Tu Ha T, Lauer Johanna R
Issue Brief Cent Stud Health Syst Change. 2009 Jul(126):1-6.
Among the many health care quality transparency initiatives introduced in recent years, two state-based programs stand out for thoughtful design, implementation and usable, useful data: CalHospitalCompare, a report card for California hospitals, and Massachusetts Health Quality Partners, a report card for Massachusetts primary care physician groups. According to a new Center for Studying Health System Change (HSC) analysis, both programs share key elements that contribute to their effectiveness: engaging and collaborating with the provider community from the outset; paying particular attention to the caliber of the quality data reported; presenting the quality data to consumers in formats that are easy to understand and remember; and providing hospitals and physicians with detailed information on their own performance. Quality transparency initiatives that do not focus sufficiently on these key design and implementation elements are unlikely to influence quality improvement in a meaningful way.
在近年来推出的众多医疗保健质量透明度倡议中,有两个基于州的项目因其精心设计、实施以及实用且有用的数据脱颖而出:加州医院比较项目(CalHospitalCompare),这是一份针对加利福尼亚州医院的成绩单;以及马萨诸塞州医疗质量伙伴项目(Massachusetts Health Quality Partners),这是一份针对马萨诸塞州初级保健医生团体的成绩单。根据卫生系统变革研究中心(HSC)的一项新分析,这两个项目都具备有助于其有效性的关键要素:从一开始就与医疗服务提供者群体进行互动与合作;特别关注所报告质量数据的质量;以易于理解和记忆的形式向消费者呈现质量数据;以及为医院和医生提供有关其自身表现的详细信息。那些没有充分关注这些关键设计和实施要素的质量透明度倡议不太可能以有意义的方式影响质量改进。