Suppr超能文献

抑郁症长期治疗的疗效。

Efficacy in long-term treatment of depression.

作者信息

Montgomery S A

机构信息

Academic Department of Psychiatry, St. Mary's Hospital, London, England, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Clin Psychiatry. 1996;57 Suppl 2:24-30.

PMID:8626360
Abstract

Available evidence suggests that antidepressants need to be continued on a long-term basis after the acute response. Premature discontinuation soon after symptomatic response is associated with the return of depression (relapse) in many patients. One efficacy measure of an antidepressant required by many regulatory authorities prior to approval of the agent is the ability of the antidepressant to continue the acute response compared with a placebo control. The reference tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) amitriptyline and imipramine both have been shown to be effective in this continuation phase, but there is surprisingly little evidence on the efficacy of the other TCAs. The serotonin selective reuptake inhibitors paroxetine, fluoxetine, sertraline, and citalopram, as well as nefazodone, a new antidepressant with a dual mechanism of action that is classified as a serotonin receptor modulator, are effective compared with placebo. Placebo appears to be a good comparator in assessing the long-term efficacy of antidepressants. For example, in an assessment of the long-term efficacy of citalopram, patients who responded while taking placebo and were continued on placebo treatment were compared with patients who responded to drug and were transferred to placebo. The relapse rates in both cases were similar, validating placebo as a useful control. Most studies of long-term efficacy use the discontinuation design in which patients are treated with an active drug until response is obtained and then are either continued on the active drug or switched to placebo in a random and blinded manner. Alternatively, studies with nefazodone have used the double-blind continuation design, which may be preferred because it avoids any confounding effects of the discontinuation of drug in a drug-responsive patient. For example, in acute studies, responders to treatment with nefazodone, imipramine, or placebo were continued on the same treatment under double-blind conditions for 1 year; both antidepressants were effective compared with placebo. This study design may be useful in providing an estimate of long-term efficacy that can be obtained relatively early in a drug development program. The length of treatment in the continuation phase of therapy is also of interest. The separation of drug and placebo efficacy is sharpest in the first 4 months, which is consistent with the recommendation that all treatment for depression should continue for a minimum of 4 to 6 months to prevent relapse after symptomatic response of the acute episode. After the continuation phase (relapse prevention), evolving evidence strongly indicates that antidepressant treatment should be continued in patients at risk for recurrence. Depending on the number of recurrences, lifelong prophylactic therapy may be warranted.

摘要

现有证据表明,抗抑郁药在急性反应后需要长期持续使用。症状缓解后过早停药与许多患者抑郁症复发相关。许多监管机构在批准一种抗抑郁药之前要求的一项疗效指标是,与安慰剂对照相比,该抗抑郁药维持急性反应的能力。参比三环类抗抑郁药(TCAs)阿米替林和丙咪嗪在这一维持阶段均已显示有效,但令人惊讶的是,关于其他三环类抗抑郁药疗效的证据很少。5-羟色胺选择性再摄取抑制剂帕罗西汀、氟西汀、舍曲林和西酞普兰,以及具有双重作用机制、被归类为5-羟色胺受体调节剂的新型抗抑郁药奈法唑酮,与安慰剂相比均有效。安慰剂似乎是评估抗抑郁药长期疗效的良好对照。例如,在一项评估西酞普兰长期疗效的研究中,将服用安慰剂时有反应且继续接受安慰剂治疗的患者与对药物有反应并转用安慰剂的患者进行了比较。两种情况下的复发率相似,证实安慰剂是一种有用的对照。大多数长期疗效研究采用停药设计,即患者先用活性药物治疗至出现反应,然后以随机、盲法的方式继续使用活性药物或改用安慰剂。另外,有关奈法唑酮的研究采用了双盲维持设计,这种设计可能更可取,因为它避免了在药物反应性患者中停药带来的任何混杂效应。例如,在急性研究中,对奈法唑酮、丙咪嗪或安慰剂治疗有反应的患者在双盲条件下继续接受相同治疗1年;与安慰剂相比,两种抗抑郁药均有效。这种研究设计可能有助于在药物研发项目相对早期提供可获得的长期疗效估计。治疗维持阶段的治疗时长也备受关注。药物和安慰剂疗效的差异在最初4个月最为明显,这与抑郁症所有治疗应持续至少4至6个月以预防急性发作症状缓解后的复发这一建议一致。在维持阶段(预防复发)之后,越来越多的证据强烈表明,有复发风险的患者应继续接受抗抑郁治疗。根据复发次数,可能需要进行终身预防性治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验