• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根治性前列腺切除术网站上的性健康信息分析。

An analysis of sexual health information on radical prostatectomy websites.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

BJU Int. 2010 Jan;105(1):68-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08762.x. Epub 2009 Jul 20.

DOI:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08762.x
PMID:19627282
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To define the nature of information posted on websites related to radical prostatectomy (RP), specifically its accuracy and comprehensiveness, as RP is associated with erectile dysfunction (ED).

METHODS

We reviewed 70 robotic RP (RARP) and 20 open RP (ORP) medical centres. Their websites were reviewed for various factors, by two separate reviewers whose reviews were not seen by each other. Websites were graded based on accuracy and comprehensiveness of information by the senior investigator.

RESULTS

Of the academic and community-based RARP centres, 55% and 79% had specific websites (P < 0.05); 45% of RARP sites had generic information copied directly from the website of Intuitive Surgical (Sunnyvale, CA, USA; the manufacturer of the robotic system). ED was mentioned by only 54% of RARP sites and 45% of ORP sites; 17% of RARP sites were deemed accurate, compared with 30% of ORP sites (P < 0.05). Just over 1% of RARP sites were considered comprehensive, vs 10% of ORP sites (P < 0.05). A third of RARP sites had a direct link to the Intuitive Surgical website (16% academic vs 53% community, P < 0.05), compared to 10% of open sites (P < 0.05). Of most interest was that half of the RARP sites suggested that ED rates were lower for RARP than for ORP; this compared to ED rates being cited as lower for ORP on 5% of the ORP sites (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the stature of RP as a treatment option for men with prostate cancer, and the recent increase in the use of RARP, the accuracy of information pertaining to sexual health on RP websites is poor, with many making false statements about the long-term outcomes for erectile function. This inadequacy appears to be greater on RARP than on ORP websites.

摘要

目的

确定与根治性前列腺切除术(RP)相关的网站上发布的信息的性质,特别是其准确性和全面性,因为 RP 与勃起功能障碍(ED)有关。

方法

我们回顾了 70 例机器人辅助 RP(RARP)和 20 例开放式 RP(ORP)医疗中心。由两名独立的审查员对其网站进行了各种因素的审查,彼此之间没有看到对方的审查结果。网站的评分是由高级研究员根据信息的准确性和全面性进行的。

结果

在学术和社区 RARP 中心中,有 55%和 79%的中心有专门的网站(P < 0.05);45%的 RARP 网站的信息是直接从机器人系统制造商直觉外科公司(加利福尼亚州森尼韦尔)的网站复制而来的。只有 54%的 RARP 网站和 45%的 ORP 网站提到了 ED;17%的 RARP 网站被认为是准确的,而 30%的 ORP 网站是准确的(P < 0.05)。只有略多于 1%的 RARP 网站被认为是全面的,而 10%的 ORP 网站是全面的(P < 0.05)。三分之一的 RARP 网站有一个指向直觉外科公司网站的直接链接(学术网站为 16%,社区网站为 53%,P < 0.05),而开放网站为 10%(P < 0.05)。最有趣的是,一半的 RARP 网站表明 RARP 的 ED 发生率低于 ORP;而 ORP 网站中只有 5%提到 ORP 的 ED 发生率较低(P < 0.05)。

结论

尽管 RP 作为一种治疗前列腺癌男性的治疗选择具有重要地位,而且最近 RARP 的使用有所增加,但与 RP 网站上的性健康相关的信息准确性很差,许多网站对勃起功能的长期结果做出了错误的陈述。这种不足在 RARP 网站上似乎比在 ORP 网站上更为明显。

相似文献

1
An analysis of sexual health information on radical prostatectomy websites.根治性前列腺切除术网站上的性健康信息分析。
BJU Int. 2010 Jan;105(1):68-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08762.x. Epub 2009 Jul 20.
2
Consumerism and its impact on robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.消费主义及其对机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的影响。
BJU Int. 2011 Dec;108(11):1874-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10117.x. Epub 2011 Jun 2.
3
Hospitalization costs for radical prostatectomy attributable to robotic surgery.机器人手术导致的根治性前列腺切除术的住院费用。
Eur Urol. 2013 Jul;64(1):11-6. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.08.012. Epub 2012 Aug 20.
4
Critical appraisal of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的批判性评估
Curr Opin Urol. 2009 May;19(3):290-6. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e328329a356.
5
Perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open radical prostatectomy: results from the nationwide inpatient sample.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术与开放性根治性前列腺切除术的围手术期结局比较:来自全国住院患者样本的结果。
Eur Urol. 2012 Apr;61(4):679-85. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.12.027. Epub 2011 Dec 22.
6
Community-based Outcomes of Open versus Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy.基于社区的开放式与机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的结果比较。
Eur Urol. 2018 Feb;73(2):215-223. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.04.027. Epub 2017 May 9.
7
Superior quality of life and improved surgical margins are achievable with robotic radical prostatectomy after a long learning curve: a prospective single-surgeon study of 1552 consecutive cases.通过长期的学习曲线,机器人根治性前列腺切除术可以实现更高的生活质量和更好的手术切缘:一项连续 1552 例的单外科医生前瞻性研究。
Eur Urol. 2014 Mar;65(3):521-31. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.10.030. Epub 2013 Oct 31.
8
Assessment of lymph node yield after pelvic lymph node dissection in men with prostate cancer: a comparison between robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and open radical prostatectomy in the modern era.评估前列腺癌患者行盆腔淋巴结清扫术后的淋巴结检出量:机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术与开放根治性前列腺切除术在现代的比较。
J Endourol. 2010 Jul;24(7):1055-60. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0128.
9
Patterns-of-care and health economic analysis of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in the Australian public health system.澳大利亚公共卫生系统中机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的护理模式与健康经济分析。
BJU Int. 2016 Jun;117(6):930-9. doi: 10.1111/bju.13317. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
10
Interval from prostate biopsy to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: effects on perioperative outcomes.从前列腺活检到机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的时间间隔:对围手术期结果的影响。
BJU Int. 2009 Dec;104(11):1734-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08685.x. Epub 2009 Jun 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Robotic Surgical System for Radical Prostatectomy: A Health Technology Assessment.用于根治性前列腺切除术的机器人手术系统:一项卫生技术评估。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2017 Jul 7;17(11):1-172. eCollection 2017.
2
Trends in internet search activity, media coverage, and patient-centered health information after the FDA safety communications on surgical mesh for pelvic organ prolapse.美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)发布关于盆腔器官脱垂手术网片的安全通讯后,互联网搜索活动、媒体报道及以患者为中心的健康信息趋势。
Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Nov;27(11):1761-1766. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-3040-6. Epub 2016 May 21.
3
Psychosocial perspectives on sexual recovery after prostate cancer treatment.
前列腺癌治疗后性功能康复的心理社会视角。
Nat Rev Urol. 2015 Mar;12(3):167-76. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2015.29. Epub 2015 Mar 10.
4
A single institution study on patient's self-reporting appraisal and functional outcomes of the first set of men following radical perineal prostatectomy.一项关于根治性会阴前列腺切除术后首批男性患者自我报告评估及功能结局的单机构研究。
Cent European J Urol. 2012;65(3):124-9. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2012.03.art5. Epub 2012 Sep 4.
5
Trends in immediate perioperative morbidity and delay in discharge after open and minimally invasive radical prostatectomy (RP): a 20-year institutional experience.开放和微创根治性前列腺切除术(RP)后即刻围手术期发病率和延迟出院的趋势:20 年的机构经验。
BJU Int. 2013 Jul;112(1):45-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11767.x.
6
Accuracy of marketing claims by providers of stereotactic radiation therapy.立体定向放射治疗提供者的营销宣传的准确性。
J Oncol Pract. 2013 Jan;9(1):57-62. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2012.000693.
7
Back to baseline: erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy from the patients' perspective.回到基线:从患者角度看根治性前列腺切除术后的勃起功能恢复。
J Sex Med. 2013 Jun;10(6):1636-43. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12135. Epub 2013 Apr 3.
8
Evaluation of patient-reported quality-of-life outcomes after renal surgery.评估肾手术后患者报告的生活质量结果。
Urology. 2012 Jun;79(6):1268-73. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.02.047. Epub 2012 Apr 28.
9
Direct-to-consumer Internet promotion of robotic prostatectomy exhibits varying quality of information.直接面向消费者的互联网宣传机器人前列腺切除术展示了不同质量的信息。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Apr;31(4):760-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0329.
10
[Diagnosis prostate cancer: who makes the treatment decision and which treatment is selected? Opinion survey in a prostate cancer patient support group].[前列腺癌的诊断:谁做出治疗决策以及选择哪种治疗方法?前列腺癌患者支持小组的意见调查]
Urologe A. 2012 Feb;51(2):238-41. doi: 10.1007/s00120-011-2725-1.