Yu Teng-Jen, Liu Yu-Chih, Yu Chung-Chieh, Tseng Jo-Chi, Hua Chung-Ching, Wu Huang-Pin
Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine & Department of Respiratory Therapy, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Adv Ther. 2009 Jul;26(7):728-35. doi: 10.1007/s12325-009-0043-4. Epub 2009 Jul 23.
Intravenous hydrocortisone of 200-300 mg/day for 7 days is suggested for patients with septic shock who require vasopressors to maintain mean artery pressure >or=65 mmHg, despite adequate fluid resuscitation. No study to date has compared the effects between physiologic doses of hydrocortisone and methylprednisolone in patients with septic shock.
From July 2007 to June 2008, patients who were admitted to the intensive care unit at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung, Taiwan, with low-dose steroid therapy due to septic shock were enrolled in this study. The typical steroid therapy included 7 days of intravenous hydrocortisone 50 mg every 6 hours. Methylprednisolone (20 mg every 12 hours) was replaced in these patients from January 2008 because no hydrocortisone could be prescribed.
A total of 21 patients were prescribed hydrocortisone and 19 patients were prescribed methylprednisolone. The survival rates for patients receiving hydrocortisone were relatively higher compared with those receiving methylprednisolone, but the difference was not significant. There were no significant differences in the Kaplan-Meier curves for the time to reverse shock between patients who received hydrocortisone, or methylprednisolone. Further regression analysis showed no significant independent factors associated with the survival rates and the time to reverse shock among age, sex, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score, histories, and adverse events.
Low-dose methylprednisolone and hydrocortisone might have a similar effect for the treatment of patients with septic shock.
对于尽管进行了充分的液体复苏,但仍需要血管加压药来维持平均动脉压≥65 mmHg的感染性休克患者,建议静脉注射氢化可的松200 - 300 mg/天,持续7天。迄今为止,尚无研究比较生理剂量的氢化可的松和甲泼尼龙对感染性休克患者的影响。
从2007年7月至2008年6月,入住台湾基隆长庚纪念医院重症监护病房、因感染性休克接受低剂量类固醇治疗的患者纳入本研究。典型的类固醇治疗包括静脉注射氢化可的松50 mg,每6小时一次,持续7天。从2008年1月起,这些患者改用甲泼尼龙(每12小时20 mg),因为无法开具氢化可的松。
共有21例患者使用氢化可的松,19例患者使用甲泼尼龙。接受氢化可的松治疗的患者生存率相对高于接受甲泼尼龙治疗的患者,但差异无统计学意义。接受氢化可的松或甲泼尼龙治疗的患者在休克逆转时间的Kaplan-Meier曲线无显著差异。进一步的回归分析显示,在年龄、性别、急性生理与慢性健康状况评分II(APACHE II)、病史和不良事件等方面,没有与生存率和休克逆转时间相关的显著独立因素。
低剂量甲泼尼龙和氢化可的松对感染性休克患者的治疗效果可能相似。