• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Impact of financial incentives for prenatal care on birth outcomes and spending.产前护理经济激励措施对出生结局和支出的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2009 Oct;44(5 Pt 1):1465-79. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.00996.x. Epub 2009 Jul 13.
2
Birth Outcomes of Women Using a Midwife versus Women Using a Physician for Prenatal Care.产妇使用助产士和使用医师进行产前护理的分娩结果比较。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2018 Jul;63(4):399-409. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12750. Epub 2018 Jun 26.
3
A comparison of capitated and fee-for-service Medicaid reimbursement methods on pregnancy outcomes.按人头付费和按服务收费的医疗补助偿还方式对妊娠结局的比较。
Health Serv Res. 1998 Apr;33(1):55-73.
4
Impact of augmented prenatal care on birth outcomes of Medicaid recipients in New York City.强化产前护理对纽约市医疗补助受助者分娩结局的影响。
J Health Econ. 1999 Jan;18(1):31-67. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(98)00027-7.
5
Birth outcomes associated with receipt of group prenatal care among low-income Hispanic women.与低收入西班牙裔妇女接受群体产前护理相关的生育结果。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2012 Sep-Oct;57(5):476-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-2011.2012.00184.x.
6
Association of the Affordable Care Act Dependent Coverage Provision With Prenatal Care Use and Birth Outcomes.《平价医疗法案》受抚养人保险条款与产前护理利用及出生结局的关联
JAMA. 2018 Feb 13;319(6):579-587. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.0030.
7
Outcomes of Latina women in CenteringPregnancy group prenatal care compared with individual prenatal care.拉美裔女性在集中妊娠组产前护理中的结局与个体产前护理的比较。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2013 Jul-Aug;58(4):396-403. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12000. Epub 2013 Jul 15.
8
Prediction by maternal risk factors of neonatal intensive care admissions: evaluation of >59,000 women in national managed care programs.通过孕产妇风险因素预测新生儿重症监护病房入院情况:对国家管理式医疗计划中超过59000名女性的评估。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Oct;181(4):835-42. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70310-8.
9
Improved birth outcomes associated with enhanced Medicaid prenatal care in drug-using women infected with the human immunodeficiency virus.在感染人类免疫缺陷病毒的吸毒女性中,与强化医疗补助产前护理相关的更好的分娩结局。
Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Jun;91(6):885-91. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(98)00092-1.
10
Preventing low birth weight in Illinois: outcomes of the family case management program.预防伊利诺伊州的低出生体重:家庭病例管理项目的成果
Matern Child Health J. 2006 Nov;10(6):481-8. doi: 10.1007/s10995-006-0133-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Association between infant mortality and parental educational level: An analysis of data from Vital Statistics and Census in Japan.婴儿死亡率与父母受教育程度的关系:来自日本人口动态统计和普查数据的分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 14;18(6):e0286530. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286530. eCollection 2023.
2
The impact of income-support interventions on life course risk factors and health outcomes during childhood: a systematic review in high income countries.收入支持干预对高收入国家儿童期生命历程风险因素和健康结果的影响:系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Apr 22;23(1):744. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15595-x.
3
The Effect of Financial Incentives on Adherence to Glucose Self-Monitoring during Pregnancy among Patients with Insulin-Requiring Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.财政激励对需要胰岛素治疗的糖尿病患者妊娠期间葡萄糖自我监测依从性的影响:一项随机临床试验。
Am J Perinatol. 2024 May;41(S 01):e259-e266. doi: 10.1055/a-1889-7765. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
4
Increasing Prenatal Care Compliance in At-Risk Black Women: Findings from a RCT of Patient Navigation and Behavioral Incentives.提高高危黑人女性的产前护理依从性:患者导航与行为激励随机对照试验的结果
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2022 Apr;9(2):630-640. doi: 10.1007/s40615-021-00995-9. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
5
Associations between introduction and withdrawal of a financial incentive and timing of attendance for antenatal care and incidence of small for gestational age: natural experimental evaluation using interrupted time series methods.经济激励措施的引入与取消与产前检查就诊时间及小于胎龄儿发生率之间的关联:采用中断时间序列方法的自然实验评估
BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 31;8(1):e017697. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017697.
6
Introducing Value-Based Purchasing into TRICARE Reform.将基于价值的采购引入军事医疗保健改革。
Rand Health Q. 2017 Jan 13;6(2):9. eCollection 2017 Jan.
7
Characterization and effectiveness of pay-for-performance in ophthalmology: a systematic review.眼科绩效薪酬的特征与效果:一项系统评价
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jun 5;17(1):385. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2333-x.
8
Measuring Success in Health Care Value-Based Purchasing Programs: Findings from an Environmental Scan, Literature Review, and Expert Panel Discussions.衡量医疗保健价值导向型采购计划的成效:环境扫描、文献综述及专家小组讨论的结果
Rand Health Q. 2014 Dec 30;4(3):9.
9
Predictions of the affordable care act's impact on neonatal practice.《平价医疗法案》对新生儿医疗实践影响的预测
J Perinatol. 2016 Aug;36(8):586-92. doi: 10.1038/jp.2016.93.
10
Incentives for increasing prenatal care use by women in order to improve maternal and neonatal outcomes.为改善孕产妇和新生儿结局而激励女性增加产前检查的使用。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 15;2015(12):CD009916. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009916.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Quality monitoring and management in commercial health plans.商业健康保险计划中的质量监测与管理
Am J Manag Care. 2008 Jun;14(6):377-86.
2
Cost of hospitalization for preterm and low birth weight infants in the United States.美国早产和低体重婴儿的住院费用。
Pediatrics. 2007 Jul;120(1):e1-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-2386.
3
Pay for performance in commercial HMOs.商业健康维护组织中的绩效薪酬。
N Engl J Med. 2006 Nov 2;355(18):1895-902. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa063682.
4
Is prenatal care really ineffective? Or, is the 'devil' in the distribution?产前护理真的无效吗?还是说,“问题”出在其分配上?
J Health Econ. 2005 May;24(3):489-513. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2004.09.012.
5
Too much ado about two-part models and transformation? Comparing methods of modeling Medicare expenditures.对两部分模型和转换大惊小怪?比较医疗保险支出的建模方法。
J Health Econ. 2004 May;23(3):525-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2003.10.005.
6
Assessing the role and effectiveness of prenatal care: history, challenges, and directions for future research.评估产前护理的作用和效果:历史、挑战及未来研究方向。
Public Health Rep. 2001 Jul-Aug;116(4):306-16. doi: 10.1093/phr/116.4.306.
7
Health insurance, the quantity and quality of prenatal care, and infant health.医疗保险、产前护理的数量和质量以及婴儿健康。
Inquiry. 1999 Summer;36(2):162-75.
8
Prenatal care incentives in Europe. Study Group on Barriers and Incentives to Prenatal Care in Europe.欧洲的产前护理激励措施。欧洲产前护理障碍与激励措施研究小组。
J Public Health Policy. 1998;19(3):331-49.
9
The association between adequacy of prenatal care utilization and subsequent pediatric care utilization in the United States.美国产前护理利用的充分性与后续儿科护理利用之间的关联。
Pediatrics. 1998 Jul;102(1 Pt 1):25-30. doi: 10.1542/peds.102.1.25.
10
Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data.用于行政数据的共病测量方法。
Med Care. 1998 Jan;36(1):8-27. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199801000-00004.

产前护理经济激励措施对出生结局和支出的影响。

Impact of financial incentives for prenatal care on birth outcomes and spending.

作者信息

Rosenthal Meredith B, Li Zhonghe, Robertson Audra D, Milstein Arnold

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2009 Oct;44(5 Pt 1):1465-79. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.00996.x. Epub 2009 Jul 13.

DOI:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.00996.x
PMID:19619248
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2754543/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of offering US$100 each to patients and their obstetricians or midwives for timely and comprehensive prenatal care on low birth weight, neonatal intensive care admissions, and total pediatric health care spending in the first year of life.

DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: Claims and enrollment profiles of the predominantly low-income and Hispanic participants of a union-sponsored, health insurance plan from 1998 to 2001.

STUDY DESIGN

Panel data analysis of outcomes and spending for participants and nonparticipants using instrumental variables to account for selection bias. DATA COLLECTION/ABSTRACTION METHODS: Data provided were analyzed using t-tests and chi-squared tests to compare maternal characteristics and birth outcomes for incentive program participants and nonparticipants, with and without instrumental variables to address selection bias. Adjusted variables were analyzed using logistic regression models.

PRINCIPLE FINDINGS

Participation in the incentive program was significantly associated with lower odds of neonatal intensive care unit admission (0.45; 95 percent CI, 0.23-0.88) and spending in the first year of life (estimated elasticity of -0.07; 95 percent CI, -0.12 to -0.01), but not low birth weight (0.53; 95 percent CI, 0.23-1.18).

CONCLUSION

The use of patient and physician incentives may be an effective mechanism for improving use of recommended prenatal care and associated outcomes, particularly among low-income women.

摘要

目的

评估向患者及其产科医生或助产士每人提供100美元以鼓励其进行及时、全面的产前护理,对低出生体重、新生儿重症监护病房收治情况以及出生后第一年的儿科医疗总支出的影响。

数据来源/研究背景:1998年至2001年由工会赞助的医疗保险计划中,主要为低收入和西班牙裔参与者的理赔和参保情况。

研究设计

使用工具变量对参与者和非参与者的结果及支出进行面板数据分析,以解决选择偏倚问题。数据收集/提取方法:对提供的数据进行t检验和卡方检验,以比较激励计划参与者和非参与者的孕产妇特征及分娩结果,有无工具变量以解决选择偏倚。对调整后的变量使用逻辑回归模型进行分析。

主要发现

参与激励计划与新生儿重症监护病房收治几率降低(0.45;95%可信区间,0.23 - 0.88)以及出生后第一年的支出降低(估计弹性为 -0.07;95%可信区间,-0.12至 -0.01)显著相关,但与低出生体重无关(0.53;95%可信区间,0.23 - 1.18)。

结论

使用患者和医生激励措施可能是改善推荐产前护理利用情况及相关结果的有效机制,尤其是在低收入女性中。