Huang Bing S, Ahmad Monir, Tan Junhui, Leenen Frans H H
Hypertension Unit, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1Y 4W7.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2009 Sep;297(3):H968-75. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00317.2009. Epub 2009 Jul 17.
In rats, both central and systemic ANG II type 1 (AT(1)) receptor blockade attenuate sympathetic hyperactivity, but central blockade more effectively attenuates left ventricular (LV) dysfunction post-myocardial infarction (MI). In protocol I, we examined whether functional effects on cardiac load may play a role and different cardiac effects disappear after withdrawal of the blockade. Wistar rats were infused for 4 wk post-MI intracerebroventricularly (1 mg.kg(-1).day(-1)) or injected subcutaneously daily (100 mg x kg(-1) x day(-1)) with losartan. LV dimensions and function were assessed at 4 wk and at 6 wk post-MI, i.e., 2 wk after discontinuing treatments. At 4 and 6 wk post-MI, LV dimensions were increased and ejection fraction was decreased. Intracerebroventricular but not subcutaneous losartan significantly improved these parameters. At 6 wk, LV peak systolic pressure (LVPSP) and maximal or minimal first derivative of change in pressure over time (dP/dt(max/min)) were decreased and LV end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) was increased. All four indexes were improved by previous intracerebroventricular losartan, whereas subcutaneous losartan improved LVEDP only. In protocol II, we evaluated effects of oral instead of subcutaneous administration of losartan for 4 wk post-MI. Losartan ( approximately 200 mg x kg(-1) x day(-1)) either via drinking water or by gavage similarly decreased AT(1) receptor binding densities in brain nuclei and improved LVEDP but further decreased LVPSP and dP/dt(max). These results indicate that effects on cardiac load by peripheral AT(1) receptor blockade or the pharmacokinetic profile of subcutaneous versus oral dosing do not contribute to the different cardiac effects of central versus systemic AT(1) receptor blockade post-MI.
在大鼠中,中枢和全身的血管紧张素II 1型(AT(1))受体阻断均可减轻交感神经过度活动,但中枢阻断能更有效地减轻心肌梗死(MI)后的左心室(LV)功能障碍。在方案I中,我们研究了对心脏负荷的功能影响是否起作用,以及阻断撤除后不同的心脏效应是否消失。将Wistar大鼠在MI后4周经脑室内注射(1 mg·kg⁻¹·天⁻¹)或每日皮下注射(100 mg·kg⁻¹·天⁻¹)氯沙坦。在MI后4周和6周,即停止治疗2周后,评估LV尺寸和功能。在MI后4周和6周,LV尺寸增加,射血分数降低。脑室内而非皮下注射氯沙坦可显著改善这些参数。在6周时,LV收缩压峰值(LVPSP)以及压力随时间变化的最大或最小一阶导数(dP/dt(max/min))降低,LV舒张末期压力(LVEDP)升高。先前脑室内注射氯沙坦可改善所有这四项指标,而皮下注射氯沙坦仅改善LVEDP。在方案II中,我们评估了MI后4周口服而非皮下给予氯沙坦的效果。通过饮水或灌胃给予氯沙坦(约200 mg·kg⁻¹·天⁻¹)同样降低了脑核中AT(1)受体结合密度,并改善了LVEDP,但进一步降低了LVPSP和dP/dt(max)。这些结果表明,外周AT(1)受体阻断对心脏负荷的影响或皮下与口服给药的药代动力学特征并非MI后中枢与全身AT(1)受体阻断产生不同心脏效应的原因。