• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

合理使用利尿剂治疗高血压:俄罗斯ARGUS-2研究结果

Treating hypertension by rational use of diuretics: results of the Russian ARGUS-2 Study.

作者信息

Kobalava Z D, Kotovskaya Y V, Villevalde S V, Moiseev V S

机构信息

Russian Peoples' Friendship University, Moscow, Russian Federation.

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 2009 Sep;25(9):2229-37. doi: 10.1185/03007990903157531.

DOI:10.1185/03007990903157531
PMID:19622008
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Insufficient use of diuretics in combination antihypertensive therapy is a main cause of poor blood pressure (BP) control in Russia. The objective of the ARGUS-2 study was to demonstrate that a rational use of a thiazide-like diuretic, indapamide sustained release (SR), alone or in combination, improves BP control in patients with arterial hypertension difficult to control due to isolated systolic hypertension (ISH), diabetes mellitus (DM), chronic nephropathy, or metabolic syndrome.

METHODS

The open-label, non-comparative, 3-month study without preliminary washout included 1438 hypertensive patients (mean age: 57.3 +/- 10.7 years, mean BP: 158.8 +/- 14.2/93.4 +/- 10.0 mmHg), with difficult-to-control arterial hypertension and who had never been treated with diuretics previously. Throughout the study, patients received indapamide SR 1.5 mg OD. BP control was defined as <140/90 mmHg for all patients and <130/80 mmHg for those with diabetes mellitus or chronic nephropathy.

RESULTS

Indapamide SR was given as initiation monotherapy to 13.7% of the patients, as substitutive monotherapy to 6.8% of the patients uncontrolled by a previous monotherapy, as additive therapy to 31.9% of the patients uncontrolled by previous monotherapy, and as additive therapy to 47.6% uncontrolled by previous combination therapy without a diuretic. Among included patients 75.7% received also an ACE inhibitor or an angiotensin II receptors blocker, 43.9% a calcium channel blocker, and 32.8% a beta-blocker. In 3 months after indapamide SR administration, average BP level decreased to 131.8 +/- 9.7/80.5 +/- 6.9 mmHg and 84.5% of the study population achieved BP control. BP was controlled in 91.9% of patients with ISH (n = 477), 74.8% of those with diabetes (n = 214), 75.6% of those with chronic nephropathy (n = 82), and 85.1% of patients with metabolic syndrome (n = 745). No case of hypokalemia was reported.

CONCLUSION

The study demonstrates the value of including the thiazide-like diuretic indapamide SR in a combined antihypertensive regimen to control BP in hypertensive patients with added cardiovascular risk factors whose hypertension is difficult to treat. Methodological limitations of this study are its open-label design and the possibility of a change in concomitant antihypertensive treatment during the study.

摘要

目的

在俄罗斯,联合抗高血压治疗中利尿剂使用不足是血压(BP)控制不佳的主要原因。ARGUS - 2研究的目的是证明合理使用噻嗪类利尿剂吲达帕胺缓释片(SR),单独使用或联合使用,可改善因单纯收缩期高血压(ISH)、糖尿病(DM)、慢性肾病或代谢综合征导致难以控制的动脉高血压患者的血压控制情况。

方法

这项开放标签、非对照、为期3个月且无预洗脱期的研究纳入了1438例高血压患者(平均年龄:57.3±10.7岁,平均血压:158.8±14.2/93.4±10.0 mmHg),这些患者患有难以控制的动脉高血压且此前从未接受过利尿剂治疗。在整个研究过程中,患者每日服用1.5 mg吲达帕胺缓释片。所有患者的血压控制定义为<140/90 mmHg,糖尿病或慢性肾病患者的血压控制定义为<130/80 mmHg。

结果

13.7%的患者起始使用吲达帕胺缓释片进行单药治疗,6.8%的患者在先前单药治疗未控制血压的情况下使用吲达帕胺缓释片进行替代单药治疗,31.9%的患者在先前单药治疗未控制血压的情况下使用吲达帕胺缓释片进行联合治疗,47.6%的患者在先前无利尿剂的联合治疗未控制血压的情况下使用吲达帕胺缓释片进行联合治疗。纳入研究的患者中,75.7%还接受了血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂或血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂治疗,43.9%接受了钙通道阻滞剂治疗,32.8%接受了β受体阻滞剂治疗。在服用吲达帕胺缓释片3个月后,平均血压水平降至131.8±9.7/80.5±6.9 mmHg,84.5%的研究人群实现了血压控制。ISH患者(n = 477)中91.9%的患者血压得到控制,糖尿病患者(n = 214)中74.8%的患者血压得到控制,慢性肾病患者(n = 82)中75.6%的患者血压得到控制,代谢综合征患者(n = 745)中85.1%的患者血压得到控制。未报告低钾血症病例。

结论

该研究证明了在联合抗高血压方案中加入噻嗪类利尿剂吲达帕胺缓释片对控制伴有心血管危险因素且高血压难以治疗的高血压患者血压的价值。本研究的方法学局限性在于其开放标签设计以及研究期间联合抗高血压治疗可能发生变化。

相似文献

1
Treating hypertension by rational use of diuretics: results of the Russian ARGUS-2 Study.合理使用利尿剂治疗高血压:俄罗斯ARGUS-2研究结果
Curr Med Res Opin. 2009 Sep;25(9):2229-37. doi: 10.1185/03007990903157531.
2
Antihypertensive efficacy of indapamide SR in hypertensive patients uncontrolled with a background therapy: the NATIVE study.吲达帕胺缓释片在接受背景治疗仍血压控制不佳的高血压患者中的降压疗效:NATIVE研究
Curr Med Res Opin. 2007 Dec;23(12):2929-36. doi: 10.1185/030079907X242674.
3
Efficacy of indapamide 1.5 mg, sustained release, in the lowering of systolic blood pressure.1.5毫克缓释吲达帕胺降低收缩压的疗效
J Hum Hypertens. 2004 Dec;18 Suppl 2:S9-S14. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001799.
4
Shifting trends in the pharmacologic treatment of hypertension in a Nigerian tertiary hospital: a real-world evaluation of the efficacy, safety, rationality and pharmaco-economics of old and newer antihypertensive drugs.尼日利亚一家三级医院高血压药物治疗的趋势变化:对新旧抗高血压药物的疗效、安全性、合理性和药物经济学的真实世界评估
J Hum Hypertens. 2003 Apr;17(4):277-85. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001538.
5
Efficacy and tolerability of the perindopril/indapamide combination therapy for hypertension: the PRIMUS study.培哚普利/吲达帕胺联合治疗高血压的疗效和耐受性:PRIMUS研究
Curr Med Res Opin. 2006 Sep;22(9):1849-58. doi: 10.1185/030079906X132433.
6
A 26-week, prospective, open-label, uncontrolled, multicenter study to evaluate the effect of an escalating-dose regimen of trandolapril on change in blood pressure in treatment-naive and concurrently treated adult hypertensive subjects (TRAIL).一项为期26周的前瞻性、开放标签、非对照、多中心研究,旨在评估逐步递增剂量的群多普利方案对初治和同时接受治疗的成年高血压受试者血压变化的影响(TRAIL研究)。
Clin Ther. 2007 Feb;29(2):305-15. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.02.016.
7
Effects of a fixed-dose ACE inhibitor-diuretic combination on ambulatory blood pressure and arterial properties in isolated systolic hypertension.固定剂量血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂-利尿剂联合用药对单纯收缩期高血压患者动态血压及动脉特性的影响
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2008 Jun;51(6):590-5. doi: 10.1097/FJC.0b013e31817a8316.
8
[Inadequate treatment and control of arterial hypertension in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus].2型糖尿病患者动脉高血压的治疗与控制不足
G Ital Nefrol. 2002 Jul-Aug;19(4):413-8.
9
Managing hypertension in high-risk patients: lessons and promises from the STRATHE and ADVANCE trials.高危患者的高血压管理:STRATHE和ADVANCE试验的经验与前景
J Hypertens Suppl. 2006 May;24(3):S19-27. doi: 10.1097/01.hjh.0000229465.09610.b6.
10
Effect of indapamide SR on microalbuminuria--the NESTOR study (Natrilix SR versus Enalapril Study in Type 2 diabetic hypertensives with micrOalbuminuRia)--rationale and protocol for the main trial.吲达帕胺缓释片对微量白蛋白尿的影响——NESTOR研究(纳催离缓释片与依那普利治疗2型糖尿病合并微量白蛋白尿高血压患者的研究)——主要试验的原理与方案
J Hypertens Suppl. 2003 Mar;21(1):S19-24.

引用本文的文献

1
Simulating the impact of improved cardiovascular risk interventions on clinical and economic outcomes in Russia.模拟改善心血管疾病风险干预措施对俄罗斯临床和经济结果的影响。
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 20;9(8):e103280. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103280. eCollection 2014.
2
Diuretics for hypertension-reasons for a contradiction in primary care prescribing behavior: a qualitative study.利尿剂治疗高血压——基层医疗处方行为矛盾的原因:一项定性研究。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2012 Oct;14(10):680-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2012.00680.x. Epub 2012 Jul 9.
3
A case of hypokalemia-induced fatal arrhythmia caused by indapamide in an anorexic elderly patient.
一例因厌食老年患者服用吲达帕胺导致低钾血症引起的致命性心律失常。
Clin Exp Nephrol. 2011 Oct;15(5):761-764. doi: 10.1007/s10157-011-0474-5. Epub 2011 Jun 15.
4
The Rise and Fall of Hypertension: Lessons Learned from Eastern Europe.高血压的兴衰:东欧的经验教训
Curr Cardiovasc Risk Rep. 2011 Apr;5(2):174-179. doi: 10.1007/s12170-010-0152-2. Epub 2011 Jan 6.