• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹膜肿瘤的扩散加权磁共振成像:与传统磁共振成像及手术和组织病理学结果的比较——一项可行性研究

Diffusion-weighted MRI of peritoneal tumors: comparison with conventional MRI and surgical and histopathologic findings--a feasibility study.

作者信息

Low Russell N, Sebrechts Christopher P, Barone Robert M, Muller Wayne

机构信息

Sharp and Children's MRI Center, 7901 Frost St., San Diego, CA 92123, USA.

出版信息

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Aug;193(2):461-70. doi: 10.2214/AJR.08.1753.

DOI:10.2214/AJR.08.1753
PMID:19620444
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of our study was to evaluate the utility of single-shot spin-echo echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) using a b value of 400-500 s/mm(2) for depicting peritoneal tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-four consecutive oncology patients underwent preoperative abdominal and pelvic MRI for tumor staging. MRI included breath-hold DWI with a b value of 400-500 s/mm(2), T1-weighted spoiled gradient-echo, T2-weighted fast spin-echo, and 0- and 5-minute delayed gadolinium-enhanced imaging. At three separate sessions, two observers independently reviewed images for peritoneal tumors at 16 anatomic sites. First DWI alone was reviewed, followed by conventional MRI alone, and then conventional MRI, including DWI, was reviewed. Results of laparotomy and histopathologic evaluation were compared with MRI results. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated for DWI, conventional MRI, and combined DWI and conventional MRI for peritoneal tumor depiction.

RESULTS

Two-hundred fifty-five sites of peritoneal tumor were proven by surgical and histopathologic findings. The combination of DWI and conventional MRI was most sensitive and accurate for peritoneal tumors, depicting 230 and 214 tumor sites for the two observers (sensitivity, 0.90, 0.84; and accuracy, 0.91, 0.88) compared with DWI alone, which depicted 182 and 182 tumor sites with sensitivity (0.71, 0.71; and accuracy, 0.81, 0.81), and conventional MRI alone, which depicted 185 and 132 tumor sites (sensitivity, 0.73, 0.52; and accuracy, 0.81, 0.72). Peritoneal tumor showed restricted diffusion on DWI and ascites was of low signal intensity, increasing tumor conspicuity.

CONCLUSION

Adding DWI to routine MRI improves the sensitivity and specificity for depicting peritoneal metastases. Breath-hold DWI is now routinely used in all oncology patients referred for abdominal MRI at our institution.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估使用b值为400 - 500 s/mm²的单次激发自旋回波平面扩散加权成像(DWI)对腹膜肿瘤的诊断价值。

材料与方法

34例连续的肿瘤患者术前行腹部和盆腔MRI检查以进行肿瘤分期。MRI检查包括屏气DWI(b值为400 - 500 s/mm²)、T1加权扰相梯度回波序列、T2加权快速自旋回波序列以及0分钟和5分钟延迟钆增强成像。在三个不同阶段,两名观察者分别独立对16个解剖部位的腹膜肿瘤图像进行评估。首先单独评估DWI图像,接着单独评估传统MRI图像,然后评估包括DWI的传统MRI图像。将剖腹手术及组织病理学评估结果与MRI结果进行比较。计算DWI、传统MRI以及DWI与传统MRI联合用于腹膜肿瘤诊断的敏感性、特异性和准确性。

结果

手术及组织病理学检查证实255个腹膜肿瘤部位。DWI与传统MRI联合对腹膜肿瘤的诊断最为敏感和准确,两名观察者分别发现230个和214个肿瘤部位(敏感性分别为0.90、0.84;准确性分别为0.91、0.88);单独DWI发现182个和182个肿瘤部位(敏感性分别为0.71、0.71;准确性分别为0.81、0.81);单独传统MRI发现185个和132个肿瘤部位(敏感性分别为0.73、0.52;准确性分别为0.81、0.72)。腹膜肿瘤在DWI上表现为扩散受限,腹水呈低信号强度,提高了肿瘤的显影效果。

结论

在常规MRI检查中加入DWI可提高腹膜转移瘤诊断的敏感性和特异性。目前在我院,所有因腹部MRI检查而转诊的肿瘤患者均常规进行屏气DWI检查。

相似文献

1
Diffusion-weighted MRI of peritoneal tumors: comparison with conventional MRI and surgical and histopathologic findings--a feasibility study.腹膜肿瘤的扩散加权磁共振成像:与传统磁共振成像及手术和组织病理学结果的比较——一项可行性研究
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Aug;193(2):461-70. doi: 10.2214/AJR.08.1753.
2
Comparison of peritoneal tumor imaging using conventional MR imaging and diffusion-weighted MR imaging with different b values.比较不同 b 值的常规磁共振成像和扩散加权磁共振成像在腹膜肿瘤成像中的应用。
Eur J Radiol. 2011 Nov;80(2):224-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.06.004. Epub 2010 Jul 3.
3
Diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted MRI in the detection of nonpalpable undescended testes: comparison with conventional MRI and surgical findings.弥散加权 MRI 在检测不可触及隐睾中的诊断性能:与常规 MRI 和手术结果的比较。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Oct;195(4):W268-73. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.4221.
4
Diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) in the oncology patient: value of breathhold DWI compared to unenhanced and gadolinium-enhanced MRI.肿瘤患者的扩散加权磁共振成像(DWI):屏气DWI与未增强及钆增强磁共振成像的比较价值
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Apr;25(4):848-58. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20864.
5
Mucinous appendiceal neoplasms: preoperative MR staging and classification compared with surgical and histopathologic findings.黏液性阑尾肿瘤:术前磁共振成像分期及分类与手术及组织病理学结果的比较
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Mar;190(3):656-65. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.2018.
6
MR imaging of peritoneal disease: comparison of contrast-enhanced fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled and spin-echo imaging.腹膜疾病的磁共振成像:对比增强快速多平面扰相梯度回波成像与自旋回波成像的比较
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994 Nov;163(5):1131-40. doi: 10.2214/ajr.163.5.7976889.
7
Evaluation of malignant biliary obstruction: efficacy of fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled MR imaging vs spin-echo MR imaging, CT, and cholangiography.恶性胆管梗阻的评估:快速多平面扰相梯度回波磁共振成像与自旋回波磁共振成像、CT及胆管造影的效能比较
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994 Feb;162(2):315-23. doi: 10.2214/ajr.162.2.8310918.
8
Added value of breathhold diffusion-weighted MRI in detection of small hepatocellular carcinoma lesions compared with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI alone using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.与单独使用动态对比增强MRI相比,采用受试者操作特征曲线分析评估屏气扩散加权MRI在检测小肝细胞癌病变中的附加价值。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009 Feb;29(2):341-9. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21650.
9
[The value of breath-hold diffusion-weighted imaging in small hepatocellular carcinoma lesion (<or=3 cm) detection].[屏气扩散加权成像在小肝细胞癌病灶(≤3cm)检测中的价值]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2009 Mar 10;89(9):592-6.
10
Preoperative T categorization and prediction of histopathologic grading of urothelial carcinoma in renal pelvis using diffusion-weighted MRI.术前 T 分期及预测肾盂尿路上皮癌的病理分级的弥散加权 MRI 研究。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Nov;197(5):1130-6. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.6299.

引用本文的文献

1
CT and MR in peritoneal malignancies: pearls and pitfalls at preoperative examination.腹膜恶性肿瘤的CT与磁共振成像:术前检查的要点与陷阱
Insights Imaging. 2025 Aug 8;16(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s13244-025-02060-z.
2
ASO Practice Guideline Series: Management of Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases.ASO 实践指南系列:结直肠腹膜转移的管理
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17650-w.
3
Diagnostic performance of different imaging modalities for splenic malignancies: A comparative meta-analysis.不同成像方式对脾脏恶性肿瘤的诊断性能:一项比较性荟萃分析。
Eur J Radiol Open. 2024 Apr 22;12:100566. doi: 10.1016/j.ejro.2024.100566. eCollection 2024 Jun.
4
Imaging of Peritoneal Metastases in Ovarian Cancer Using MDCT, MRI, and FDG PET/CT: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.使用多层螺旋CT、MRI和氟代脱氧葡萄糖PET/CT对卵巢癌腹膜转移进行成像:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Apr 11;16(8):1467. doi: 10.3390/cancers16081467.
5
Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Peritoneal Metastases from Colorectal Cancer-An Overview of Current Status and Future Perspectives.结直肠癌腹膜转移的细胞减灭术和腹腔热灌注化疗——现状与未来展望综述
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jan 9;16(2):284. doi: 10.3390/cancers16020284.
6
Added value of regional F-FDG PET/MRI-assisted whole-body F-FDG PET/CT in malignant ascites with unknown primary origin.区域F-FDG PET/MRI辅助全身F-FDG PET/CT在原发性不明的恶性腹水中的附加价值。
Eur J Hybrid Imaging. 2023 Dec 4;7(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s41824-023-00179-0.
7
Appendiceal Mucinous Neoplasms: From Clinic to Pathology and Prognosis.阑尾黏液性肿瘤:从临床到病理及预后
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jun 30;15(13):3426. doi: 10.3390/cancers15133426.
8
Unravelling Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Using Cross-Sectional Imaging Modalities.利用横断面成像方式解析腹膜癌病
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jul 3;13(13):2253. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13132253.
9
[Incidental finding of appendiceal mucinous neoplasms].阑尾黏液性肿瘤的偶然发现
Chirurgie (Heidelb). 2023 Oct;94(10):832-839. doi: 10.1007/s00104-023-01910-0. Epub 2023 Jun 28.
10
Simultaneous multislice diffusion-weighted imaging versus standard diffusion-weighted imaging in whole-body PET/MRI.全身 PET/MRI 中同时多层扩散加权成像与标准扩散加权成像的比较。
Eur Radiol. 2023 Apr;33(4):2536-2547. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-09275-4. Epub 2022 Dec 3.