• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

德国引入患者自付费用对 IVF 和 ICSI 使用的影响:需求价格弹性评估。

The impact of introducing patient co-payments in Germany on the use of IVF and ICSI: a price-elasticity of demand assessment.

机构信息

Unit of PharmacoEpidemiology & PharmacoEconomics, Department of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Hum Reprod. 2009 Nov;24(11):2796-800. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep260. Epub 2009 Jul 22.

DOI:10.1093/humrep/dep260
PMID:19625316
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Authorities concerned by rising healthcare costs have a tendency to target reproductive treatments because of the perception that infertility is a low priority. In 2004 German health authorities introduced a 50% co-payment for patients, in an effort to save cost. We explored the impact of this pricing policy on the utilization of reproductive treatments in Germany.

METHODS

Using aggregated annual in-vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycle data in Germany, we evaluated the relationship between changes in the number of cycles in relation to changes in costs faced by consumers following the introduction of a patient co-payment from 'no fees' to 1500-2000 euros by estimating the short-run price-elasticity of demand. The impact of introducing patient co-payments for IVF/ICSI on the likelihood of switching to other low-cost fertility treatments was evaluated using the cross-price elasticity methodology. RESULTS The reduction in demand for IVF and ICSI cycles in the year following the introduction of patient co-payments resulted in elasticities of -0.41 and -0.34, respectively. The price-elasticity for the combined reduction of IVF/ICSI in relation to the co-payment was estimated to be -0.36. The cross-price elasticity for clomifene was close to zero (-0.01) suggesting that demand for these interventions are independent of each other and no substitution occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

We report price elasticities for IVF and ICSI of -0.41 and -0.34 after introducing a 500-2000 euros co-payment. These findings likely represent short-run elasticities that are likely to vary over time as factors that influence the supply and demand for fertility treatments change.

摘要

背景

由于认为不孕不育不是优先事项,有关当局往往倾向于针对生殖治疗来控制医疗成本的增长。2004 年,德国卫生当局对患者实行了 50%的共付额,以节省成本。我们探讨了这项定价政策对德国生殖治疗利用的影响。

方法

使用德国汇总的年度体外受精(IVF)和胞浆内精子注射(ICSI)周期数据,我们通过估计引入患者共付额后(从“无费用”到 1500-2000 欧元)消费者面临的成本变化与周期数量变化之间的关系,评估了需求的短期价格弹性。使用交叉价格弹性方法评估了引入 IVF/ICSI 患者共付额对转向其他低成本生育治疗的可能性的影响。

结果

引入患者共付额后,IVF 和 ICSI 周期的需求减少,分别导致需求弹性为-0.41 和-0.34。共付额与 IVF/ICSI 联合减少的价格弹性估计为-0.36。氯米芬的交叉价格弹性接近零(-0.01),表明这些干预措施的需求彼此独立,没有发生替代。

结论

我们报告了引入 500-2000 欧元共付额后 IVF 和 ICSI 的价格弹性分别为-0.41 和-0.34。这些发现可能代表短期内的弹性,随着影响生育治疗供需的因素发生变化,这些弹性可能会随时间而变化。

相似文献

1
The impact of introducing patient co-payments in Germany on the use of IVF and ICSI: a price-elasticity of demand assessment.德国引入患者自付费用对 IVF 和 ICSI 使用的影响:需求价格弹性评估。
Hum Reprod. 2009 Nov;24(11):2796-800. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep260. Epub 2009 Jul 22.
2
A detailed cost analysis of in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment.体外受精与卵胞浆内单精子注射治疗的详细成本分析。
Fertil Steril. 2008 Feb;89(2):331-41. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.03.003. Epub 2007 Jul 26.
3
The impact of cost sharing of prescription drug expenditures on health care utilization by the elderly: own- and cross-price elasticities.处方药支出费用分担对老年人医疗保健利用的影响:自价格弹性和交叉价格弹性
Health Policy. 2007 Aug;82(3):340-7. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2006.11.002. Epub 2006 Nov 28.
4
Use and outcomes of intracytoplasmic sperm injection for non-male factor infertility.非男性因素不孕症的卵胞浆内单精子注射的应用及结局
Fertil Steril. 2007 Sep;88(3):622-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.12.013. Epub 2007 Apr 18.
5
[Twenty years of in vitro fertilization: realization and questions for the future].[体外受精二十年:成就与未来之问]
Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg. 2001;63(3):193-240; discussion 240-1.
6
Sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA) parameters are related to fertilization, blastocyst development, and ongoing pregnancy in in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles.精子染色质结构分析(SCSA)参数与体外受精和卵胞浆内单精子注射周期中的受精、囊胚发育及持续妊娠相关。
Fertil Steril. 2004 May;81(5):1289-95. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.09.063.
7
Blastocyst formation in in vitro fertilization versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles: influence of the fertilization procedure.体外受精与卵胞浆内单精子注射周期中囊胚形成:受精程序的影响
Fertil Steril. 2005 May;83(5):1397-403. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.10.054.
8
International collaborative study of intracytoplasmic sperm injection-conceived, in vitro fertilization-conceived, and naturally conceived 5-year-old child outcomes: cognitive and motor assessments.胞浆内单精子注射受孕、体外受精受孕及自然受孕5岁儿童结局的国际合作研究:认知与运动评估
Pediatrics. 2005 Mar;115(3):e283-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1445.
9
Conventional in vitro fertilization versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection in patients with borderline semen: a randomized study using sibling oocytes.精液质量临界患者常规体外受精与卵胞浆内单精子注射的比较:一项使用姐妹卵母细胞的随机研究。
Fertil Steril. 2006 Feb;85(2):395-400. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.05.077.
10
Pregnancy loss in pregnancies conceived after in vitro oocyte maturation, conventional in vitro fertilization, and intracytoplasmic sperm injection.体外卵母细胞成熟、常规体外受精和卵胞浆内单精子注射后受孕的妊娠丢失情况。
Fertil Steril. 2008 Sep;90(3):546-50. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.06.107. Epub 2007 Sep 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Policy solutions to improve access to fertility treatment and optimise patient care: consensus from an expert forum.改善生育治疗可及性并优化患者护理的政策解决方案:专家论坛共识
Front Reprod Health. 2025 Aug 29;7:1605480. doi: 10.3389/frph.2025.1605480. eCollection 2025.
2
Impact of lower co-payments on risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy and BRCA testing in Japan.降低自付费用对日本降低风险的输卵管卵巢切除术和BRCA检测的影响。
Arch Public Health. 2023 Feb 27;81(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s13690-023-01048-9.
3
Out-of-pocket payment and patients' treatment choice for assisted reproductive technology by household income: a conjoint analysis using an online social research panel in Japan.
家庭收入对辅助生殖技术自付费用和患者治疗选择的影响:使用日本在线社会研究小组的联合分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Aug 27;22(1):1093. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08474-5.
4
Use of assisted reproductive technologies before and after the Artificial Reproduction Act in Taiwan.台湾《人工生殖法》前后使用辅助生殖技术的情况。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 1;13(11):e0206208. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206208. eCollection 2018.
5
A reduction in public funding for fertility treatment--an econometric analysis of access to treatment and savings to government.公共资金减少对生育治疗的影响-对治疗途径和政府节省的经济计量分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Jun 8;12:142. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-142.
6
Utilization of infertility treatments: the effects of insurance mandates.不孕症治疗的利用:保险要求的影响。
Demography. 2012 Feb;49(1):125-49. doi: 10.1007/s13524-011-0078-4.
7
Expensive but worth it: older parents' attitudes and opinions about the costs and insurance coverage for in vitro fertilization.昂贵但值得:年长父母对体外受精费用和保险覆盖范围的态度和看法。
Fertil Steril. 2012 Jan;97(1):82-7. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.10.019. Epub 2011 Nov 25.