Suppr超能文献

硫喷妥钠与丙泊酚用于短时麻醉的比较研究

[Comparative study between thiopental and propofol in short-duration anesthesia].

作者信息

Monedero Rodríguez P, Panadero Sánchez A, García Pedrajas F, Carrera Hueso J, Catalá Bauset J C, Arroyo Carreras J L

机构信息

Departamento de Anestesiología y Reanimación, Clínica Universitaria, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Navarra.

出版信息

Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 1991 May-Jun;38(3):153-5.

PMID:1961958
Abstract

In a randomized study, 80 healthy unpremedicated female patients were included. For short gynaecological procedures (curettage) they were anaesthetized with either propofol 2 mg/kg (n = 40) or thiopentone 5 mg/kg (n = 40) in combination with nitrous oxide/oxygen (1/1). Supplementary doses of propofol (25 mg) or thiopentone (50 mg) were given when necessary during the procedure. Propofol caused a significant fall in arterial blood pressure (greater than thiopentone in diastolic pressure) and a decrease in heart rate (thiopentone did not change heart rate). Discomfort on injection was similar in both groups. Recovery times were shorter in propofol group: Patients opened their eyes at 1.3 minutes, were awake at 2.2 minutes and could seat with no help at 5.2 minutes. In the thiopentone group, there was a greater incidence of nausea. Propofol was associated with euphoria, "clear-headedness" and pleasant dreams more than thiopentone. We conclude that propofol is a good alternative to thiopentone in short operative procedures.

摘要

在一项随机研究中,纳入了80名未用药的健康女性患者。对于短小妇科手术(刮宫术),她们分别接受2mg/kg丙泊酚(n = 40)或5mg/kg硫喷妥钠(n = 40)联合氧化亚氮/氧气(1/1)麻醉。手术过程中必要时给予补充剂量的丙泊酚(25mg)或硫喷妥钠(50mg)。丙泊酚导致动脉血压显著下降(舒张压下降幅度大于硫喷妥钠)且心率降低(硫喷妥钠未改变心率)。两组注射时的不适感相似。丙泊酚组的恢复时间更短:患者在1.3分钟时睁眼,2.2分钟时清醒,5.2分钟时无需帮助即可坐起。硫喷妥钠组恶心发生率更高。与硫喷妥钠相比,丙泊酚与欣快感、“头脑清醒”和愉快梦境的关联更多。我们得出结论,在短小手术中,丙泊酚是硫喷妥钠的良好替代药物。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验