• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A Semi-Automated Term Harmonization Pipeline Applied to Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Clinical Trials.一种应用于肺动脉高压临床试验的半自动术语协调管道。
Methods Inf Med. 2022 May;61(1-02):3-10. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1739361. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
2
Evaluation of Natural Language Processing (NLP) systems to annotate drug product labeling with MedDRA terminology.评估自然语言处理 (NLP) 系统,以使用 MedDRA 术语对药品标签进行注释。
J Biomed Inform. 2018 Jul;83:73-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2018.05.019. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
3
Evaluating MedDRA-to-ICD terminology mappings.评估 MedDRA 到 ICD 的术语映射。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Feb 7;23(Suppl 4):299. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02375-1.
4
Ontological and Non-Ontological Resources for Associating Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities Terms to SNOMED Clinical Terms With Semantic Properties.用于将监管活动医学词典术语与具有语义属性的SNOMED临床术语相关联的本体论和非本体论资源。
Front Pharmacol. 2019 Sep 10;10:975. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00975. eCollection 2019.
5
Appraisal of the MedDRA conceptual structure for describing and grouping adverse drug reactions.对用于描述和分组药品不良反应的医学术语词典(MedDRA)概念结构的评估。
Drug Saf. 2005;28(1):19-34. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200528010-00002.
6
Methods and pitfalls in searching drug safety databases utilising the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA).利用《监管活动医学词典》(MedDRA)检索药物安全数据库的方法与陷阱
Drug Saf. 2003;26(3):145-58. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200326030-00002.
7
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
8
OntoADR a semantic resource describing adverse drug reactions to support searching, coding, and information retrieval.OntoADR是一种描述药物不良反应的语义资源,用于支持搜索、编码和信息检索。
J Biomed Inform. 2016 Oct;63:100-107. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2016.06.010. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
9
Patient free text reporting of symptomatic adverse events in cancer clinical research using the National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE).使用美国国家癌症研究所的患者报告结局版常见不良事件术语标准(PRO-CTCAE),对癌症临床研究中的症状性不良事件进行患者自由文本报告。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Apr 1;26(4):276-285. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocy169.
10
BAHAMA: A Bayesian Hierarchical Model for the Detection of MedDRA-Coded Adverse Events in Randomized Controlled Trials.BAHAMA:一种用于检测随机对照试验中 MedDRA 编码不良事件的贝叶斯层次模型。
Drug Saf. 2022 Sep;45(9):961-970. doi: 10.1007/s40264-022-01208-w. Epub 2022 Jul 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Response to Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Treatment Does Not Depend on Pulmonary Arterial Wedge Pressure: A Meta-Analysis Using Individual Participant Data from Randomized Clinical Trials.肺动脉高压治疗的临床反应不取决于肺动脉楔压:一项使用随机临床试验个体参与者数据的荟萃分析
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024 Sep 15;210(6):844-847. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202403-0612RL.
2
Novel Liver Injury Phenotypes and Outcomes in Clinical Trial Participants with Pulmonary Hypertension.临床试验中肺动脉高压患者的新型肝损伤表型和结局。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024 Oct 15;210(8):1045-1056. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202311-2196OC.
3
Pulmonary arterial hypertension treatment: an individual participant data network meta-analysis.肺动脉高压治疗:个体参与者数据网络荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J. 2024 Jun 1;45(21):1937-1952. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae049.
4
Electrocardiographic Abnormalities and Their Association with Outcomes in Randomized Clinical Trials of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.心电图异常及其与肺动脉高压随机临床试验结果的关系。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2024 Jun;21(6):858-865. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202307-609OC.
5
Is low-risk status a surrogate outcome in pulmonary arterial hypertension? An analysis of three randomised trials.低危状态是否是肺动脉高压的替代结局?三项随机试验的分析。
Lancet Respir Med. 2023 Oct;11(10):873-882. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(23)00155-8. Epub 2023 May 22.
6
Minimal Clinically Important Difference in the 6-minute-walk Distance for Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.肺动脉高压患者 6 分钟步行距离的最小临床重要差异。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2023 Apr 15;207(8):1070-1079. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202208-1547OC.

本文引用的文献

1
One Step Away from Technology but One Step Towards Domain Experts-MDRBridge: A Template-Based ISO 11179-Compliant Metadata Processing Pipeline.离技术一步之遥,离领域专家一步之近——MDRBridge:基于模板的符合ISO 11179的元数据处理管道。
Methods Inf Med. 2019 Dec;58(S 02):e72-e79. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-3399579. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
2
Development and use of a flexible data harmonization platform to facilitate the harmonization of individual patient data for meta-analyses.开发和使用一个灵活的数据协调平台,以促进个体患者数据的协调用于荟萃分析。
BMC Res Notes. 2019 Mar 22;12(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s13104-019-4210-7.
3
Data Harmonization for a Molecularly Driven Health System.分子驱动型健康系统的数据协调。
Cell. 2018 Aug 23;174(5):1045-1048. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.08.012.
4
A Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) layer implemented over i2b2.基于 i2b2 实现的快速医疗互操作性资源(FHIR)层。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Aug 14;17(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0513-6.
5
Identifying "super responders" in pulmonary arterial hypertension.识别肺动脉高压中的“超级反应者”。
Pulm Circ. 2017 Apr-Jun;7(2):300-311. doi: 10.1177/2045893217697708. Epub 2017 May 30.
6
Current applications and future directions for the CDISC Operational Data Model standard: A methodological review.CDISC操作数据模型标准的当前应用与未来方向:方法学综述
J Biomed Inform. 2016 Apr;60:352-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2016.02.016. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
7
BMPR2 mutations and survival in pulmonary arterial hypertension: an individual participant data meta-analysis.BMPR2 突变与肺动脉高压患者生存:一项个体参与者数据荟萃分析。
Lancet Respir Med. 2016 Feb;4(2):129-37. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00544-5. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
8
Selexipag for the Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.塞乐西帕用于肺动脉高压的治疗。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Dec 24;373(26):2522-33. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1503184.
9
Integrated Data Repository Toolkit (IDRT). A Suite of Programs to Facilitate Health Analytics on Heterogeneous Medical Data.集成数据存储库工具包(IDRT)。一套用于促进对异构医学数据进行健康分析的程序。
Methods Inf Med. 2016;55(2):125-35. doi: 10.3414/ME15-01-0082. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
10
A Generic Data Harmonization Process for Cross-linked Research and Network Interaction. Construction and Application for the Lung Cancer Phenotype Database of the German Center for Lung Research.一种用于交叉研究和网络交互的通用数据协调过程。德国肺部研究中心肺癌表型数据库的构建与应用。
Methods Inf Med. 2015;54(5):455-60. doi: 10.3414/ME14-02-0030. Epub 2015 Sep 17.

一种应用于肺动脉高压临床试验的半自动术语协调管道。

A Semi-Automated Term Harmonization Pipeline Applied to Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Clinical Trials.

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.

Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States.

出版信息

Methods Inf Med. 2022 May;61(1-02):3-10. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1739361. Epub 2021 Nov 24.

DOI:10.1055/s-0041-1739361
PMID:34820791
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9978994/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Data harmonization is essential to integrate individual participant data from multiple sites, time periods, and trials for meta-analysis. The process of mapping terms and phrases to an ontology is complicated by typographic errors, abbreviations, truncation, and plurality. We sought to harmonize medical history (MH) and adverse events (AE) term records across 21 randomized clinical trials in pulmonary arterial hypertension and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.

METHODS

We developed and applied a semi-automated harmonization pipeline for use with domain-expert annotators to resolve ambiguous term mappings using exact and fuzzy matching. We summarized MH and AE term mapping success, including map quality measures, and imputation of a generalizing term hierarchy as defined by the applied Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) ontology standard.

RESULTS

Over 99.6% of both MH ( = 37,105) and AE ( = 58,170) records were successfully mapped to MedDRA low-level terms. Automated exact matching accounted for 74.9% of MH and 85.5% of AE mappings. Term recommendations from fuzzy matching in the pipeline facilitated annotator mapping of the remaining 24.9% of MH and 13.8% of AE records. Imputation of the generalized MedDRA term hierarchy was unambiguous in 85.2% of high-level terms, 99.4% of high-level group terms, and 99.5% of system organ class in MH, and 75% of high-level terms, 98.3% of high-level group terms, and 98.4% of system organ class in AE.

CONCLUSION

This pipeline dramatically reduced the burden of manual annotation for MH and AE term harmonization and could be adapted to other data integration efforts.

摘要

目的

数据协调对于整合来自多个地点、时间段和试验的个体参与者数据进行荟萃分析至关重要。将术语和短语映射到本体的过程由于印刷错误、缩写、截断和复数形式而变得复杂。我们试图协调 21 项肺动脉高压和慢性血栓栓塞性肺动脉高压随机临床试验中的病史 (MH) 和不良事件 (AE) 术语记录。

方法

我们开发并应用了一个半自动协调管道,供领域专家注释器使用,以使用精确和模糊匹配来解决模糊的术语映射。我们总结了 MH 和 AE 术语映射的成功,包括映射质量度量以及根据应用的监管活动医学词典 (MedDRA) 本体标准推断概括术语层次结构。

结果

超过 99.6%的 MH( = 37105)和 AE( = 58170)记录成功映射到 MedDRA 低级术语。自动精确匹配占 MH 的 74.9%和 AE 的 85.5%。管道中的模糊匹配推荐的术语有助于注释器映射 MH 剩余的 24.9%和 AE 记录的 13.8%。在 MH 中,广义 MedDRA 术语层次结构的推断在 85.2%的高级术语、99.4%的高级组术语和 99.5%的系统器官类别中是明确的,在 75%的高级术语、98.3%的高级组术语和 98.4%的系统器官类别中是明确的。AE。

结论

该管道大大减轻了 MH 和 AE 术语协调的手动注释负担,并且可以适应其他数据集成工作。