Suppr超能文献

人类视觉皮层中的有生命和无生命物体:任务独立的类别效应的证据。

Animate and inanimate objects in human visual cortex: Evidence for task-independent category effects.

机构信息

School of Psychology, Adeilad Brigantia, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd LL572AS, Wales, UK.

出版信息

Neuropsychologia. 2009 Dec;47(14):3111-7. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.07.008. Epub 2009 Jul 23.

Abstract

Evidence from neuropsychology suggests that the distinction between animate and inanimate kinds is fundamental to human cognition. Previous neuroimaging studies have reported that viewing animate objects activates ventrolateral visual brain regions, whereas inanimate objects activate ventromedial regions. However, these studies have typically compared only a small number of animate and inanimate kinds (e.g. animals and tools) and some evidence indicates that task demands determine whether these effects occur at all. In the current study we test whether a lateral-medial animacy bias is evident across a variety of stimuli, and across different tasks (matching two stimuli at a general, intermediate and exemplar level). Images of objects were presented sequentially in pairs, and match/mismatch judgements were made at different levels in different scans. The fMRI data showed ventrolateral activation for animate objects and ventromedial activation for inanimate objects. Additional analyses within these regions revealed no main effect of task, and no interactions between task and animacy. Furthermore, there were no subpopulations of voxels in any of the regions of interest that showed a significant task by animacy interaction. We conclude that ventral animate/inanimate category biases do not always depend on top-down task orientation. Furthermore, we consider whether the animate and inanimate activations reflect biases in the non-preferred responses of strongly category-selective regions such as the fusiform face area or the parahippocampal place area.

摘要

神经心理学的证据表明,有生命与无生命的区分是人类认知的基础。先前的神经影像学研究报告称,观看有生命的物体激活了外侧视区,而观看无生命的物体则激活了腹内侧区。然而,这些研究通常只比较了少量的有生命和无生命的物体(例如动物和工具),并且有一些证据表明,任务需求决定了这些效应是否会发生。在当前的研究中,我们测试了在各种刺激物和不同任务中是否存在侧-中(lateral-medial)有生命的偏向(例如,在一般、中间和范例水平上匹配两个刺激)。物体的图像以成对的形式依次呈现,在不同的扫描中在不同的水平上进行匹配/不匹配的判断。fMRI 数据显示,有生命的物体激活了外侧区,无生命的物体激活了腹内侧区。在这些区域内的进一步分析显示,任务没有主效应,任务和有生命的物体之间也没有相互作用。此外,在任何感兴趣的区域中,没有任何体素亚群表现出任务与有生命的物体之间有显著的相互作用。我们的结论是,腹侧有生命/无生命类别的偏向并不总是取决于自上而下的任务取向。此外,我们还考虑了这些激活是否反映了在强烈类别选择性区域(如梭状回面部区或旁海马区)的非首选反应中的偏向。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验