Kelly E J, Van Vactor J C
Department of Special Education, University of Nevada, Las Vegas 89154.
Psychol Rep. 1991 Aug;69(1):303-11. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1991.69.1.303.
Five instruments, the Differential Test of Conduct and Emotional Problems, Louisville Behavior Checklist, Personality Inventory for Children, 16 PF Test, and Tennessee Self-concept Scale, were given to differentiate between 50 conduct problem and 48 emotionally disturbed students assigned in public school to secondary level classes for the severely emotionally handicapped. Discriminant analysis of each test's rate of classification germane to both a pre-assessment categorization as conduct problem vs emotionally disturbed and a post-assessment classification as no problem vs conduct problem vs emotionally disturbed vs combined problem is presented. The analysis indicated that the Differential Test of Conduct and Emotional Problems, Louisville Behavior Checklist, and Personality Inventory for Children can, with variable effectiveness, significantly classify adolescents into groups using such pre- and post-assessment information.
使用了五种工具,即行为与情绪问题差异测试、路易斯维尔行为清单、儿童个性量表、16种人格因素测验和田纳西自我概念量表,以区分50名行为问题学生和48名情绪障碍学生,这些学生被公立学校分配到重度情绪障碍的中学班级。本文呈现了对每项测试的分类率进行判别分析的结果,该分类率与评估前行为问题与情绪障碍的分类以及评估后无问题、行为问题、情绪障碍和综合问题的分类相关。分析表明,行为与情绪问题差异测试、路易斯维尔行为清单和儿童个性量表能够以不同程度的有效性,利用此类评估前和评估后的信息将青少年显著地分为不同组。