Suppr超能文献

全身PET/CT、专用高分辨率头颈PET/CT及增强CT在临床M0期头颈部鳞状细胞癌术前分期中的比较

Comparison of whole-body PET/CT, dedicated high-resolution head and neck PET/CT, and contrast-enhanced CT in preoperative staging of clinically M0 squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

作者信息

Rodrigues Rosana S, Bozza Fernando A, Christian Paul E, Hoffman John M, Butterfield Regan I, Christensen Carl R, Heilbrun Marta, Wiggins Richard H, Hunt Jason P, Bentz Brandon G, Hitchcock Ying J, Morton Kathryn A

机构信息

Biomaging-INBEB and Department of Radiology, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil..

出版信息

J Nucl Med. 2009 Aug;50(8):1205-13. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.109.062075. Epub 2009 Jul 17.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

The purpose of this study was to compare optimized whole-body (WB) and dedicated high-resolution contrast-enhanced PET/CT protocols and contrast enhanced CT in the preoperative staging of primary squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

METHODS

A total of 44 patients with clinically M0 squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck underwent primary tumor resection and neck dissection within 6 wk of diagnostic imaging. Imaging consisted of a standard WB PET/CT protocol without intravenous contrast enhancement, followed by a high-resolution dedicated head and neck (HN) PET/CT protocol, which included diagnostic-quality contrast-enhanced CT (CECT). Imaging results were compared with histopathology. A 5-point scale was used to designate primary tumor localization and the presence of lymph node metastasis on a per-patient and per-level basis. For cervical nodes, receiver-operating-characteristic curves were generated to determine the differences in performance between the WB and HN PET/CT protocols and CECT. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy were calculated for primary tumor and cervical nodes.

RESULTS

No statistical difference was observed between WB and HN PET/CT protocols, both of which significantly outperformed CECT, in the evaluation of the primary tumor. The performance of the HN PET/CT protocol was superior to that of the WB PET/CT in the detection of cervical node metastases, achieving statistical significance on a per-level basis and approaching significance on a per-patient basis, with the greatest advantage in the detection of small positive lymph nodes (<15 mm). No significant difference was observed between the WB PET/CT protocol and CECT in nodal staging, either on a per-patient or on a per-level basis.

CONCLUSION

The primary advantage of the dedicated HN PET/CT protocol over the WB protocol or CECT in the staging of head and neck cancer is in the detection of small lymph node metastases.

摘要

未标注

本研究的目的是比较优化的全身(WB)和专用高分辨率对比增强PET/CT方案以及对比增强CT在头颈部原发性鳞状细胞癌术前分期中的应用。

方法

共有44例临床诊断为M0期的头颈部鳞状细胞癌患者在诊断性成像后6周内接受了原发性肿瘤切除和颈淋巴结清扫术。成像包括无静脉对比增强的标准WB PET/CT方案,随后是高分辨率专用头颈部(HN)PET/CT方案,其中包括诊断级对比增强CT(CECT)。将成像结果与组织病理学进行比较。采用5分制在患者个体和每一层面指定原发性肿瘤的定位以及淋巴结转移情况。对于颈部淋巴结,生成受试者操作特征曲线以确定WB和HN PET/CT方案与CECT之间在性能上的差异。计算原发性肿瘤和颈部淋巴结的敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值以及准确性。

结果

在原发性肿瘤评估中,WB和HN PET/CT方案之间未观察到统计学差异,二者均显著优于CECT。在检测颈部淋巴结转移方面,HN PET/CT方案的性能优于WB PET/CT方案,在每一层面具有统计学意义,在患者个体层面接近统计学意义,在检测小的阳性淋巴结(<15 mm)方面优势最大。在淋巴结分期方面,无论是在患者个体层面还是每一层面,WB PET/CT方案与CECT之间均未观察到显著差异。

结论

在头颈部癌症分期中,专用HN PET/CT方案相对于WB方案或CECT的主要优势在于检测小的淋巴结转移。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验