别为 0.998、0.964、0.797 和 0.265(所有中位数比较时 p<0.01)。与 6mm 位移相比,所有计划接受 3mm 位移的患者,相对 TCP 均大于 0.950。在 2007 年接受治疗的 91 例患者中,调整前,82.3%的剂量有大于 3mm 的位移,调整后为 12.2%。
HDR 近距离治疗中的导管移位显著降低了 TCP。对于这些运动的容忍度应该很小(<=3mm)。将这些移位纠正到可接受的范围内是可行的。