• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公共资金减少对生育治疗的影响-对治疗途径和政府节省的经济计量分析。

A reduction in public funding for fertility treatment--an econometric analysis of access to treatment and savings to government.

机构信息

Perinatal and Reproductive Epidemiology Research Unit, The University of New South Wales, Level 2, McNevin Dickson Building, Randwick Hospitals Campus, Sydney 2031, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Jun 8;12:142. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-142.

DOI:10.1186/1472-6963-12-142
PMID:22682009
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3464128/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Almost all assisted reproductive technology (ART) and intrauterine insemination (IUI) treatments performed in Australia are subsidized through the Australian Government's universal insurance scheme, Medicare. In 2010 restrictions on the amount Medicare paid in benefits for these treatments were introduced, increasing patient out-of-pocket payments for fresh and frozen embryo ART cycles and IUI. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the policy on access to treatment, savings in Medicare benefits and the number of ART conceived children not born.

METHODS

Pooled quarterly cross-sectional Medicare data from 2007 and 2011 where used to construct a series of Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression models to evaluate the impact of the policy on access to treatment by women of different ages. Government savings in the 12 months after the policy was calculated as the difference between the predicted and observed Medicare benefits paid.

RESULTS

After controlling for underlying time trends and unobserved factors the policy change reduced the number of fresh embryo cycles by almost 8600 cycles over 12 months (a 16% reduction in cycles, p < 0.001). The policy effect was greatest on women aged 40 years and older (38% reduction in cycles, p < 0.001). Younger women engaged in relatively more anticipatory behaviour by bringing forward their fresh cycles to 2009. Frozen embryo cycles, which are approximately one quarter of the cost of a fresh cycle, were only marginally impacted by the policy. Utilisation of IUI cycles were not impacted by the policy. After adjusting for anticipatory behaviour, $76 million in Medicare benefits was saved in the 12 months after the policy change (0.47% of annual Medicare benefits). Between 1200 and 1500 ART conceived children were not born in 2010 as a consequence of the policy.

CONCLUSIONS

The introduction of the policy resulted in a significant reduction in fresh ART cycles in the first 15 months after its introduction. Further evaluation on the long-term impact of the policy with regard access to treatment and on clinical practice, particularly the number of embryos transferred, is crucial to ensuring equitable access to fertility treatment and the health and welfare of ART children.

摘要

背景

在澳大利亚,几乎所有的辅助生殖技术(ART)和宫腔内人工授精(IUI)治疗都通过澳大利亚政府的全民医疗保险计划 Medicare 来补贴。2010 年,对这些治疗的 Medicare 报销金额进行了限制,增加了新鲜和冷冻胚胎 ART 周期以及 IUI 的患者自费支付额。本研究旨在评估该政策对治疗机会、医疗保险节省和未出生的 ART 受孕儿童数量的影响。

方法

使用 2007 年和 2011 年的 Medicare 季度汇总横断面数据构建一系列普通最小二乘(OLS)回归模型,以评估该政策对不同年龄段女性获得治疗的影响。政策实施后 12 个月内的政府节省额计算为预测和实际 Medicare 报销金额之间的差值。

结果

在控制潜在的时间趋势和未观察到的因素后,该政策变化导致 12 个月内新鲜胚胎周期减少了近 8600 个周期(周期减少 16%,p<0.001)。该政策对 40 岁及以上的女性影响最大(周期减少 38%,p<0.001)。年轻女性通过提前到 2009 年进行新鲜周期来进行更多的预期行为。冷冻胚胎周期,其成本约为新鲜周期的四分之一,仅受到政策的轻微影响。IUI 周期的使用不受政策影响。调整预期行为后,政策变化后 12 个月内 Medicare 节省了 7600 万美元(占 Medicare 年度支出的 0.47%)。由于该政策,2010 年有 1200 至 1500 名 ART 受孕儿童未出生。

结论

该政策的实施导致其实施后的头 15 个月内新鲜 ART 周期显著减少。进一步评估该政策对治疗机会和临床实践的长期影响,特别是胚胎移植数量,对于确保公平获得生育治疗以及 ART 儿童的健康和福利至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3661/3464128/5a773507c0a7/1472-6963-12-142-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3661/3464128/b2c48910adde/1472-6963-12-142-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3661/3464128/8743eac2a0d5/1472-6963-12-142-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3661/3464128/a8e9563f3e5a/1472-6963-12-142-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3661/3464128/5a773507c0a7/1472-6963-12-142-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3661/3464128/b2c48910adde/1472-6963-12-142-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3661/3464128/8743eac2a0d5/1472-6963-12-142-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3661/3464128/a8e9563f3e5a/1472-6963-12-142-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3661/3464128/5a773507c0a7/1472-6963-12-142-4.jpg

相似文献

1
A reduction in public funding for fertility treatment--an econometric analysis of access to treatment and savings to government.公共资金减少对生育治疗的影响-对治疗途径和政府节省的经济计量分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Jun 8;12:142. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-142.
2
Socioeconomic disparities in access to ART treatment and the differential impact of a policy that increased consumer costs.社会经济差异对接受抗逆转录病毒治疗的影响,以及一项增加消费者成本的政策的不同影响。
Hum Reprod. 2013 Nov;28(11):3111-7. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det302. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
3
Residential proximity to a fertility clinic is independently associated with likelihood of women having ART and IUI treatment.住宅与生育诊所的距离与女性接受辅助生殖技术(ART)和宫腔内人工授精(IUI)治疗的可能性独立相关。
Hum Reprod. 2022 Oct 31;37(11):2662-2671. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac205.
4
In vitro fertilization and multiple pregnancies: an evidence-based analysis.体外受精与多胎妊娠:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2006;6(18):1-63. Epub 2006 Oct 1.
5
Assisted reproductive technology: public funding and the voluntary shift to single embryo transfer in Australia.辅助生殖技术:澳大利亚公共资金与自愿向单胚胎移植的转变。
Med J Aust. 2011 Nov 21;195(10):594-8. doi: 10.5694/mja10.11448.
6
Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance — United States, 2012.辅助生殖技术监测—美国,2012 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2015 Aug 14;64(6):1-29.
7
International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies world report: assisted reproductive technology 2012†.国际辅助生殖技术监测委员会世界报告:辅助生殖技术 2012 年报告†。
Hum Reprod. 2020 Aug 1;35(8):1900-1913. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa090.
8
Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2012: results generated from European registers by ESHRE.2012年欧洲辅助生殖技术:欧洲人类生殖与胚胎学会(ESHRE)基于欧洲登记处得出的结果
Hum Reprod. 2016 Aug;31(8):1638-52. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew151. Epub 2016 Jun 19.
9
Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2011.辅助生殖技术监测——美国,2011 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2014 Nov 21;63(10):1-28.
10
Is IVF-served two different ways-more cost-effective than IUI with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation?试管婴儿服务有两种不同方式——比控制性卵巢过度刺激下的宫腔内人工授精更具成本效益吗?
Hum Reprod. 2015 Oct;30(10):2331-9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev193. Epub 2015 Aug 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Luteal Phase Support in IVF: Comparison Between Evidence-Based Medicine and Real-Life Practices.体外受精中的黄体支持:循证医学与实际操作的比较。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2020 Aug 18;11:500. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.00500. eCollection 2020.
2
Corifollitropin alfa versus follitropin beta: an economic analysis alongside a randomized controlled trial in women undergoing IVF/ICSI.注射用重组促卵泡素α与重组促卵泡素β的比较:一项针对接受体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射的女性的随机对照试验及经济学分析。
Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2020 Feb 22;10:28-36. doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2020.01.002. eCollection 2020 Jun.
3
The association between reproductive health smartphone applications and fertility knowledge of Australian women.

本文引用的文献

1
Assisted reproductive technology: public funding and the voluntary shift to single embryo transfer in Australia.辅助生殖技术:澳大利亚公共资金与自愿向单胚胎移植的转变。
Med J Aust. 2011 Nov 21;195(10):594-8. doi: 10.5694/mja10.11448.
2
The effects of insurance mandates on choices and outcomes in infertility treatment markets.保险强制规定对不孕治疗市场选择和结果的影响。
Health Econ. 2012 Aug;21(8):994-1016. doi: 10.1002/hec.1776. Epub 2011 Sep 9.
3
International Federation of Fertility Societies Surveillance 2010: preface.国际生育学会监测 2010:前言。
澳大利亚女性生殖健康智能手机应用程序与生育知识之间的关联。
BMC Womens Health. 2020 Mar 4;20(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12905-020-00912-y.
4
Assisted Reproductive Technologies in Latin America and Europe: a Comparative Analysis of Reported Databases for 2013.拉丁美洲和欧洲的辅助生殖技术:2013年报告数据库的比较分析
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2019 Aug;41(8):493-499. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1693680. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
5
Oral dydrogesterone versus intravaginal micronized progesterone gel for luteal phase support in IVF: a randomized clinical trial.口服地屈孕酮与阴道内给予微粒化黄体酮凝胶用于体外受精中黄体期支持的比较:一项随机临床试验。
Hum Reprod. 2018 Dec 1;33(12):2212-2221. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey306.
6
A Phase III randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy, safety and tolerability of oral dydrogesterone versus micronized vaginal progesterone for luteal support in in vitro fertilization.一项比较口服地屈孕酮与微粒化阴道孕酮在体外受精中黄体支持的疗效、安全性和耐受性的III期随机对照试验。
Hum Reprod. 2017 May 1;32(5):1019-1027. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex023.
Fertil Steril. 2011 Feb;95(2):491. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.08.011.
4
Insurance coverage and in vitro fertilization outcomes: a U.S. perspective.保险覆盖范围和体外受精结局:美国视角。
Fertil Steril. 2011 Mar 1;95(3):964-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.06.030. Epub 2010 Aug 5.
5
Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2006: results generated from European registers by ESHRE.欧洲 2006 年辅助生殖技术:ESHRE 欧洲注册处提供的结果。
Hum Reprod. 2010 Aug;25(8):1851-62. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deq124. Epub 2010 Jun 22.
6
International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) and the World Health Organization (WHO) revised glossary of ART terminology, 2009.国际辅助生殖技术监测委员会(ICMART)与世界卫生组织(WHO)2009年修订的辅助生殖技术术语词汇表
Fertil Steril. 2009 Nov;92(5):1520-4. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.09.009. Epub 2009 Oct 14.
7
The impact of introducing patient co-payments in Germany on the use of IVF and ICSI: a price-elasticity of demand assessment.德国引入患者自付费用对 IVF 和 ICSI 使用的影响:需求价格弹性评估。
Hum Reprod. 2009 Nov;24(11):2796-800. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep260. Epub 2009 Jul 22.
8
The economic impact of assisted reproductive technology: a review of selected developed countries.辅助生殖技术的经济影响:对部分发达国家的综述。
Fertil Steril. 2009 Jun;91(6):2281-94. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.04.029.
9
Assessing long-run economic benefits attributed to an IVF-conceived singleton based on projected lifetime net tax contributions in the UK.基于英国预计的终身净纳税贡献评估体外受精(IVF)孕育的单胎婴儿带来的长期经济效益。
Hum Reprod. 2009 Mar;24(3):626-32. doi: 10.1093/humrep/den435. Epub 2008 Dec 4.
10
Insurance mandates and trends in infertility treatments.保险授权与不孕症治疗趋势。
Fertil Steril. 2008 Jan;89(1):66-73. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.01.167. Epub 2007 May 7.