Conners C K
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 1992 Spring;2(1):11-22. doi: 10.1089/cap.1992.2.11.
ABSTRACT Despite the sophistication of the currently available studies on antidepressant treatment of adolescent depression, various methodological problems limit the conclusions that can be drawn. It is difficult to evaluate trends across the available studies because of differences in definitions of treatment response, therapeutic response and placebo response rates, symptomatic subtypes of depression, comorbidity, drugs studied, and study designs that limit the statistical power to detect treatment effects. Some fundamental issues concern the sample selection and reliability of the measurement instruments, as well as the assumption that efficacy of antidepressants in adults is easy to demonstrate. None of the studies now available carefully examine behavioral, social, or academic variables that clinicians commonly use to assess antidepressant effects in adolescents. Before concluding that antidepressants are less effective in treating depression in adolescents than in adults, these methodological issues need further study. The main problem is not merely the small number of studies or low number of subjects. Until the validity of the diagnostic construct of depression in adolescents is better developed, or until more homogeneous samples of patients can be defined, it is pointless to encourage further attempts to assess antidepressant efficacy using the past methodologies.
摘要 尽管目前关于青少年抑郁症抗抑郁治疗的研究已较为成熟,但各种方法学问题限制了所能得出的结论。由于治疗反应、治疗性反应和安慰剂反应率的定义、抑郁症的症状亚型、共病情况、所研究的药物以及限制检测治疗效果统计效力的研究设计存在差异,因此难以评估现有研究的趋势。一些基本问题涉及样本选择和测量工具的可靠性,以及抗抑郁药在成年人中疗效易于证明这一假设。目前没有一项研究仔细考察临床医生通常用于评估青少年抗抑郁效果的行为、社会或学业变量。在得出抗抑郁药治疗青少年抑郁症的效果不如治疗成年人有效的结论之前,这些方法学问题需要进一步研究。主要问题不仅仅在于研究数量少或受试者数量少。在青少年抑郁症诊断结构的有效性得到更好发展之前,或者在能够定义更多同质的患者样本之前,鼓励使用过去的方法进一步评估抗抑郁疗效是毫无意义的。