文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

第八版美国癌症联合委员会胆管癌分期系统的验证。

Validation of the Eighth American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System for Distal Bile Duct Carcinoma.

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Incheon, Korea.

Department of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Jan;51(1):98-111. doi: 10.4143/crt.2017.595. Epub 2018 Mar 2.


DOI:10.4143/crt.2017.595
PMID:29510611
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6333967/
Abstract

PURPOSE: T category of the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for distal bile duct carcinoma (DBDC) was changed to include tumor invasion depth measurement, while the N category adopted a 3-tier classification system based on the number of metastatic nodes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To validate cancer staging, a total of 200 surgically resected DBDCs were staged and compared according to the seventh and eighth editions. RESULTS: T categories included T1 (n=37, 18.5%), T2 (n=114, 57.0%), and T3 (n=49, 24.5%). N categories included N0 (n=133, 66.5%), N1 (n=50, 25.0%), and N2 (n=17, 8.5%). Stage groupings included I (n=33, 16.5%), II (n=150, 75.0%), and III (n=17, 8.5%). The overall 5-year survival rates (5-YSRs) of T1, T2, and T3 were 59.3%, 42.4%, and 12.2%, respectively. T category could discriminate patient survival by both pairwise (T1 and T2, p=0.011; T2 and T3, p < 0.001) and overall (p < 0.001) comparisons. The overall 5-YSRs of N0, N1, and N2 were 47.3%, 17.0%, and 14.7%, respectively. N category could partly discriminate patient survival by both pairwise (N0 and N1, p < 0.001; N1 and N2, p=0.579) and overall (p < 0.001) comparisons. The overall 5-YSRs of stages I, II, and III were 59.0%, 35.4%, and 14.7%, respectively. Stages could distinguish patient survival by both pairwise (I and II, p=0.002; II and III, p=0.015) and overall (p < 0.001) comparisons. On multivariate analyses, T and N categories (p=0.014 and p=0.029) and pancreatic invasion (p=0.006) remained significant prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: The T andNcategories of the eighth edition AJCC staging system for DBDC accurately predict patient prognosis.

摘要

目的:第八版美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)远端胆管癌(DBDC)分期系统的 T 分期类别改为包括肿瘤侵袭深度测量,而 N 分期采用基于转移淋巴结数量的 3 级分类系统。

材料与方法:为了验证癌症分期,对 200 例手术切除的 DBDC 进行分期,并根据第七版和第八版进行比较。

结果:T 分期包括 T1(n=37,18.5%)、T2(n=114,57.0%)和 T3(n=49,24.5%)。N 分期包括 N0(n=133,66.5%)、N1(n=50,25.0%)和 N2(n=17,8.5%)。分期组包括 I(n=33,16.5%)、II(n=150,75.0%)和 III(n=17,8.5%)。T1、T2 和 T3 的总 5 年生存率(5-YSR)分别为 59.3%、42.4%和 12.2%。T 分期可以通过两两比较(T1 和 T2,p=0.011;T2 和 T3,p<0.001)和整体比较(p<0.001)来区分患者的生存情况。N0、N1 和 N2 的总 5-YSR 分别为 47.3%、17.0%和 14.7%。N 分期可以通过两两比较(N0 和 N1,p<0.001;N1 和 N2,p=0.579)和整体比较(p<0.001)来部分区分患者的生存情况。I、II 和 III 期的总 5-YSR 分别为 59.0%、35.4%和 14.7%。分期可以通过两两比较(I 和 II,p=0.002;II 和 III,p=0.015)和整体比较(p<0.001)来区分患者的生存情况。多因素分析显示,T 分期和 N 分期(p=0.014 和 p=0.029)和胰腺侵犯(p=0.006)仍然是重要的预后因素。

结论:第八版 AJCC 远端胆管癌分期系统的 T 和 N 分期能够准确预测患者的预后。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e70/6333967/41e574b83f6c/crt-2017-595f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e70/6333967/6563463e6eca/crt-2017-595f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e70/6333967/c9ccaea2227d/crt-2017-595f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e70/6333967/1fba8871d76d/crt-2017-595f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e70/6333967/00e3ebb3547a/crt-2017-595f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e70/6333967/41e574b83f6c/crt-2017-595f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e70/6333967/6563463e6eca/crt-2017-595f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e70/6333967/c9ccaea2227d/crt-2017-595f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e70/6333967/1fba8871d76d/crt-2017-595f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e70/6333967/00e3ebb3547a/crt-2017-595f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e70/6333967/41e574b83f6c/crt-2017-595f5.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Validation of the Eighth American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System for Distal Bile Duct Carcinoma.

Cancer Res Treat. 2018-3-2

[2]
Prognostic predictability of the new American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th staging system for distal bile duct cancer: limited usefulness compared with the 7th staging system.

J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2017-12-14

[3]
Depth of tumor invasion better predicts prognosis than the current American Joint Committee on Cancer T classification for distal bile duct carcinoma.

Surgery. 2009-8

[4]
International Validation of the Eighth Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM Staging System in Patients With Resected Pancreatic Cancer.

JAMA Surg. 2018-12-19

[5]
The evaluation of the 8th and 7th edition of the American joint committee on cancer tumor classification for distal cholangiocarcinoma: the proposal of a modified new tumor classification.

HPB (Oxford). 2021-8

[6]
Comparative performances of the 7th and the 8th editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging systems for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

J Surg Oncol. 2017-5

[7]
Validation of T Stage According to Depth of Invasion and N Stage Subclassification Based on Number of Metastatic Lymph Nodes for Distal Extrahepatic Bile Duct (EBD) Carcinoma.

Medicine (Baltimore). 2015-12

[8]
Validation of the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for ampulla of Vater cancer.

Surgery. 2018-2-13

[9]
Proposal for a new T-stage classification system for distal cholangiocarcinoma: a 10-institution study from the U.S. Extrahepatic Biliary Malignancy Consortium.

HPB (Oxford). 2016-10

[10]
Prognostic Predictability of American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th Staging System for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: Limited Improvement Compared with the 7th Staging System.

Cancer Res Treat. 2020-7

引用本文的文献

[1]
Clinical impact of pancreatic invasion in T1-stage distal bile duct cancer and prognostic factors associated with long-term survival: A multicenter study.

J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2024-9

[2]
Effect of MELD-Na score on overall survival of periampullary cancer.

Updates Surg. 2024-9

[3]
The prognostic value of the number of metastatic lymph nodes on the long-term survival of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma using the SEER database.

J Gastrointest Oncol. 2023-12-31

[4]
Proposal for a new N-stage classification system for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Front Oncol. 2023-8-11

[5]
Retrospective analysis of 8th edition American Joint Cancer Classification: Distal cholangiocarcinoma.

Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2023-8-31

[6]
Prognostic significance of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in predicting outcome of distal cholangiocarcinoma in Thailand.

Front Oncol. 2022-12-13

[7]
The consistencies and inconsistencies between distal cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Front Oncol. 2022-12-12

[8]
Metachronous pancreatic cancer 18 years after resection of common bile duct cancer: A case report.

Front Surg. 2022-8-24

[9]
Prognostic Significance of Growth Pattern in Predicting Outcome of -Associated Distal Cholangiocarcinoma in Thailand.

Front Public Health. 2022-5-16

[10]
Surgical management of biliary malignancy.

Curr Probl Surg. 2021-2

本文引用的文献

[1]
Prognostic predictability of the new American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th staging system for distal bile duct cancer: limited usefulness compared with the 7th staging system.

J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2017-12-14

[2]
Intrapancreatic distal common bile duct carcinoma: Analysis, staging considerations, and comparison with pancreatic ductal and ampullary adenocarcinomas.

Mod Pathol. 2016-11

[3]
Validation of T Stage According to Depth of Invasion and N Stage Subclassification Based on Number of Metastatic Lymph Nodes for Distal Extrahepatic Bile Duct (EBD) Carcinoma.

Medicine (Baltimore). 2015-12

[4]
Prognostic impact of lymph node metastasis in distal cholangiocarcinoma.

Br J Surg. 2015-1-22

[5]
Cancer statistics, 2015.

CA Cancer J Clin. 2015-1-5

[6]
Comparison of incidence of intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma--focus on East and South-Eastern Asia.

Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2010

[7]
Depth of tumor invasion better predicts prognosis than the current American Joint Committee on Cancer T classification for distal bile duct carcinoma.

Surgery. 2009-8

[8]
Lymph node dissection impact on staging and survival of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas, based on U.S. population data.

J Gastrointest Surg. 2007-2

[9]
Measurement of the invasion depth of extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma: An alternative method overcoming the current T classification problems of the AJCC staging system.

Am J Surg Pathol. 2007-2

[10]
Reconsideration of the histologic definitions used in the pathologic staging of extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma.

Am J Surg Pathol. 2006-6

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索