Suppr超能文献

基于CDISC标准的临床试验电子存档

CDISC standard-based electronic archiving of clinical trials.

作者信息

Kuchinke Wolfgang, Aerts J, Semler S C, Ohmann C

机构信息

Coordination Centre for Clinical Trials (KKS Düsseldorf), Heinrich Heine University, Medical Faculty, 40225 Duesseldorf, Germany.

出版信息

Methods Inf Med. 2009;48(5):408-13. doi: 10.3414/ME9236. Epub 2009 Jul 20.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Our objectives were to develop, based on the analysis of archived clinical trial documents and data and on the requirements of GCP-compliant electronic archiving, a concept for legally secure and technically feasible archiving of the entire clinical trial, including the essential documents of the trial master file and the study database.

METHODS

Based on own experiences with CDISC, existing implementations and future developments, CDISC standards were evaluated concerning requirements for archiving clinical studies. Trial master files of a small, medium and large clinical study were analyzed to collect specifications for electronic archiving of records.

RESULTS

Two different ways of long-term storage exist for the clinical trial archive: document-oriented archival and data archiving of the study database. The trial master file has a highly complex structure; its different parts can vary greatly in size, depending of the working style of investigators, number of patients recruited, the number of adverse event reports and the number of queries. The CDISC standard ODM is especially suited for archiving clinical trials, because among other features it contains the entire clinical trial data and full audit trail information. On the other hand SDTM is a content standard suited for data warehouses. Two recent developments in CDISC will affect the archival of studies: the further development of ODM in the area of "eCRF submission" and the use of "Electronic Source Data".

CONCLUSIONS

The complexity and size of the trial master file requires new solutions. Though ODM provides effective means to archive the study database, it shows still deficiencies, especially for the joint archiving of data and the complex documentation of the trial master file. A concept was developed in which the ODM standard is part of an integrated archiving of the trial data and documents. ODM archiving of the study database enables long-term storage which is GCP-compliant. Archiving of documents of the trial master file in PDF/A, including links and electronic signatures, as well as the storage of selected study data in a data warehouse at the sponsor site in SDTM are the other components of the concept.

摘要

目的

我们的目标是,基于对存档临床试验文档和数据的分析以及符合药品临床试验质量管理规范(GCP)的电子存档要求,制定一个关于整个临床试验合法安全且技术可行的存档概念,包括试验主文档的基本文件和研究数据库。

方法

基于自身在临床数据交换标准协会(CDISC)方面的经验、现有实施情况和未来发展,对CDISC标准在临床研究存档要求方面进行评估。分析了一个小型、中型和大型临床研究的试验主文档,以收集记录电子存档的规范。

结果

临床试验存档存在两种不同的长期存储方式:面向文档的存档和研究数据库的数据存档。试验主文档结构高度复杂;其不同部分的大小可能因研究者的工作方式、招募的患者数量、不良事件报告数量和查询数量而有很大差异。CDISC标准“研究数据管理(ODM)”特别适合存档临床试验,因为除其他功能外,它包含整个临床试验数据和完整的审计追踪信息。另一方面,“临床数据采集标准数据集(SDTM)”是一个适用于数据仓库的内容标准。CDISC最近的两项发展将影响研究的存档:“电子病例报告表提交”领域中ODM的进一步发展以及“电子源数据”的使用。

结论

试验主文档的复杂性和规模需要新的解决方案。虽然ODM为研究数据库存档提供了有效手段,但它仍存在不足,特别是在数据联合存档和试验主文档的复杂文档编制方面。我们制定了一个概念,其中ODM标准是试验数据和文档综合存档的一部分。研究数据库的ODM存档可实现符合GCP的长期存储。以PDF/A格式存档试验主文档的文件,包括链接和电子签名,以及在申办方站点的数据仓库中以SDTM格式存储选定的研究数据,是该概念的其他组成部分。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验