• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The selection of high-impact health informatics literature: a comparison of results between the content expert and the expert searcher.高影响力健康信息学文献的选择:内容专家与专业检索者结果的比较
J Med Libr Assoc. 2009 Jul;97(3):212-8. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.97.3.010.
2
Impact Factors and Prediction of Popular Topics in a Journal.期刊中热门话题的影响因素及预测
Ultraschall Med. 2016 Aug;37(4):343-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-111209. Epub 2016 Aug 4.
3
A preliminary analysis of the dental informatics literature.
Adv Dent Res. 2003 Dec;17:20-4. doi: 10.1177/154407370301700106.
4
Novel citation-based search method for scientific literature: a validation study.基于引文的科学文献新型检索方法:一项验证研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Feb 7;20(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-0907-5.
5
Automatic evidence retrieval for systematic reviews.系统评价的自动证据检索
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Oct 1;16(10):e223. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3369.
6
The Top 100 Articles in the Medical Informatics: a Bibliometric Analysis.医学信息学领域的100篇顶尖文章:文献计量分析
J Med Syst. 2017 Aug 19;41(10):150. doi: 10.1007/s10916-017-0794-4.
7
Using Citation Context to Improve the Retrieval of Research Article from Cancer Research Journals.利用引用上下文改进从癌症研究期刊中检索研究文章。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2019 Mar 26;20(3):951-960. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.3.951.
8
10 years experience with pioneering open access publishing in health informatics: the Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR).在健康信息学领域开创开放获取出版模式的十年经验:《医学互联网研究杂志》(JMIR)。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2010;160(Pt 2):1329-33.
9
An Analysis of Altmetrics in Emergency Medicine.急诊医学中的替代计量学分析
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Mar;23(3):251-68. doi: 10.1111/acem.12898. Epub 2016 Feb 29.
10
Linking health information technology to patient safety and quality outcomes: a bibliometric analysis and review.将健康信息技术与患者安全和质量结果联系起来:文献计量分析和综述。
Inform Health Soc Care. 2013 Jan;38(1):1-14. doi: 10.3109/17538157.2012.678451. Epub 2012 Jun 1.

本文引用的文献

1
The landscape of the AHRQ Health Information Technology Portfolio.美国医疗保健研究与质量局(AHRQ)卫生信息技术项目概况。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2006;2006:912.
2
An evolution of experts: MEDLINE in the library school.专家的演变:图书馆学院中的医学文献数据库(MEDLINE)
J Med Libr Assoc. 2005 Jan;93(1):53-60.
3
A national profile of patient safety in U.S. hospitals.美国医院患者安全的全国概况。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2003 Mar-Apr;22(2):154-66. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.22.2.154.
4
Three decades of research on computer applications in health care: medical informatics support at the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.三十年医疗保健领域计算机应用研究:医疗保健研究与质量局的医学信息学支持
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2002 Mar-Apr;9(2):144-60. doi: 10.1197/jamia.m0867.
5
1966 and all that-when is a literature search done?1966年以及诸如此类的事情——文献检索何时进行?
Lancet. 2001 Aug 25;358(9282):646. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05826-3.
6
The informationist: a new health profession?信息专家:一种新兴的健康职业?
Ann Intern Med. 2000 Jun 20;132(12):996-8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-132-12-200006200-00012.
7
How good are clinical MEDLINE searches? A comparative study of clinical end-user and librarian searches.临床MEDLINE检索的效果如何?临床终端用户与图书馆员检索的比较研究。
Comput Biomed Res. 1990 Dec;23(6):583-93. doi: 10.1016/0010-4809(90)90042-b.

高影响力健康信息学文献的选择:内容专家与专业检索者结果的比较

The selection of high-impact health informatics literature: a comparison of results between the content expert and the expert searcher.

作者信息

Whipple Elizabeth C, McGowan Julie J, Dixon Brian E, Zafar Atif

机构信息

Ruth Lilly Medical Library, Indiana University School of Medicine, 975 West Walnut Street, IB-310, Indianapolis, IN 46202-512, USA.

出版信息

J Med Libr Assoc. 2009 Jul;97(3):212-8. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.97.3.010.

DOI:10.3163/1536-5050.97.3.010
PMID:19626147
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2706443/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) National Resource Center for Health Information Technology (NRC) created the Health IT Bibliography that contains peer-reviewed articles in eleven different health informatics categories. To create the bibliography, informatics experts identified what they considered the seminal articles in each category.

METHODS

Using the same eleven categories, an expert searcher (librarian) compiled a list of the "best" health informatics articles using information seeking and retrieval tools. The two sets of articles were then compared using high citation counts as a measure of value.

RESULTS

The expert searcher set (8,230) contained more than 3 times the citations to chosen articles compared to the content expert set (2,382). Of 60 articles, 27% of those articles (n = 16) were included in both sets. The frequently cited journals were similar for both sets, and one-third of the same authors were cited in both sets.

DISCUSSION

While citation counts and the timeliness of the articles differed in the two sets, the same authors and same journals were frequently present in both sets.

CONCLUSION

A best practice for locating high-quality articles may be collaboration between expert searchers and content experts.

摘要

背景

医疗保健研究与质量局(AHRQ)的国家卫生信息技术资源中心(NRC)创建了健康信息技术文献目录,其中包含11个不同健康信息学类别的同行评审文章。为了创建该文献目录,信息学专家确定了他们认为每个类别中的开创性文章。

方法

使用相同的11个类别,一位专家检索者(图书管理员)使用信息搜索和检索工具编制了一份“最佳”健康信息学文章列表。然后,以高引用次数作为价值衡量标准,对这两组文章进行比较。

结果

与内容专家组(2382次)相比,专家检索者组(8230次)对所选文章的引用次数多出3倍以上。在60篇文章中,27%(n = 16)的文章同时包含在两组中。两组中经常被引用的期刊相似,两组中都有三分之一的相同作者被引用。

讨论

虽然两组文章的引用次数和时效性有所不同,但两组中经常出现相同的作者和期刊。

结论

寻找高质量文章的最佳做法可能是专家检索者和内容专家之间的合作。