Wang Diane D, Zhang Shuzhong, Zhao Hong, Men Angela Y, Parivar Kourosh
Pfizer Oncology, San Diego, California, USA.
J Clin Pharmacol. 2009 Sep;49(9):1012-24. doi: 10.1177/0091270009337512. Epub 2009 Jul 20.
Although without clear scientific rationale, body size-based dosing is often used for administering monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). This simulation study compared the performance of body size-based and fixed dosing in reducing pharmacokinetic (PK) and/or pharmacodynamic (PD) variability in adults for 12 mAbs with published population PK and/or PD models. At the population level, 95th percentile intervals of concentration-time profiles, distribution, and variability of exposure for 1000 subjects after both dosing approaches were examined. At the individual level, the difference between the exposures of patients with extreme body sizes from the typical exposure following both approaches was compared. The results show that the 2 dosing approaches perform similarly across the mAbs investigated with fixed dosing being better for some mAbs and body size-based dosing being better for the others. Based on this finding, we recommend using fixed dosing in first-in-human (FIH) adult studies because it offers other advantages. When sufficient data become available, a full assessment of body size effect on PK/PD should be conducted to determine the optimal dosing approach for phase 3 trials. Other factors that may affect the selection of dosing approach were also discussed. Dosing approach for mAbs in the pediatric population is out of the scope of this study.
尽管缺乏明确的科学依据,但基于体重的给药方法常用于单克隆抗体(mAb)的给药。本模拟研究比较了基于体重给药和固定剂量给药在降低12种已发表群体药代动力学(PK)和/或药效学(PD)模型的成人mAb药代动力学和/或药效学变异性方面的表现。在群体水平上,研究了两种给药方法后1000名受试者的浓度-时间曲线、分布和暴露变异性的第95百分位数区间。在个体水平上,比较了两种方法下极端体重患者的暴露量与典型暴露量之间的差异。结果表明,在所研究的mAb中,两种给药方法的表现相似,固定剂量给药对某些mAb更好,基于体重的给药对其他mAb更好。基于这一发现,我们建议在成人首次人体(FIH)研究中使用固定剂量给药,因为它具有其他优势。当有足够的数据时,应全面评估体重对PK/PD的影响,以确定3期试验的最佳给药方法。还讨论了可能影响给药方法选择的其他因素。儿科人群中mAb的给药方法不在本研究范围内。