Thomas Susan Sienko, Buckon Cathleen E, Schwartz Michael H, Russman Barry S, Sussman Michael D, Aiona Michael D
Shriners Hospitals for Children, Portland, OR 97239, USA.
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2009 Aug;51(8):615-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2008.03214.x.
For individuals with neuromuscular disorders, the assessment of walking energy efficiency is useful as a clinical outcome measure. Issues surrounding data collection methodology, normalization of the data, and variability and clinical utility of energy efficiency data preclude universal application. This study examined the variability and the clinical utility of velocity, energy efficiency index (EEI), gross cost, and net nondimensional cost (NNcost) in children and adolescents with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy (CP) in Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels I to III. The energy efficiency of walking was evaluated in 23 children and adolescents (12 males, 11 females, mean age 11y 3mo [SD 3y 5mo]; range 7-17y). Day-to-day variability was similar for all energy efficiency variables, with no significant differences in magnitude of variability between GMFCS levels. Correlations between EEI and gross cost and EEI and NNcost were fairly good (r=0.65, p<0.001, and r=0.74, p<0.001 respectively). However, only gross cost and NNcost discriminated between GMFCS levels in children with CP. Gross cost required the greatest amount of change to be considered clinically significant, whereas NNcost and EEI required a similar amount of change. For cohorts of children with CP who are evaluated over time, NNcost is the best normalization method as it reduces the variability between participants of different ages, height, and weight while evaluating only the amount of energy used to ambulate.
对于患有神经肌肉疾病的个体,步行能量效率评估作为一项临床结局指标很有用。围绕数据收集方法、数据标准化以及能量效率数据的变异性和临床实用性等问题阻碍了其普遍应用。本研究调查了痉挛型双侧瘫脑瘫(CP)患儿和青少年(粗大运动功能分类系统(GMFCS)I至III级)的速度、能量效率指数(EEI)、总能耗和净无量纲成本(NNcost)的变异性及临床实用性。对23名儿童和青少年(12名男性,11名女性,平均年龄11岁3个月[标准差3岁5个月];范围7 - 17岁)的步行能量效率进行了评估。所有能量效率变量的日常变异性相似,GMFCS各等级之间的变异性大小无显著差异。EEI与总能耗以及EEI与NNcost之间的相关性相当好(分别为r = 0.65,p < 0.001和r = 0.74,p < 0.001)。然而,只有总能耗和NNcost能够区分CP患儿的GMFCS等级。总能耗需要最大的变化量才被认为具有临床意义,而NNcost和EEI需要的变化量相似。对于随时间进行评估的CP患儿队列,NNcost是最佳的标准化方法,因为它在评估仅用于行走的能量量时,减少了不同年龄、身高和体重参与者之间的变异性。