• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

弗洛勒斯人:系统发生分析。

Homo floresiensis: a cladistic analysis.

机构信息

Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.

出版信息

J Hum Evol. 2009 Nov;57(5):623-39. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2009.05.002. Epub 2009 Jul 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.jhevol.2009.05.002
PMID:19628252
Abstract

The announcement of a new species, Homo floresiensis, a primitive hominin that survived until relatively recent times is an enormous challenge to paradigms of human evolution. Until this announcement, the dominant paradigm stipulated that: 1) only more derived hominins had emerged from Africa, and 2) H. sapiens was the only hominin since the demise of Homo erectus and Homo neanderthalensis. Resistance to H. floresiensis has been intense, and debate centers on two sets of competing hypotheses: 1) that it is a primitive hominin, and 2) that it is a modern human, either a pygmoid form or a pathological individual. Despite a range of analytical techniques having been applied to the question, no resolution has been reached. Here, we use cladistic analysis, a tool that has not, until now, been applied to the problem, to establish the phylogenetic position of the species. Our results produce two equally parsimonious phylogenetic trees. The first suggests that H. floresiensis is an early hominin that emerged after Homo rudolfensis (1.86Ma) but before H. habilis (1.66Ma, or after 1.9Ma if the earlier chronology for H. habilis is retained). The second tree indicates H. floresiensis branched after Homo habilis.

摘要

宣布一个新物种,弗洛瑞斯人,一个生存到相对较近时期的原始原始人,这对人类进化的范例构成了巨大的挑战。在此之前,主导的范例规定:1)只有更衍生的原始人从非洲出现,2)智人是自直立人和尼安德特人灭绝以来唯一的原始人。对弗洛瑞斯人的抵制非常强烈,争论集中在两套相互竞争的假设上:1)它是一种原始原始人,2)它是现代人,要么是矮小的形式,要么是病态的个体。尽管已经应用了一系列分析技术来解决这个问题,但仍未得出结论。在这里,我们使用分支分析,这是一种直到现在才应用于该问题的工具,来确定物种的系统发育位置。我们的结果产生了两个同样简约的系统发育树。第一个表明,弗洛瑞斯人是一种早期的原始人,它出现在鲁道夫原始人(1.86Ma)之后,但在能人(1.66Ma)之前(如果保留能人更早的年代,则在 1.9Ma 之后)。第二棵树表明,弗洛瑞斯人在能人之后分支。

相似文献

1
Homo floresiensis: a cladistic analysis.弗洛勒斯人:系统发生分析。
J Hum Evol. 2009 Nov;57(5):623-39. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2009.05.002. Epub 2009 Jul 23.
2
Five years of Homo floresiensis.弗洛里斯人生活的五年
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2010 Jun;142(2):167-79. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.21255.
3
Homo floresiensis: microcephalic, pygmoid, Australopithecus, or Homo?弗洛勒斯人:小头畸形、类侏儒、南方古猿还是人属?
J Hum Evol. 2006 Oct;51(4):360-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2006.04.013. Epub 2006 Jul 5.
4
The affinities of Homo floresiensis based on phylogenetic analyses of cranial, dental, and postcranial characters.基于对颅骨、牙齿和后肢骨骼特征的系统发育分析,弗洛勒斯人(Homo floresiensis)的亲缘关系。
J Hum Evol. 2017 Jun;107:107-133. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2017.02.006. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
5
Cladistic analysis of early Homo crania from Swartkrans and Sterkfontein, South Africa.对来自南非斯瓦特克朗斯和斯特克方丹的早期人属颅骨进行支序分析。
J Hum Evol. 2008 May;54(5):684-704. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2007.10.012. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
6
Liang Bua Homo floresiensis mandibles and mandibular teeth: a contribution to the comparative morphology of a new hominin species.梁布亚弗洛里斯人下颌骨和下颌牙齿:对一个新人种比较形态学的贡献。
J Hum Evol. 2009 Nov;57(5):571-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2009.06.002. Epub 2009 Jul 8.
7
The primitive wrist of Homo floresiensis and its implications for hominin evolution.弗洛勒斯人原始的腕部及其对古人类进化的意义。
Science. 2007 Sep 21;317(5845):1743-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1147143.
8
A new small-bodied hominin from the Late Pleistocene of Flores, Indonesia.来自印度尼西亚弗洛雷斯晚更新世的一种新的小型人科动物。
Nature. 2004 Oct 28;431(7012):1055-61. doi: 10.1038/nature02999.
9
Conclusions: implications of the Liang Bua excavations for hominin evolution and biogeography.结论:梁布亚发掘对人类进化和生物地理学的影响。
J Hum Evol. 2009 Nov;57(5):640-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2009.08.003.
10
Craniofacial morphology of Homo floresiensis: description, taxonomic affinities, and evolutionary implication.弗洛勒斯人颅面形态学:描述、分类亲缘关系及其进化意义。
J Hum Evol. 2011 Dec;61(6):644-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2011.08.008. Epub 2011 Oct 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Massive cranium from Harbin in northeastern China establishes a new Middle Pleistocene human lineage.来自中国东北哈尔滨的巨大颅骨确立了一个新的中更新世人类谱系。
Innovation (Camb). 2021 Aug 28;2(3):100130. doi: 10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100130.
2
Divergence-time estimates for hominins provide insight into encephalization and body mass trends in human evolution.人科的分歧时间估计为理解人类进化中大脑化和体质量趋势提供了线索。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2021 Jun;5(6):808-819. doi: 10.1038/s41559-021-01431-1. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
3
Evolutionary development of the Homo antecessor scapulae (Gran Dolina site, Atapuerca) suggests a modern-like development for Lower Pleistocene Homo.
先驱人肩胛骨的进化发展(格兰多利纳遗址,阿塔普尔卡)表明下更新世的人类具有现代人类一样的发展模式。
Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 18;11(1):4102. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-83039-w.
4
New fossil remains of from the Lesedi Chamber, South Africa.来自南非莱塞迪腔室的新化石残骸。 (你提供的原文“New fossil remains of from the Lesedi Chamber, South Africa.”表述不完整,这里是补齐可能缺失部分后的翻译。)
Elife. 2017 May 9;6:e24232. doi: 10.7554/eLife.24232.
5
A Critical Evaluation of the Down Syndrome Diagnosis for LB1, Type Specimen of Homo floresiensis.对弗洛勒斯人类型标本LB1唐氏综合征诊断的批判性评估。
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 8;11(6):e0155731. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155731. eCollection 2016.
6
A Hominin Femur with Archaic Affinities from the Late Pleistocene of Southwest China.来自中国西南部晚更新世的具有古老亲缘关系的人科股骨。
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 17;10(12):e0143332. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143332. eCollection 2015.
7
Unique Dental Morphology of Homo floresiensis and Its Evolutionary Implications.弗洛勒斯人独特的牙齿形态及其进化意义。
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 18;10(11):e0141614. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141614. eCollection 2015.
8
Bayesian analysis of a morphological supermatrix sheds light on controversial fossil hominin relationships.对形态学超矩阵的贝叶斯分析揭示了有争议的化石人族关系。
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Aug 7;282(1812):20150943. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2015.0943.
9
'Captivity bias' in animal tool use and its implications for the evolution of hominin technology.动物工具使用中的“囚禁偏差”及其对人属技术进化的影响。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013 Oct 7;368(1630):20120421. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0421. Print 2013 Nov 19.
10
Homo floresiensis contextualized: a geometric morphometric comparative analysis of fossil and pathological human samples.弗洛勒斯人背景化:化石和病理性人类样本的几何形态计量比较分析。
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 10;8(7):e69119. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069119. Print 2013.