对于远端胆管癌,肿瘤浸润深度比目前美国癌症联合委员会的T分类能更好地预测预后。

Depth of tumor invasion better predicts prognosis than the current American Joint Committee on Cancer T classification for distal bile duct carcinoma.

作者信息

Hong Seung-Mo, Pawlik Timothy M, Cho Hyungjun, Aggarwal Bhuvnesh, Goggins Michael, Hruban Ralph H, Anders Robert A

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA.

出版信息

Surgery. 2009 Aug;146(2):250-7. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.02.023.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) T classification system for cholangiocarcinoma does not take into account the unique pathologic features of the bile duct. As such, the current AJCC T classification for distal cholangiocarcinoma may be inaccurate.

METHODS

A total of 147 patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma were identified from a single institution database. The prognostic importance of depth of tumor invasion relative to the AJCC T classification system was assessed.

RESULTS

The AJCC T classification was T1 (n = 11, 7.5%), T2 (n = 6, 4.1%), T3 (n = 73, 49.7%), or T4 (n = 57, 38.8%). When cases were analyzed according to depth of tumor invasion, most lesions were > or =5 mm (<5 mm, 9.5%; range, 5-12, 51.0%; >12 mm, 39.5%). The AJCC T classification was not associated with survival outcome (median survival, T1, 40.1 months; T2, 14.8 months; T3, 16.5 months; T4, 20.2 months; P = .17). In contrast, depth of tumor invasion was associated with a worse outcome as tumor depth increased (median survival, <5 mm, not reached; range, 5-12, 28.9 months; >12 mm, 12.9 months; P = .001). On multivariate analyses, tumor depth remained the factor most associated with outcome (<5 mm; hazard ratio [HR] = referent vs 5-12 mm; HR = 3.8 vs >12 mm; HR = 6.7 mm; P = .001).

CONCLUSION

The AJCC T classification for distal cholangiocarcinoma does not accurately predict prognosis. Depth of the bile duct carcinoma invasion is a better alternative method to determine prognosis and should be incorporated into the pathologic assessment of resected distal cholangiocarcinoma.

摘要

背景

美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)的胆管癌T分类系统未考虑胆管独特的病理特征。因此,目前AJCC对远端胆管癌的T分类可能不准确。

方法

从单一机构数据库中识别出147例远端胆管癌患者。评估相对于AJCC T分类系统而言肿瘤浸润深度的预后重要性。

结果

AJCC T分类为T1(n = 11,7.5%)、T2(n = 6,4.1%)、T3(n = 73,49.7%)或T4(n = 57,38.8%)。根据肿瘤浸润深度分析病例时,大多数病变≥5mm(<5mm,9.5%;范围5 - 12mm,51.0%;>12mm,39.5%)。AJCC T分类与生存结果无关(中位生存期,T1为40.1个月;T2为14.8个月;T3为16.5个月;T4为20.2个月;P = 0.17)。相比之下,随着肿瘤深度增加,肿瘤浸润深度与更差的结果相关(中位生存期:<5mm,未达到;范围5 - 12mm,28.9个月;>12mm,12.9个月;P = 0.001)。多因素分析显示,肿瘤深度仍然是与结果最相关的因素(<5mm;风险比[HR] = 参照值 vs 5 - 12mm;HR = 3.8 vs >12mm;HR = 6.7;P = 0.001)。

结论

AJCC对远端胆管癌的T分类不能准确预测预后。胆管癌浸润深度是确定预后的更好替代方法,应纳入切除的远端胆管癌的病理评估中。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索