Suppr超能文献

氢化可的松给药方式对感染性休克患者血糖控制的影响:一项前瞻性随机试验。

Effect of mode of hydrocortisone administration on glycemic control in patients with septic shock: a prospective randomized trial.

作者信息

Loisa Pekka, Parviainen Ilkka, Tenhunen Jyrki, Hovilehto Seppo, Ruokonen Esko

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care, Päijät-Häme Central Hospital, Keskussairaalankatu 7, Lahti, Finland.

出版信息

Crit Care. 2007;11(1):R21. doi: 10.1186/cc5696.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Low-dose hydrocortisone treatment is widely accepted therapy for the treatment of vasopressor-dependent septic shock. The question of whether corticosteroids should be given to septic shock patients by continuous or by bolus infusion is still unanswered. Hydrocortisone induces hyperglycemia and it is possible that continuous hydrocortisone infusion would reduce the fluctuations in blood glucose levels and that tight blood glucose control could be better achieved with this approach.

METHODS

In this prospective randomized study, we compared the blood glucose profiles, insulin requirements, amount of nursing workload needed, and shock reversal in 48 septic shock patients who received hydrocortisone treatment either by bolus or by continuous infusion with equivalent dose (200 mg/day). Duration of hydrocortisone treatment was five days.

RESULTS

The mean blood glucose levels were similar in the two groups, but the number of hyperglycemic episodes was significantly higher in those patients who received bolus therapy (15.7 +/- 8.5 versus 10.5 +/- 8.6 episodes per patient, p = 0.039). Also, more changes in insulin infusion rate were needed to maintain strict normoglycemia in the bolus group (4.7 +/- 2.2 versus 3.4 +/- 1.9 adjustments per patient per day, p = 0.038). Hypoglycemic episodes were rare in both groups. No difference was seen in shock reversal.

CONCLUSION

Strict normoglycemia is more easily achieved if the hydrocortisone therapy is given to septic shock patients by continuous infusion. This approach also reduces nursing workload needed to maintain tight blood glucose control.

摘要

引言

小剂量氢化可的松治疗是治疗依赖血管升压药的感染性休克被广泛接受的疗法。对于感染性休克患者,皮质类固醇应以持续输注还是大剂量推注的方式给药,这一问题仍未得到解答。氢化可的松会导致血糖升高,持续输注氢化可的松有可能减少血糖水平的波动,并且通过这种方法可能能更好地实现严格的血糖控制。

方法

在这项前瞻性随机研究中,我们比较了48例接受同等剂量(200毫克/天)氢化可的松治疗的感染性休克患者的血糖谱、胰岛素需求量、所需护理工作量以及休克逆转情况,这些患者分别接受大剂量推注或持续输注氢化可的松治疗。氢化可的松治疗持续时间为五天。

结果

两组患者的平均血糖水平相似,但接受大剂量推注治疗的患者高血糖发作次数显著更高(每位患者15.7±8.5次发作,而另组为10.5±8.6次发作,p = 0.039)。此外,在大剂量推注组中,为维持严格的正常血糖水平,需要更频繁地调整胰岛素输注速率(每位患者每天4.7±2.2次调整,而另组为3.4±1.9次调整,p = 0.038)。两组中低血糖发作均罕见。在休克逆转方面未见差异。

结论

如果对感染性休克患者采用持续输注氢化可的松疗法,则更容易实现严格的正常血糖水平。这种方法还可减少维持严格血糖控制所需的护理工作量。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验