Suppr超能文献

加压液体萃取土壤微生物磷脂和中性脂脂肪酸。

Pressurized liquid extraction of soil microbial phospholipid and neutral lipid fatty acids.

机构信息

Southeast Watershed Research Unit, Pesticide Residue Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Tifton, Georgia 31793, USA.

出版信息

J Agric Food Chem. 2009 Aug 26;57(16):7171-7. doi: 10.1021/jf901257n.

Abstract

Soil microbial lipid biomarkers are indicators of viable microbial biomass and community structure. Pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) of soil phospholipid fatty acids (PLFA) and neutral lipid fatty acids (NLFA) was compared to a conventional extraction method in four soils with differing physical and chemical properties. PLE efficiency was greater than that of the conventional method for about half of the saturated PLFA and for selected other Gram-positive (i16:0) and Gram-negative bacteria (18:1omega7c) PLFA, fungal PLFA (18:2omega6,9c), and eukaryotic NLFA from a coarse-textured soil. Lipids extracted by the two methods did not indicate a significant difference in microbial community structure data. Principle component analysis revealed that PLFA clustered by location, with data indicating that the group of microbes contributing the greatest weight differed among soils. Overall, the PLE method proved to be more efficient at extracting soilborne microbial lipids while not altering microbial community information. These advantages indicate the PLE method is robust and well-suited to soil microbial ecology research.

摘要

土壤微生物脂质生物标志物是可存活微生物生物量和群落结构的指示物。在具有不同物理和化学性质的四种土壤中,比较了加压液体提取(PLE)土壤磷脂脂肪酸(PLFA)和中性脂脂肪酸(NLFA)与传统提取方法。对于大约一半的饱和 PLFA 和选定的其他革兰氏阳性(i16:0)和革兰氏阴性细菌(18:1omega7c)PLFA、真菌 PLFA(18:2omega6,9c)和来自粗质地土壤的真核 NLFA,PLE 的效率大于传统方法。两种方法提取的脂质在微生物群落结构数据中没有表明存在显著差异。主成分分析表明,PLFA 按位置聚类,数据表明,在不同土壤中,对微生物贡献最大的微生物群不同。总的来说,PLE 方法在提取土壤微生物脂质方面更有效,而不会改变微生物群落信息。这些优势表明 PLE 方法稳健且非常适合土壤微生物生态学研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验