Suppr超能文献

一种评估24小时瘤胃体外中性洗涤纤维消化率的替代方法。

An alternative method to assess 24-h ruminal in vitro neutral detergent fiber digestibility.

作者信息

Goeser J P, Combs D K

机构信息

Department of Dairy Science, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA.

出版信息

J Dairy Sci. 2009 Aug;92(8):3833-41. doi: 10.3168/jds.2008-1136.

Abstract

Interassay error caused by the inconsistent nature of rumen fluid inoculum confounds comparisons of forage in vitro neutral detergent fiber (NDF) digestibility (NDFD) analyzed in different repetitions or laboratories. Our objective was to determine if priming rumen fluid and allowing it to produce a standard amount of gas before inoculating samples improved assay repeatability. In 2 experiments, we compared interassay error of NDFD estimates between several in vitro assays. In both experiments, dried, ground (1 mm) alfalfa samples (0.5 g) sealed in bags were placed in 125-mL Erlenmeyer flasks and incubated with in vitro media and 10 mL of rumen fluid. In experiment A, rumen fluid was collected from a cannulated cow fed a high forage diet and prepared one of 2 ways; rumen fluid was either used immediately after it was collected and strained through cheese cloth (GVA), or strained fluid was combined with buffer, reducing solution, and 12.5 mg of cellulose/mL of rumen fluid and allowed to produce a consistent amount of gas before inoculation (RPA). The assay was repeated 5 times, with 13 samples per method. In experiment B, inoculum was prepared one of 3 ways; RPA, GVA except rumen fluid was collected and pooled from 2 cows (GVB), or RPA with fluid pooled from 2 cows. The in vitro assays were repeated 5 times with 8 samples per method. Neutral detergent fiber was analyzed using a forage fiber analyzer and 24-h NDFD was determined as: NDFD (% of NDF) = 100 x [(NDF(0h) - NDF(residue))/(NDF(0h))]. Data for each experiment were analyzed using a mixed model procedure and repetition sum of squares for each technique was determined and compared with an F-test to assess technique interassay error. In both experiments, rumen fluid priming significantly reduced repetition sums of squares, 51.2 versus 503 and 23.3 versus 164, compared with the respective GVA or GVB. However, priming significantly decreased NDFD values, 22.5 versus 24.8 and 23.9 versus 26.6%, compared with GVA and GVB, respectively. Priming rumen fluid with cellulose improved in vitro NDFD assay precision, but depressed in vitro NDFD.

摘要

由于瘤胃液接种物性质不一致导致的批间误差,使得不同重复实验或不同实验室对饲草体外中性洗涤纤维(NDF)消化率(NDFD)的比较变得复杂。我们的目标是确定在接种样品前对瘤胃液进行预处理并使其产生标准量的气体是否能提高分析的重复性。在2个实验中,我们比较了几种体外分析方法中NDFD估计值的批间误差。在两个实验中,将密封在袋子里的干燥、磨碎(1毫米)的苜蓿样品(0.5克)放入125毫升锥形瓶中,与体外培养基和10毫升瘤胃液一起孵育。在实验A中,从饲喂高饲草日粮的瘘管牛收集瘤胃液,并采用两种方法之一进行处理;瘤胃液要么在收集后立即使用,并通过粗棉布过滤(GVA),要么将过滤后的液体与缓冲液、还原溶液以及每毫升瘤胃液12.5毫克纤维素混合,在接种前使其产生一致量的气体(RPA)。该分析重复5次,每种方法有13个样品。在实验B中,接种物采用三种方法之一制备;RPA、GVA(但瘤胃液是从2头牛收集并混合的,记为GVB),或RPA且液体是从2头牛收集并混合的。体外分析重复5次,每种方法有8个样品。使用饲草纤维分析仪分析中性洗涤纤维,并将24小时NDFD确定为:NDFD(占NDF的百分比)=100×[(NDF(0小时)-NDF(残渣))/(NDF(0小时))]。每个实验的数据使用混合模型程序进行分析,确定每种技术的重复平方和,并通过F检验进行比较,以评估技术批间误差。在两个实验中,与各自的GVA或GVB相比,瘤胃液预处理显著降低了重复平方和,分别为51.2对503以及23.3对164。然而,与GVA和GVB相比,预处理显著降低了NDFD值,分别为22.5%对24.8%以及23.9%对26.6%。用纤维素预处理瘤胃液提高了体外NDFD分析的精度,但降低了体外NDFD。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验