Sundaram V, Lazzeroni L C, Douglass L R, Sanders G D, Tempio P, Owens D K
VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Int J STD AIDS. 2009 Aug;20(8):527-33. doi: 10.1258/ijsa.2008.008423.
Despite recommendations for voluntary HIV screening, few medical centres have implemented screening programmes. The objective of the study was to determine whether an intervention with computer-based reminders and feedback would increase screening for HIV in a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) health-care system. The design of the study was a randomized controlled trial at five primary care clinics at the VA Palo Alto Health Care System. All primary care providers were eligible to participate in the study. The study intervention was computer-based reminders to either assess HIV risk behaviours or to offer HIV testing; feedback on adherence to reminders was provided. The main outcome measure was the difference in HIV testing rates between intervention and control group providers. The control group providers tested 1.0% (n = 67) and 1.4% (n = 106) of patients in the preintervention and intervention period, respectively; intervention providers tested 1.8% (n = 98) and 1.9% (n = 114), respectively (P = 0.75). In our random sample of 753 untested patients, 204 (27%) had documented risk behaviours. Providers were more likely to adhere to reminders to test rather than with reminders to perform risk assessment (11% versus 5%, P < 0.01). Sixty-one percent of providers felt that lack of time prevented risk assessment. In conclusion, in primary care clinics in our setting, HIV testing rates were low. Providers were unaware of the high rates of risky behaviour in their patient population and perceived important barriers to testing. Low-intensity clinical reminders and feedback did not increase rates of screening.
尽管有关于自愿进行HIV筛查的建议,但很少有医疗中心实施筛查项目。本研究的目的是确定基于计算机的提醒和反馈干预措施是否会增加退伍军人事务部(VA)医疗系统中HIV的筛查。该研究的设计是在VA帕洛阿尔托医疗系统的五个初级保健诊所进行的随机对照试验。所有初级保健提供者都有资格参与该研究。研究干预措施是基于计算机的提醒,要么评估HIV风险行为,要么提供HIV检测;同时提供关于遵守提醒情况的反馈。主要结局指标是干预组和对照组提供者之间HIV检测率的差异。对照组提供者在干预前和干预期间分别对1.0%(n = 67)和1.4%(n = 106)的患者进行了检测;干预组提供者分别对1.8%(n = 98)和1.9%(n = 114)的患者进行了检测(P = 0.75)。在我们随机抽取的753名未接受检测的患者样本中,204名(27%)有记录在案的风险行为。提供者更有可能遵守检测提醒,而不是进行风险评估的提醒(11%对5%,P < 0.01)。61%的提供者认为时间不足阻碍了风险评估。总之,在我们所在地区的初级保健诊所中,HIV检测率较低。提供者没有意识到其患者群体中高风险行为的发生率,并且察觉到了检测的重要障碍。低强度的临床提醒和反馈并没有提高筛查率。