Suppr超能文献

丙泊酚与硫喷妥钠麻醉的比较(特别提及苏醒特征)

Comparison of propofol and thiopentone anaesthesia (with special reference to recovery characteristics).

作者信息

Weightman W M, Zacharias M

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia, Southland Hospital, Invercargill, New Zealand.

出版信息

Anaesth Intensive Care. 1987 Nov;15(4):389-93. doi: 10.1177/0310057X8701500406.

Abstract

Thiopentone and propofol were used for the induction and maintenance of anaesthesia in unpremedicated patients undergoing minor gynaecological procedures. There were no significant differences in the induction and maintenance characteristics except for a high incidence of pain on injection and a greater fall in the mean systolic blood pressure associated with propofol in comparison with thiopentone. Propofol was associated with a quicker early recovery as well as a faster psychomotor recovery, as tested by a peg-board. However, complete psychomotor recovery was not achieved for up to three hours in some patients receiving propofol and so caution is advised regarding the early street fitness of patients receiving repeated doses of the drug for day case surgery.

摘要

硫喷妥钠和丙泊酚用于未使用术前药、接受小型妇科手术患者的麻醉诱导和维持。除了注射时疼痛发生率高以及与硫喷妥钠相比,丙泊酚组平均收缩压下降幅度更大外,诱导和维持特征方面无显著差异。丙泊酚组早期恢复更快,通过钉板测试的精神运动恢复也更快。然而,一些接受丙泊酚的患者在长达三小时内未实现完全的精神运动恢复,因此对于日间手术中接受重复剂量该药物的患者的早期出院适宜性需谨慎对待。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验